十多年来(2014-2023年)全球高影响力文献中土耳其骨科和创伤学的文献计量学分析。

IF 1
Tolgahan Korkmaz, Muhammed Yusuf Afacan, Cansu Elibollar, Ali Osman Gokhan Cıbıkcı, Bedri Karaismailoğlu, Ali Seker
{"title":"十多年来(2014-2023年)全球高影响力文献中土耳其骨科和创伤学的文献计量学分析。","authors":"Tolgahan Korkmaz, Muhammed Yusuf Afacan, Cansu Elibollar, Ali Osman Gokhan Cıbıkcı, Bedri Karaismailoğlu, Ali Seker","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2025.25362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective: This study aimed to assess the contributions and global impact of Turkish orthopedics and traumatology research published in high-impact international journals over the past decade (2014-2023). By examining article types, citation metrics, journal impact factors, and author a!liations, the aim was to highlight publication trends, strengths, and areas needing improvement within Turkish orthopedic research. Methods: Using the Web of Science database, keywords were searched under journal categories including \"Orthopedics,\" \"Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine,\" and \"Sports Sciences.\" Articles from the top 40 orthopedic journals indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded were identified and selected based on their 2022 impact factors. Articles published between January 2014 and December 2023 with first authors a!liated with a Turkish institution were included. Citation density was calculated by dividing the total number of citations by the number of years since publication. Data extracted included publication type, citation count, citation density, research methodology, author a!liations, and institutional contributions. Results: Out of 70 279 articles published globally, 425 orthopedic articles with Turkish first authorship were identified in the selected journals. Most articles were clinical (88.7%), with the most frequent article types being case presentations (31.3%), retrospective cohort studies (17.9%), and laboratory research (11.3%). The least common types were expert opinions, epidemiological studies, and meta-analyses. The majority of articles appeared in Spine Journal (34.6%) and Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (27.3%), with no articles published in the highest-ranked journal (British Journal of Sports Medicine). Spine surgery was the leading subfield (29.9%), followed by sports, shoulder, and elbow surgery (22.6%) and reconstructive surgery (16%). Orthopedic specialists comprised 56% of first authors, with multicenter studies representing 65.4% of the articles. Public institutions accounted for 80.1% of published articles, while private institutions contributed 19.9%. A total of 356 articles were cited 8349 times, with a median citation number of 9 per article. Mean citation density was highest in meta-analysis (8.5 citation/year), epidemiological studies (8.3 citation/year), and randomized controlled trials (7.8 citation/ year), while lowest in case presentations (0.3 citation/year), expert opinions (0.4 citation/year), and laboratory research (2.2 citation/year). Conclusion: Turkish orthopedic research has maintained a significant presence in top orthopedic journals, mostly through clinical studies, especially in spinal and sports injury subfields. Despite high publication volume, citation impact remains relatively lower. Future e\"orts should encourage higher-impact study designs, international collaborations, and standardized research evaluations to enhance the global influence of Turkish orthopedic literature. Level of Evidence: N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"59 5","pages":"315-321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A bibliometric analysis of Turkish orthopedics and traumatology in high-impact global literature over a decade (2014-2023).\",\"authors\":\"Tolgahan Korkmaz, Muhammed Yusuf Afacan, Cansu Elibollar, Ali Osman Gokhan Cıbıkcı, Bedri Karaismailoğlu, Ali Seker\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/j.aott.2025.25362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective: This study aimed to assess the contributions and global impact of Turkish orthopedics and traumatology research published in high-impact international journals over the past decade (2014-2023). By examining article types, citation metrics, journal impact factors, and author a!liations, the aim was to highlight publication trends, strengths, and areas needing improvement within Turkish orthopedic research. Methods: Using the Web of Science database, keywords were searched under journal categories including \\\"Orthopedics,\\\" \\\"Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine,\\\" and \\\"Sports Sciences.\\\" Articles from the top 40 orthopedic journals indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded were identified and selected based on their 2022 impact factors. Articles published between January 2014 and December 2023 with first authors a!liated with a Turkish institution were included. Citation density was calculated by dividing the total number of citations by the number of years since publication. Data extracted included publication type, citation count, citation density, research methodology, author a!liations, and institutional contributions. Results: Out of 70 279 articles published globally, 425 orthopedic articles with Turkish first authorship were identified in the selected journals. Most articles were clinical (88.7%), with the most frequent article types being case presentations (31.3%), retrospective cohort studies (17.9%), and laboratory research (11.3%). The least common types were expert opinions, epidemiological studies, and meta-analyses. The majority of articles appeared in Spine Journal (34.6%) and Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (27.3%), with no articles published in the highest-ranked journal (British Journal of Sports Medicine). Spine surgery was the leading subfield (29.9%), followed by sports, shoulder, and elbow surgery (22.6%) and reconstructive surgery (16%). Orthopedic specialists comprised 56% of first authors, with multicenter studies representing 65.4% of the articles. Public institutions accounted for 80.1% of published articles, while private institutions contributed 19.9%. A total of 356 articles were cited 8349 times, with a median citation number of 9 per article. Mean citation density was highest in meta-analysis (8.5 citation/year), epidemiological studies (8.3 citation/year), and randomized controlled trials (7.8 citation/ year), while lowest in case presentations (0.3 citation/year), expert opinions (0.4 citation/year), and laboratory research (2.2 citation/year). Conclusion: Turkish orthopedic research has maintained a significant presence in top orthopedic journals, mostly through clinical studies, especially in spinal and sports injury subfields. Despite high publication volume, citation impact remains relatively lower. Future e\\\"orts should encourage higher-impact study designs, international collaborations, and standardized research evaluations to enhance the global influence of Turkish orthopedic literature. Level of Evidence: N/A.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"volume\":\"59 5\",\"pages\":\"315-321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482954/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2025.25362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2025.25362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估过去十年(2014-2023)土耳其骨科和创伤学研究在高影响力国际期刊上发表的贡献和全球影响。通过检查文章类型、引用指标、期刊影响因子和作者a!其目的是突出土耳其骨科研究的出版趋势、优势和需要改进的领域。方法:利用Web of Science数据库,在“骨科”、“骨科、康复与运动医学”和“运动科学”等期刊类别下检索关键词。从科学引文索引扩展索引中排名前40位的骨科期刊中,根据其2022年影响因子进行识别和选择。2014年1月至2023年12月期间发表的第一作者为a!包括与土耳其机构有联系的人。引用密度的计算方法是用总引用数除以论文发表的年数。提取的数据包括出版物类型、引用次数、引用密度、研究方法、作者a!关系和机构捐助。结果:在全球发表的70 279篇文章中,425篇土耳其第一作者的骨科文章在选定的期刊中被确定。大多数文章为临床(88.7%),最常见的文章类型是病例报告(31.3%)、回顾性队列研究(17.9%)和实验室研究(11.3%)。最不常见的类型是专家意见、流行病学研究和荟萃分析。大多数文章发表在脊柱杂志(34.6%)和膝关节外科,运动创伤学,关节镜(27.3%),没有文章发表在排名最高的杂志(英国运动医学杂志)。脊柱外科是主要的子领域(29.9%),其次是运动、肩部和肘部手术(22.6%)和重建手术(16%)。骨科专家占第一作者的56%,多中心研究占文章的65.4%。公共机构占发表文章的80.1%,而私人机构占19.9%。共有356篇文章被引8349次,平均被引次数为9次/篇。平均引用密度最高的是荟萃分析(8.5次/年)、流行病学研究(8.3次/年)和随机对照试验(7.8次/年),最低的是病例报告(0.3次/年)、专家意见(0.4次/年)和实验室研究(2.2次/年)。结论:土耳其骨科研究在骨科顶级期刊上保持了显著的地位,主要是通过临床研究,特别是在脊柱和运动损伤子领域。尽管发表量很高,但引文影响仍然相对较低。未来的努力应该鼓励更有影响力的研究设计、国际合作和标准化的研究评估,以提高土耳其骨科文献的全球影响力。证据级别:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A bibliometric analysis of Turkish orthopedics and traumatology in high-impact global literature over a decade (2014-2023).

Objective: This study aimed to assess the contributions and global impact of Turkish orthopedics and traumatology research published in high-impact international journals over the past decade (2014-2023). By examining article types, citation metrics, journal impact factors, and author a!liations, the aim was to highlight publication trends, strengths, and areas needing improvement within Turkish orthopedic research. Methods: Using the Web of Science database, keywords were searched under journal categories including "Orthopedics," "Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine," and "Sports Sciences." Articles from the top 40 orthopedic journals indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded were identified and selected based on their 2022 impact factors. Articles published between January 2014 and December 2023 with first authors a!liated with a Turkish institution were included. Citation density was calculated by dividing the total number of citations by the number of years since publication. Data extracted included publication type, citation count, citation density, research methodology, author a!liations, and institutional contributions. Results: Out of 70 279 articles published globally, 425 orthopedic articles with Turkish first authorship were identified in the selected journals. Most articles were clinical (88.7%), with the most frequent article types being case presentations (31.3%), retrospective cohort studies (17.9%), and laboratory research (11.3%). The least common types were expert opinions, epidemiological studies, and meta-analyses. The majority of articles appeared in Spine Journal (34.6%) and Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (27.3%), with no articles published in the highest-ranked journal (British Journal of Sports Medicine). Spine surgery was the leading subfield (29.9%), followed by sports, shoulder, and elbow surgery (22.6%) and reconstructive surgery (16%). Orthopedic specialists comprised 56% of first authors, with multicenter studies representing 65.4% of the articles. Public institutions accounted for 80.1% of published articles, while private institutions contributed 19.9%. A total of 356 articles were cited 8349 times, with a median citation number of 9 per article. Mean citation density was highest in meta-analysis (8.5 citation/year), epidemiological studies (8.3 citation/year), and randomized controlled trials (7.8 citation/ year), while lowest in case presentations (0.3 citation/year), expert opinions (0.4 citation/year), and laboratory research (2.2 citation/year). Conclusion: Turkish orthopedic research has maintained a significant presence in top orthopedic journals, mostly through clinical studies, especially in spinal and sports injury subfields. Despite high publication volume, citation impact remains relatively lower. Future e"orts should encourage higher-impact study designs, international collaborations, and standardized research evaluations to enhance the global influence of Turkish orthopedic literature. Level of Evidence: N/A.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信