慢性疼痛患者口服氯胺酮的不良反应评价。

IF 1.4 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_87_25
Brian Hom, Diane McIntee, Yao-Ping Zhang, Jacob S Hershenhouse, Austin Nash, Steven Richeimer
{"title":"慢性疼痛患者口服氯胺酮的不良反应评价。","authors":"Brian Hom, Diane McIntee, Yao-Ping Zhang, Jacob S Hershenhouse, Austin Nash, Steven Richeimer","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_87_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ketamine has been shown to be an effective treatment at sub-anesthetic doses for various chronic pain conditions. This study assesses the relationship between oral ketamine and the incidence of adverse side effects in patients receiving long-term, moderate to high-dose tablets for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All adult patients given prescriptions for oral ketamine from November 2019 to October 2023 were identified for our initial cohort. Patients were excluded if they failed to reach at least 80 mg per day during their treatment period or if their treatment periods lasted less than 90 days. Demographic variables, comorbidities, prescription information, and patient-reported side effects were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study identified 193 patients who received oral ketamine prescriptions at our institution. One hundred forty-nine patients received 80 mg-159 mg per day, 24 patients received 160 mg-199 mg per day, and 20 patients received 200 mg-240 mg per day. In Group 1, 9 of the 149 patients (6.0%) reported 12 instances of side effects; in Group 2, 2 of the 24 patients (8.3%) reported 6 instances of side effects; in Group 3, 2 of the 20 patients (10%) reported 2 instances of side effects. The maximum average daily dosage was not associated with the number of reported side effects (<i>P</i> = 0.10). Age was the only covariate associated with the number of adverse side effects (<i>P</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that at daily doses above 80 mg and up to 240 mg, oral ketamine does not show a dose-dependent relationship in predicting the number of patient-reported side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"19 4","pages":"546-552"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating oral ketamine's adverse side effects in chronic pain patients.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Hom, Diane McIntee, Yao-Ping Zhang, Jacob S Hershenhouse, Austin Nash, Steven Richeimer\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sja.sja_87_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ketamine has been shown to be an effective treatment at sub-anesthetic doses for various chronic pain conditions. This study assesses the relationship between oral ketamine and the incidence of adverse side effects in patients receiving long-term, moderate to high-dose tablets for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All adult patients given prescriptions for oral ketamine from November 2019 to October 2023 were identified for our initial cohort. Patients were excluded if they failed to reach at least 80 mg per day during their treatment period or if their treatment periods lasted less than 90 days. Demographic variables, comorbidities, prescription information, and patient-reported side effects were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study identified 193 patients who received oral ketamine prescriptions at our institution. One hundred forty-nine patients received 80 mg-159 mg per day, 24 patients received 160 mg-199 mg per day, and 20 patients received 200 mg-240 mg per day. In Group 1, 9 of the 149 patients (6.0%) reported 12 instances of side effects; in Group 2, 2 of the 24 patients (8.3%) reported 6 instances of side effects; in Group 3, 2 of the 20 patients (10%) reported 2 instances of side effects. The maximum average daily dosage was not associated with the number of reported side effects (<i>P</i> = 0.10). Age was the only covariate associated with the number of adverse side effects (<i>P</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that at daily doses above 80 mg and up to 240 mg, oral ketamine does not show a dose-dependent relationship in predicting the number of patient-reported side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"546-552\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456614/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_87_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_87_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:氯胺酮已被证明是一种有效的治疗亚麻醉剂量的各种慢性疼痛条件。本研究评估了长期、中剂量至高剂量口服氯胺酮片治疗慢性疼痛患者的不良反应发生率与口服氯胺酮的关系。材料和方法:将2019年11月至2023年10月期间服用口服氯胺酮的所有成年患者纳入我们的初始队列。如果患者在治疗期间不能达到每天至少80毫克,或者如果他们的治疗持续时间少于90天,则将患者排除在外。记录人口统计变量、合并症、处方信息和患者报告的副作用。结果:本研究确定了193例在我院接受口服氯胺酮处方的患者。149名患者每天服用80毫克至159毫克,24名患者每天服用160毫克至199毫克,20名患者每天服用200毫克至240毫克。在第1组,149例患者中有9例(6.0%)报告了12例副作用;在第2组,24例患者中有2例(8.3%)报告了6例不良反应;在第3组,20例患者中有2例(10%)报告了2例副作用。最大平均日剂量与报告的副作用数无关(P = 0.10)。年龄是与不良反应数量相关的唯一协变量(P = 0.04)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在每日剂量高于80mg和高达240mg时,口服氯胺酮在预测患者报告的副作用数量方面没有剂量依赖关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating oral ketamine's adverse side effects in chronic pain patients.

Evaluating oral ketamine's adverse side effects in chronic pain patients.

Background: Ketamine has been shown to be an effective treatment at sub-anesthetic doses for various chronic pain conditions. This study assesses the relationship between oral ketamine and the incidence of adverse side effects in patients receiving long-term, moderate to high-dose tablets for chronic pain.

Materials and methods: All adult patients given prescriptions for oral ketamine from November 2019 to October 2023 were identified for our initial cohort. Patients were excluded if they failed to reach at least 80 mg per day during their treatment period or if their treatment periods lasted less than 90 days. Demographic variables, comorbidities, prescription information, and patient-reported side effects were recorded.

Results: This study identified 193 patients who received oral ketamine prescriptions at our institution. One hundred forty-nine patients received 80 mg-159 mg per day, 24 patients received 160 mg-199 mg per day, and 20 patients received 200 mg-240 mg per day. In Group 1, 9 of the 149 patients (6.0%) reported 12 instances of side effects; in Group 2, 2 of the 24 patients (8.3%) reported 6 instances of side effects; in Group 3, 2 of the 20 patients (10%) reported 2 instances of side effects. The maximum average daily dosage was not associated with the number of reported side effects (P = 0.10). Age was the only covariate associated with the number of adverse side effects (P = 0.04).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that at daily doses above 80 mg and up to 240 mg, oral ketamine does not show a dose-dependent relationship in predicting the number of patient-reported side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信