基于免疫治疗的肾集管癌:回顾性病例系列分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Xiaowei Zeng, Zhenjie Zhu, Yedie He, Jinchao Chen
{"title":"基于免疫治疗的肾集管癌:回顾性病例系列分析。","authors":"Xiaowei Zeng, Zhenjie Zhu, Yedie He, Jinchao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC), a rare and aggressive renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtype, lacks effective standard therapies for advanced stages. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard in clear cell RCC (ccRCC), their role in CDC is poorly defined, supported mainly by case reports. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ICI-based therapy in CDC patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective case series included 11 pathologically confirmed CDC patients treated with ICI-based regimens between January 2015 and December 2024. Primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; CTCAE v5.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 59 years; 81.8% were male. Ten patients with metastatic disease and received immunotherapy as systemic treatment, while one received it as adjuvant therapy. Lines of immunotherapy-based treatment included: first-line (9 instances), second-line (4 instances), and third-line or beyond (2 instances). Regimens included: ICI monotherapy (n = 4 instances), ICI + chemotherapy (n = 4), ICI + targeted therapy (n = 8), and ICI + anti-HER2 ADC (RC48) (n = 1). With a median follow-up of 29 months, median OS was 42 months. Systemic ICI therapy yielded an ORR of 43.8% and disease control rate (DCR) of 81.3%. Notably, targeted-immunotherapy combinations demonstrated an ORR of 50%. One patient achieved partial response (PR) with third-line ICI + RC48 (PFS 8 months). Two exceptional cases achieved sustained complete responses (CR) exceeding 56 and 64 months, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 36.4% of patients, managed without treatment-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective analysis provides preliminary evidence that ICI-based therapy, particularly targeted-immunotherapy combinations, exhibits promising antitumor activity and manageable safety in CDC patients, with some achieving deep and durable responses. The observed efficacy of targeted-immunotherapy (ORR 50%) and the potential signal with anti-HER2 ADC warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunotherapy-based treatment in renal collecting duct carcinoma: A retrospective case series analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaowei Zeng, Zhenjie Zhu, Yedie He, Jinchao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC), a rare and aggressive renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtype, lacks effective standard therapies for advanced stages. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard in clear cell RCC (ccRCC), their role in CDC is poorly defined, supported mainly by case reports. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ICI-based therapy in CDC patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective case series included 11 pathologically confirmed CDC patients treated with ICI-based regimens between January 2015 and December 2024. Primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; CTCAE v5.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 59 years; 81.8% were male. Ten patients with metastatic disease and received immunotherapy as systemic treatment, while one received it as adjuvant therapy. Lines of immunotherapy-based treatment included: first-line (9 instances), second-line (4 instances), and third-line or beyond (2 instances). Regimens included: ICI monotherapy (n = 4 instances), ICI + chemotherapy (n = 4), ICI + targeted therapy (n = 8), and ICI + anti-HER2 ADC (RC48) (n = 1). With a median follow-up of 29 months, median OS was 42 months. Systemic ICI therapy yielded an ORR of 43.8% and disease control rate (DCR) of 81.3%. Notably, targeted-immunotherapy combinations demonstrated an ORR of 50%. One patient achieved partial response (PR) with third-line ICI + RC48 (PFS 8 months). Two exceptional cases achieved sustained complete responses (CR) exceeding 56 and 64 months, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 36.4% of patients, managed without treatment-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective analysis provides preliminary evidence that ICI-based therapy, particularly targeted-immunotherapy combinations, exhibits promising antitumor activity and manageable safety in CDC patients, with some achieving deep and durable responses. The observed efficacy of targeted-immunotherapy (ORR 50%) and the potential signal with anti-HER2 ADC warrant further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:收集管癌(CDC)是一种罕见的侵袭性肾细胞癌(RCC)亚型,晚期缺乏有效的标准治疗方法。虽然免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在透明细胞RCC (ccRCC)中是标准的,但它们在CDC中的作用定义不清,主要由病例报告支持。本研究评估了以ci为基础的治疗在CDC患者中的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:该单中心回顾性病例系列包括11例2015年1月至2024年12月期间接受基于ci方案治疗的病理证实的CDC患者。主要终点是客观缓解率(ORR; RECIST v1.1)。次要结局包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和≥3级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs; CTCAE v5.0)。结果:中位年龄59岁;81.8%为男性。10例转移性疾病患者接受免疫治疗作为全身治疗,1例接受免疫治疗作为辅助治疗。基于免疫疗法的治疗线包括:一线(9例)、二线(4例)和三线及以上(2例)。方案包括:ICI单药治疗(n = 4例)、ICI +化疗(n = 4)、ICI +靶向治疗(n = 8)、ICI +抗her2 ADC (RC48) (n = 1)。中位随访29个月,中位OS为42个月。全身ICI治疗的ORR为43.8%,疾病控制率(DCR)为81.3%。值得注意的是,靶向免疫治疗组合的ORR为50%。1例患者获得部分缓解(PR),三线ICI + RC48 (PFS 8个月)。两个例外病例分别获得了超过56个月和64个月的持续完全缓解(CR)。36.4%的患者发生≥3级trae,无治疗相关死亡。结论:这项回顾性分析提供了初步证据,表明基于ci的治疗,特别是靶向免疫治疗组合,在CDC患者中显示出有希望的抗肿瘤活性和可管理的安全性,其中一些获得了深度和持久的反应。观察到的靶向免疫治疗的疗效(ORR为50%)和抗her2 ADC的潜在信号值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immunotherapy-based treatment in renal collecting duct carcinoma: A retrospective case series analysis.

Objective: Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC), a rare and aggressive renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtype, lacks effective standard therapies for advanced stages. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard in clear cell RCC (ccRCC), their role in CDC is poorly defined, supported mainly by case reports. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ICI-based therapy in CDC patients.

Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective case series included 11 pathologically confirmed CDC patients treated with ICI-based regimens between January 2015 and December 2024. Primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; CTCAE v5.0).

Results: Median age was 59 years; 81.8% were male. Ten patients with metastatic disease and received immunotherapy as systemic treatment, while one received it as adjuvant therapy. Lines of immunotherapy-based treatment included: first-line (9 instances), second-line (4 instances), and third-line or beyond (2 instances). Regimens included: ICI monotherapy (n = 4 instances), ICI + chemotherapy (n = 4), ICI + targeted therapy (n = 8), and ICI + anti-HER2 ADC (RC48) (n = 1). With a median follow-up of 29 months, median OS was 42 months. Systemic ICI therapy yielded an ORR of 43.8% and disease control rate (DCR) of 81.3%. Notably, targeted-immunotherapy combinations demonstrated an ORR of 50%. One patient achieved partial response (PR) with third-line ICI + RC48 (PFS 8 months). Two exceptional cases achieved sustained complete responses (CR) exceeding 56 and 64 months, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 36.4% of patients, managed without treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion: This retrospective analysis provides preliminary evidence that ICI-based therapy, particularly targeted-immunotherapy combinations, exhibits promising antitumor activity and manageable safety in CDC patients, with some achieving deep and durable responses. The observed efficacy of targeted-immunotherapy (ORR 50%) and the potential signal with anti-HER2 ADC warrant further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信