利用电子病历数据和最新的临床指南,高度准确和实用的临床糖尿病药物和剂量推荐系统。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Jhing-Fa Wang, Ming-Jun Wei, Te-Ming Chiang, Tzu-Chun Yeh, Eric Cheng, Yuan-Teh Lee, Hong-I Chen
{"title":"利用电子病历数据和最新的临床指南,高度准确和实用的临床糖尿病药物和剂量推荐系统。","authors":"Jhing-Fa Wang, Ming-Jun Wei, Te-Ming Chiang, Tzu-Chun Yeh, Eric Cheng, Yuan-Teh Lee, Hong-I Chen","doi":"10.1055/a-2707-2862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing drug recommendation systems lack integration with up-to-date clinical guidelines (the latest diabetes association standards of care and clinical guidelines that align with local government health care regulations) and lack high-precision drug interaction processing, explainability, and dynamic dosage adjustment. As a result, the recommendations generated by these systems are often inaccurate and do not align with local standards, greatly limiting their practicality.To develop a personalized drug recommendation and dosage optimization system named Diabetes Drug Recommendation System (DDRs), integrating Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources-standardized electronic health record (EHR) data and up-to-date clinical guidelines for accurate and practical recommendations.We analyzed patients' EHR and International Classification of Diseases-tenth edition codes and integrated them with a drug interaction database to reduce adverse reactions. ADA guidelines and Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) chronic disease guidelines served as data sources. Bio-GPT and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) were used to build the clinical guideline database and ensure recommendations align with the latest standards, with references provided for interpretability. Finally, optimal dosage was dynamically calculated by integrating patient disease progression trends from the EHR.DDRs achieved superior drug recommendation accuracy (Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve = 0.7951, Jaccard = 0.5632, F1-score = 0.7158), with a low drug-drug interaction rate (4.73%) and dosage error (±6.21%). Faithfulness of recommendations reached 0.850. Field validation with three physicians showed that the system reduced literature review time by 30 to 40% and delivered clinically actionable recommendations.DDRs is the first system to integrate EHR data, LLMs, RAG, ADA guidelines, and Taiwan NHI policies for diabetes treatment. The system demonstrates high accuracy, safety, and interpretability, offering practical decision support in routine clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49822,"journal":{"name":"Methods of Information in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data and Up-to-Date Clinical Guidelines for High-Accuracy Clinical Diabetes Drug and Dosage Recommendation.\",\"authors\":\"Jhing-Fa Wang, Ming-Jun Wei, Te-Ming Chiang, Tzu-Chun Yeh, Eric Cheng, Yuan-Teh Lee, Hong-I Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2707-2862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Existing drug recommendation systems lack integration with up-to-date clinical guidelines (the latest diabetes association standards of care and clinical guidelines that align with local government health care regulations) and lack high-precision drug interaction processing, explainability, and dynamic dosage adjustment. As a result, the recommendations generated by these systems are often inaccurate and do not align with local standards, greatly limiting their practicality.To develop a personalized drug recommendation and dosage optimization system named Diabetes Drug Recommendation System (DDRs), integrating Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources-standardized electronic health record (EHR) data and up-to-date clinical guidelines for accurate and practical recommendations.We analyzed patients' EHR and International Classification of Diseases-tenth edition codes and integrated them with a drug interaction database to reduce adverse reactions. ADA guidelines and Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) chronic disease guidelines served as data sources. Bio-GPT and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) were used to build the clinical guideline database and ensure recommendations align with the latest standards, with references provided for interpretability. Finally, optimal dosage was dynamically calculated by integrating patient disease progression trends from the EHR.DDRs achieved superior drug recommendation accuracy (Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve = 0.7951, Jaccard = 0.5632, F1-score = 0.7158), with a low drug-drug interaction rate (4.73%) and dosage error (±6.21%). Faithfulness of recommendations reached 0.850. Field validation with three physicians showed that the system reduced literature review time by 30 to 40% and delivered clinically actionable recommendations.DDRs is the first system to integrate EHR data, LLMs, RAG, ADA guidelines, and Taiwan NHI policies for diabetes treatment. The system demonstrates high accuracy, safety, and interpretability, offering practical decision support in routine clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods of Information in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods of Information in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2707-2862\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods of Information in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2707-2862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现有的药物推荐系统缺乏与最新临床指南(最新的糖尿病协会护理标准和符合当地政府医疗法规的临床指南)的整合,缺乏高精度的药物相互作用处理、可解释性和动态剂量调整。因此,这些系统产生的建议往往是不准确的,与当地标准不一致,极大地限制了它们的实用性。目的:开发糖尿病药物推荐系统(DDRs),整合fhir标准化EHR数据和最新临床指南,提供准确实用的推荐。方法:分析患者的EHR和ICD-10代码,并将其与药物相互作用数据库进行整合,以减少不良反应。ADA指南和台湾NHI慢性病指南作为数据来源。使用Bio-GPT和RAG建立临床指南数据库,确保建议与最新标准一致,并提供可解释性参考文献。最后,通过整合来自EHR的患者疾病进展趋势,动态计算最佳剂量。结果:DDRs具有较好的推荐准确率(PRAUC = 0.7951, Jaccard = 0.5632, f1评分= 0.7158),DDI率(4.73%)和剂量误差(±6.21%)较低。推荐信度达到0.850。三名医生的现场验证表明,该系统将文献回顾时间缩短了30-40%,并提供了临床可操作的建议。结论:ddr是第一个整合EHR数据、LLMs、RAG、ADA指南和台湾NHI政策的糖尿病治疗系统。该系统具有较高的准确性、安全性和可解释性,可在常规临床环境中提供实用的决策支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data and Up-to-Date Clinical Guidelines for High-Accuracy Clinical Diabetes Drug and Dosage Recommendation.

Existing drug recommendation systems lack integration with up-to-date clinical guidelines (the latest diabetes association standards of care and clinical guidelines that align with local government health care regulations) and lack high-precision drug interaction processing, explainability, and dynamic dosage adjustment. As a result, the recommendations generated by these systems are often inaccurate and do not align with local standards, greatly limiting their practicality.To develop a personalized drug recommendation and dosage optimization system named Diabetes Drug Recommendation System (DDRs), integrating Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources-standardized electronic health record (EHR) data and up-to-date clinical guidelines for accurate and practical recommendations.We analyzed patients' EHR and International Classification of Diseases-tenth edition codes and integrated them with a drug interaction database to reduce adverse reactions. ADA guidelines and Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) chronic disease guidelines served as data sources. Bio-GPT and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) were used to build the clinical guideline database and ensure recommendations align with the latest standards, with references provided for interpretability. Finally, optimal dosage was dynamically calculated by integrating patient disease progression trends from the EHR.DDRs achieved superior drug recommendation accuracy (Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve = 0.7951, Jaccard = 0.5632, F1-score = 0.7158), with a low drug-drug interaction rate (4.73%) and dosage error (±6.21%). Faithfulness of recommendations reached 0.850. Field validation with three physicians showed that the system reduced literature review time by 30 to 40% and delivered clinically actionable recommendations.DDRs is the first system to integrate EHR data, LLMs, RAG, ADA guidelines, and Taiwan NHI policies for diabetes treatment. The system demonstrates high accuracy, safety, and interpretability, offering practical decision support in routine clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods of Information in Medicine
Methods of Information in Medicine 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Good medicine and good healthcare demand good information. Since the journal''s founding in 1962, Methods of Information in Medicine has stressed the methodology and scientific fundamentals of organizing, representing and analyzing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. Covering publications in the fields of biomedical and health informatics, medical biometry, and epidemiology, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, reports, opinion papers, editorials, and letters to the editor. From time to time, the journal publishes articles on particular focus themes as part of a journal''s issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信