Manoli Vourvahis, Arthur J Bergman, Adam G Ogden, Jim Hughes, James R Gosset, Amit S Kalgutkar, Neeta B Amin
{"title":"不同程度肝功能损害对二酰基甘油酰基转移酶2 (DGAT2)抑制剂Ervogastat和乙酰辅酶a羧化酶(ACC)抑制剂Clesacostat药代动力学的影响","authors":"Manoli Vourvahis, Arthur J Bergman, Adam G Ogden, Jim Hughes, James R Gosset, Amit S Kalgutkar, Neeta B Amin","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ervogastat, a diacylglycerol-O-acyltransferase-2 inhibitor, and clesacostat, an acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor, are in clinical development for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Study 1 and Study 2 were open-label, Phase 1 trials that assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of ervogastat (100 mg) and clesacostat (25 mg), respectively, in participants (n = 6/cohort) with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (HI) and compared to those without HI (reference). Plasma samples were analyzed for both total and unbound concentrations in Study 2 as clesacostat is highly protein bound. In Study 1, compared to participants without HI, ervogastat exposure (AUC<sub>inf</sub>) was 56%, 65%, and 52% higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively. However, when excluding PK data from a participant with unexplained low exposures in reference group, ervogastat exposures were similar between those with/without HI. In Study 2, total clesacostat exposure was 36%, 24%, and 19% higher for mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively, as compared to reference group. Unbound clesacostat exposures were 70%, 83%, and 166% higher for mild, moderate, and severe HI cohorts, respectively, with clesacostat plasma protein binding shown to decrease with increasing HI severity. Ervogastat and clesacostat were well tolerated with no clinically significant laboratory abnormalities or changes in vital signs and/or electrocardiograms observed. Observed exposures in HI studies were consistent with simulated exposures in MASH population. Taking into consideration the safety margins at the highest doses evaluated in Phase 2, no dose adjustment of ervogastat or clesacostat is currently warranted for patients with hepatic impairment. NCT: NCT04091061, NCT03309202.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Varying Degrees of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Ervogastat, a Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2) Inhibitor, and Clesacostat, an Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase (ACC) Inhibitor.\",\"authors\":\"Manoli Vourvahis, Arthur J Bergman, Adam G Ogden, Jim Hughes, James R Gosset, Amit S Kalgutkar, Neeta B Amin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcph.70106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ervogastat, a diacylglycerol-O-acyltransferase-2 inhibitor, and clesacostat, an acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor, are in clinical development for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Study 1 and Study 2 were open-label, Phase 1 trials that assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of ervogastat (100 mg) and clesacostat (25 mg), respectively, in participants (n = 6/cohort) with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (HI) and compared to those without HI (reference). Plasma samples were analyzed for both total and unbound concentrations in Study 2 as clesacostat is highly protein bound. In Study 1, compared to participants without HI, ervogastat exposure (AUC<sub>inf</sub>) was 56%, 65%, and 52% higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively. However, when excluding PK data from a participant with unexplained low exposures in reference group, ervogastat exposures were similar between those with/without HI. In Study 2, total clesacostat exposure was 36%, 24%, and 19% higher for mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively, as compared to reference group. Unbound clesacostat exposures were 70%, 83%, and 166% higher for mild, moderate, and severe HI cohorts, respectively, with clesacostat plasma protein binding shown to decrease with increasing HI severity. Ervogastat and clesacostat were well tolerated with no clinically significant laboratory abnormalities or changes in vital signs and/or electrocardiograms observed. Observed exposures in HI studies were consistent with simulated exposures in MASH population. Taking into consideration the safety margins at the highest doses evaluated in Phase 2, no dose adjustment of ervogastat or clesacostat is currently warranted for patients with hepatic impairment. NCT: NCT04091061, NCT03309202.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70106\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Ervogastat是一种二酰基甘油- o -酰基转移酶-2抑制剂,clesacostat是一种乙酰辅酶a羧化酶抑制剂,用于治疗代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎(MASH)的临床开发。研究1和研究2是开放标签的1期试验,分别评估了单剂量ervogastat (100mg)和clesacostat (25mg)在轻度、中度或重度肝功能损害(HI)参与者(n = 6/队列)中的药代动力学(PK),并与没有HI的参与者进行了比较(参考文献)。研究2分析了血浆样品的总浓度和未结合浓度,因为clesacostat是高度蛋白结合的。在研究1中,与没有HI的参与者相比,轻度、中度和重度HI参与者的ervoogastat暴露(AUCinf)分别高出56%、65%和52%。然而,当排除参照组中不明原因低暴露的参与者的PK数据时,有/没有HI的参与者的运动胃泌素暴露相似。在研究2中,与对照组相比,轻度、中度和重度HI患者的总接触量分别高出36%、24%和19%。在轻度、中度和重度HI队列中,未结合的沙司他暴露量分别高出70%、83%和166%,沙司他血浆蛋白结合显示随着HI严重程度的增加而降低。Ervogastat和clesacostat耐受性良好,没有观察到临床显著的实验室异常或生命体征和/或心电图的变化。HI研究中观察到的暴露与MASH人群中的模拟暴露一致。考虑到2期评估的最高剂量的安全边际,目前没有必要对肝功能损害患者调整ervogastat或clesacostat的剂量。nct04091061, nct03309202。
Effect of Varying Degrees of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Ervogastat, a Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2) Inhibitor, and Clesacostat, an Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase (ACC) Inhibitor.
Ervogastat, a diacylglycerol-O-acyltransferase-2 inhibitor, and clesacostat, an acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor, are in clinical development for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Study 1 and Study 2 were open-label, Phase 1 trials that assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of ervogastat (100 mg) and clesacostat (25 mg), respectively, in participants (n = 6/cohort) with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (HI) and compared to those without HI (reference). Plasma samples were analyzed for both total and unbound concentrations in Study 2 as clesacostat is highly protein bound. In Study 1, compared to participants without HI, ervogastat exposure (AUCinf) was 56%, 65%, and 52% higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively. However, when excluding PK data from a participant with unexplained low exposures in reference group, ervogastat exposures were similar between those with/without HI. In Study 2, total clesacostat exposure was 36%, 24%, and 19% higher for mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively, as compared to reference group. Unbound clesacostat exposures were 70%, 83%, and 166% higher for mild, moderate, and severe HI cohorts, respectively, with clesacostat plasma protein binding shown to decrease with increasing HI severity. Ervogastat and clesacostat were well tolerated with no clinically significant laboratory abnormalities or changes in vital signs and/or electrocardiograms observed. Observed exposures in HI studies were consistent with simulated exposures in MASH population. Taking into consideration the safety margins at the highest doses evaluated in Phase 2, no dose adjustment of ervogastat or clesacostat is currently warranted for patients with hepatic impairment. NCT: NCT04091061, NCT03309202.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.