胆囊内与静脉注射吲哚菁绿对腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆道解剖可视化的影响:一项随机对照研究。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Anubhav Vindal, Durlabh J Gogoi, Manu Vats, Pawanindra Lal
{"title":"胆囊内与静脉注射吲哚菁绿对腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆道解剖可视化的影响:一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Anubhav Vindal, Durlabh J Gogoi, Manu Vats, Pawanindra Lal","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12164-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of Indocyanine green (ICG) dye and near infrared fluorescence has been recently described for visualizing the extrahepatic biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The popular route for administration of ICG is intravenous (IV), 30-60 min before surgery. Direct injection of ICG into gall bladder (intracholecystic) (IC) is not commonly used. This study is designed to compare these two routes of ICG for visualization of extrahepatic biliary anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods and procedure: </strong>Forty patients undergoing elective LC were included and randomized into two groups of 20 patients each: IV-ICG and IC-ICG. In the IV-ICG group, ICG was administered in a dose of 0.01 mg/kg, 30-45 min before induction of anesthesia. In the IC-ICG group, ICG was injected directly into the gall bladder fundus using an 18-gauge needle. The two groups were compared with respect to the time of appearance of fluorescence in the biliary tree. A 5-point score was designed to compare the visualization of the biliary anatomy in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean visualization score in the IV-ICG group was 4.25 ± 1.17, while that in the IC-ICG group was 4.1 ± 1.18. The cystic duct could be delineated pre-dissection in 70% patients in IV-ICG and in 85% patients in IC-ICG, which changed to 85% and 95%, respectively, after dissection of Calot's triangle. IV-ICG was found to be better at delineating the common hepatic duct (85%) compared to IC-ICG (45%), while CBD could be seen in 95% and 100% patients, respectively. Two patients in the IC-ICG group had minor leakage of bile from the puncture hole in the fundus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that the IC-ICG provides a faster visualization of extrahepatic biliary ducts during LC, with a better signal-to-background ratio compared to the IV-ICG. It can be utilized immediately without the need to wait for the dye to be excreted by the liver.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracholecystic versus intravenous indocyanine green for visualization of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Anubhav Vindal, Durlabh J Gogoi, Manu Vats, Pawanindra Lal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-12164-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of Indocyanine green (ICG) dye and near infrared fluorescence has been recently described for visualizing the extrahepatic biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The popular route for administration of ICG is intravenous (IV), 30-60 min before surgery. Direct injection of ICG into gall bladder (intracholecystic) (IC) is not commonly used. This study is designed to compare these two routes of ICG for visualization of extrahepatic biliary anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods and procedure: </strong>Forty patients undergoing elective LC were included and randomized into two groups of 20 patients each: IV-ICG and IC-ICG. In the IV-ICG group, ICG was administered in a dose of 0.01 mg/kg, 30-45 min before induction of anesthesia. In the IC-ICG group, ICG was injected directly into the gall bladder fundus using an 18-gauge needle. The two groups were compared with respect to the time of appearance of fluorescence in the biliary tree. A 5-point score was designed to compare the visualization of the biliary anatomy in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean visualization score in the IV-ICG group was 4.25 ± 1.17, while that in the IC-ICG group was 4.1 ± 1.18. The cystic duct could be delineated pre-dissection in 70% patients in IV-ICG and in 85% patients in IC-ICG, which changed to 85% and 95%, respectively, after dissection of Calot's triangle. IV-ICG was found to be better at delineating the common hepatic duct (85%) compared to IC-ICG (45%), while CBD could be seen in 95% and 100% patients, respectively. Two patients in the IC-ICG group had minor leakage of bile from the puncture hole in the fundus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that the IC-ICG provides a faster visualization of extrahepatic biliary ducts during LC, with a better signal-to-background ratio compared to the IV-ICG. It can be utilized immediately without the need to wait for the dye to be excreted by the liver.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12164-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12164-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近报道了在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中使用吲哚菁绿(ICG)染料和近红外荧光来观察肝外胆道解剖。ICG的常用给药途径是静脉(IV),术前30-60分钟。直接在胆囊内注射ICG (intracolecystic) (IC)并不常用。本研究旨在比较这两种路径的ICG对肝外胆道解剖的可视化效果。方法和程序:40例选择性LC患者随机分为两组,每组20例:IV-ICG和IC-ICG。IV-ICG组在麻醉诱导前30-45 min给药,剂量为0.01 mg/kg。在IC-ICG组中,使用18号针将ICG直接注射到胆囊底。比较两组患者胆道树荧光出现时间。设计了一个5分的评分来比较两组胆道解剖的可视化。结果:IV-ICG组平均视觉评分为4.25±1.17分,IC-ICG组平均视觉评分为4.1±1.18分。在IV-ICG和IC-ICG中,分别有70%和85%的患者能在剥离前勾画出囊管,而在Calot三角区剥离后,这一比例分别为85%和95%。与IC-ICG(45%)相比,IV-ICG(85%)在描绘肝总管方面优于IC-ICG(45%),而CBD分别在95%和100%的患者中可见。IC-ICG组有2例患者有少量胆汁从眼底穿刺孔渗漏。结论:本研究发现,与IV-ICG相比,IC-ICG在LC期间提供了更快的肝外胆管可视化,具有更好的信本比。它可以立即使用,而不需要等待染料被肝脏排出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intracholecystic versus intravenous indocyanine green for visualization of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.

Background: Use of Indocyanine green (ICG) dye and near infrared fluorescence has been recently described for visualizing the extrahepatic biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The popular route for administration of ICG is intravenous (IV), 30-60 min before surgery. Direct injection of ICG into gall bladder (intracholecystic) (IC) is not commonly used. This study is designed to compare these two routes of ICG for visualization of extrahepatic biliary anatomy.

Methods and procedure: Forty patients undergoing elective LC were included and randomized into two groups of 20 patients each: IV-ICG and IC-ICG. In the IV-ICG group, ICG was administered in a dose of 0.01 mg/kg, 30-45 min before induction of anesthesia. In the IC-ICG group, ICG was injected directly into the gall bladder fundus using an 18-gauge needle. The two groups were compared with respect to the time of appearance of fluorescence in the biliary tree. A 5-point score was designed to compare the visualization of the biliary anatomy in the two groups.

Results: The mean visualization score in the IV-ICG group was 4.25 ± 1.17, while that in the IC-ICG group was 4.1 ± 1.18. The cystic duct could be delineated pre-dissection in 70% patients in IV-ICG and in 85% patients in IC-ICG, which changed to 85% and 95%, respectively, after dissection of Calot's triangle. IV-ICG was found to be better at delineating the common hepatic duct (85%) compared to IC-ICG (45%), while CBD could be seen in 95% and 100% patients, respectively. Two patients in the IC-ICG group had minor leakage of bile from the puncture hole in the fundus.

Conclusions: This study found that the IC-ICG provides a faster visualization of extrahepatic biliary ducts during LC, with a better signal-to-background ratio compared to the IV-ICG. It can be utilized immediately without the need to wait for the dye to be excreted by the liver.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信