我们是否需要一个专门针对非劣效性的卫生技术评估方法？评Taylor等人（2025）在卫生技术评估中的临床等效性和非劣效性。

IF 3 3区医学 Q1 ECONOMICS

European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s10198-025-01840-0

Beryl Primrose Gladstone, Werner Vach

{"title":"我们是否需要一个专门针对非劣效性的卫生技术评估方法？评Taylor等人（2025）在卫生技术评估中的临床等效性和非劣效性。","authors":"Beryl Primrose Gladstone, Werner Vach","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01840-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taylor and colleagues presented a very informative and comprehensive overview on the current practice of performing non-inferiority analysis in HTA. We would like to point out that HTA of potentially non-inferior technologies should be based on balancing potential advantages against potential deficits exactly as for potentially superior technologies.","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do we need a health technology assessment approach for non-inferiority specifically? A comment on: clinical equivalence and non-inferiority within health technology assessment by Taylor et al. (2025).\",\"authors\":\"Beryl Primrose Gladstone, Werner Vach\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10198-025-01840-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taylor and colleagues presented a very informative and comprehensive overview on the current practice of performing non-inferiority analysis in HTA. We would like to point out that HTA of potentially non-inferior technologies should be based on balancing potential advantages against potential deficits exactly as for potentially superior technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01840-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01840-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Taylor及其同事对目前在HTA中进行非劣效性分析的实践进行了非常翔实和全面的概述。我们想指出的是，潜在的非劣势技术的HTA应该基于平衡潜在的优势与潜在的劣势，就像潜在的优势技术一样。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Do we need a health technology assessment approach for non-inferiority specifically? A comment on: clinical equivalence and non-inferiority within health technology assessment by Taylor et al. (2025).

Taylor and colleagues presented a very informative and comprehensive overview on the current practice of performing non-inferiority analysis in HTA. We would like to point out that HTA of potentially non-inferior technologies should be based on balancing potential advantages against potential deficits exactly as for potentially superior technologies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of Health Economics Multiple-

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

2.30%

发文量

131

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ