胫骨应力性骨折的手术治疗:甲x钢板。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220253305e290433
Paulo Henrique Schmidt Lara, Guilherme Leme Cabello, Danilo Cabral Domingues, Daniel Costa Bezerra, Antônio Bezerra de Albuquerque, Paulo Santoro Belangero
{"title":"胫骨应力性骨折的手术治疗:甲x钢板。","authors":"Paulo Henrique Schmidt Lara, Guilherme Leme Cabello, Danilo Cabral Domingues, Daniel Costa Bezerra, Antônio Bezerra de Albuquerque, Paulo Santoro Belangero","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220253305e290433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To analyze and compare two surgical treatment methods for tibial stress fractures: intramedullary nailing and tension plate, taking into account functional outcomes and postoperative results. This systematic review was conducted and written in accordance with the guidelines for systematic reviews - PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The bibliographic search was carried out between January and September 2024 in journals indexed in the PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane and Embase databases. Ten studies were selected. Among them, five were case reports, four were case series, and one was a retrospective cohort study. Intramedullary nailing offers good stabilization and a gradual return to sports activities, but it can cause complications such as knee pain and additional fractures. The anterior tension plate, on the other hand, provides effective stabilization with less anterior knee pain and faster healing times, but it is more invasive and may require implant removal and intensive rehabilitation. The choice between intramedullary nailing and tension plate should be based on a detailed assessment of the individual characteristics of the patient, the nature of the fracture, and the potential risks associated with each technique. <b><i>Level of Evidence IIA; Systematic Review of Cohort Studies.</i></b></p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"33 5","pages":"e290433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SURGICAL TREATMENT OF TIBIAL STRESS FRACTURE: NAIL X PLATE.\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Henrique Schmidt Lara, Guilherme Leme Cabello, Danilo Cabral Domingues, Daniel Costa Bezerra, Antônio Bezerra de Albuquerque, Paulo Santoro Belangero\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-785220253305e290433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To analyze and compare two surgical treatment methods for tibial stress fractures: intramedullary nailing and tension plate, taking into account functional outcomes and postoperative results. This systematic review was conducted and written in accordance with the guidelines for systematic reviews - PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The bibliographic search was carried out between January and September 2024 in journals indexed in the PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane and Embase databases. Ten studies were selected. Among them, five were case reports, four were case series, and one was a retrospective cohort study. Intramedullary nailing offers good stabilization and a gradual return to sports activities, but it can cause complications such as knee pain and additional fractures. The anterior tension plate, on the other hand, provides effective stabilization with less anterior knee pain and faster healing times, but it is more invasive and may require implant removal and intensive rehabilitation. The choice between intramedullary nailing and tension plate should be based on a detailed assessment of the individual characteristics of the patient, the nature of the fracture, and the potential risks associated with each technique. <b><i>Level of Evidence IIA; Systematic Review of Cohort Studies.</i></b></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"e290433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456891/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220253305e290433\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220253305e290433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析比较胫骨应力性骨折的两种手术治疗方法:髓内钉和张力钢板,并考虑功能结局和术后效果。本系统评价是按照系统评价指南PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)进行和撰写的。文献检索于2024年1月至9月期间在PubMed、Lilacs、Cochrane和Embase数据库中索引的期刊中进行。选择了10项研究。其中5篇为病例报告,4篇为病例系列,1篇为回顾性队列研究。髓内钉提供了良好的稳定性和逐渐恢复体育活动,但它可以引起并发症,如膝关节疼痛和额外的骨折。另一方面,前部张力钢板提供有效的稳定,减少膝关节前部疼痛和更快的愈合时间,但它更具侵入性,可能需要移除植入物和强化康复。髓内钉和张力钢板之间的选择应基于对患者个体特征、骨折性质以及每种技术相关的潜在风险的详细评估。证据水平IIA;队列研究的系统评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF TIBIAL STRESS FRACTURE: NAIL X PLATE.

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF TIBIAL STRESS FRACTURE: NAIL X PLATE.

To analyze and compare two surgical treatment methods for tibial stress fractures: intramedullary nailing and tension plate, taking into account functional outcomes and postoperative results. This systematic review was conducted and written in accordance with the guidelines for systematic reviews - PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The bibliographic search was carried out between January and September 2024 in journals indexed in the PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane and Embase databases. Ten studies were selected. Among them, five were case reports, four were case series, and one was a retrospective cohort study. Intramedullary nailing offers good stabilization and a gradual return to sports activities, but it can cause complications such as knee pain and additional fractures. The anterior tension plate, on the other hand, provides effective stabilization with less anterior knee pain and faster healing times, but it is more invasive and may require implant removal and intensive rehabilitation. The choice between intramedullary nailing and tension plate should be based on a detailed assessment of the individual characteristics of the patient, the nature of the fracture, and the potential risks associated with each technique. Level of Evidence IIA; Systematic Review of Cohort Studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信