MELD 3.0和ReMELD-Na评分系统的验证:一项德国临床队列研究

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Aghnia J Putri, Decan Jiang, Zoltan Czigany, Arianeb Mehrabi, Markus Wolfgang Buechler, Uta Merle, Christoph Michalski, Peri Husen
{"title":"MELD 3.0和ReMELD-Na评分系统的验证:一项德国临床队列研究","authors":"Aghnia J Putri, Decan Jiang, Zoltan Czigany, Arianeb Mehrabi, Markus Wolfgang Buechler, Uta Merle, Christoph Michalski, Peri Husen","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03846-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, introduced in 2002, has since been refined. MELD 3.0, launched in 2023 in the United States, improves mortality prediction by incorporating sex and albumin. Since March 2025, Germany started to use reMELD-Na to improve prioritization of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT). This study compares the performance of original MELD, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0 with and without albumin, and reMELD-Na for patients waitlisted for LT in a large German transplant center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 206 listed patients from 2017 to 2021 for LT. Reclassification patterns along with predictive accuracy for three-month survival and overall survival (OS) of five different MELD scores were assessed using Harrell's c-index and integrated area under the curve (iAUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 33.9 months, 100 patients (51.5%) underwent LT, with a post-transplant survival rate of 70%. Thirty-eight patients (18.4%) received LT and sixteen patients died within the first three months after listing. ReMELD-Na and MELD 3.0 without albumin demonstrated the highest discrimination for three-month survival (c-index 0.848 and 0.827, respectively). Original MELD showed the poorest discrimination. MELD 3.0 without albumin showed the best overall performance in predicting OS (c-index 0.827) in males, while reMELD-Na performed best in females (c-index 0.705). Females with higher original MELD scores tended to receive even higher scores with MELD 3.0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first German study to validate reMELD-Na and MELD 3.0, showing superior predictive performance over original MELD. MELD 3.0 may better reflect disease severity in women at advanced stages due to more upward reclassification.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of MELD 3.0 and ReMELD-Na scoring systems: a German clinical cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Aghnia J Putri, Decan Jiang, Zoltan Czigany, Arianeb Mehrabi, Markus Wolfgang Buechler, Uta Merle, Christoph Michalski, Peri Husen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03846-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, introduced in 2002, has since been refined. MELD 3.0, launched in 2023 in the United States, improves mortality prediction by incorporating sex and albumin. Since March 2025, Germany started to use reMELD-Na to improve prioritization of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT). This study compares the performance of original MELD, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0 with and without albumin, and reMELD-Na for patients waitlisted for LT in a large German transplant center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 206 listed patients from 2017 to 2021 for LT. Reclassification patterns along with predictive accuracy for three-month survival and overall survival (OS) of five different MELD scores were assessed using Harrell's c-index and integrated area under the curve (iAUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 33.9 months, 100 patients (51.5%) underwent LT, with a post-transplant survival rate of 70%. Thirty-eight patients (18.4%) received LT and sixteen patients died within the first three months after listing. ReMELD-Na and MELD 3.0 without albumin demonstrated the highest discrimination for three-month survival (c-index 0.848 and 0.827, respectively). Original MELD showed the poorest discrimination. MELD 3.0 without albumin showed the best overall performance in predicting OS (c-index 0.827) in males, while reMELD-Na performed best in females (c-index 0.705). Females with higher original MELD scores tended to receive even higher scores with MELD 3.0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first German study to validate reMELD-Na and MELD 3.0, showing superior predictive performance over original MELD. MELD 3.0 may better reflect disease severity in women at advanced stages due to more upward reclassification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464064/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03846-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03846-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:终末期肝病(MELD)评分模型于2002年引入,此后不断完善。MELD 3.0于2023年在美国推出,通过纳入性别和白蛋白来改善死亡率预测。自2025年3月起,德国开始使用reMELD-Na来改善肝移植(LT)等待名单上患者的优先级。本研究比较了在德国一家大型移植中心等待肝移植的患者使用原始MELD、MELD- na、MELD 3.0(含白蛋白和不含白蛋白)和reMELD-Na的表现。方法:这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了2017年至2021年206例列出的lt患者。重新分类模式以及五个不同MELD评分的三个月生存期和总生存期(OS)的预测准确性使用Harrell's c指数和综合曲线下面积(iAUC)进行评估。结果:在33.9个月的中位随访中,100例患者(51.5%)接受了肝移植,移植后生存率为70%。38例患者(18.4%)接受了肝移植,16例患者在上市后的前三个月内死亡。不含白蛋白的ReMELD-Na和MELD 3.0对3个月生存率的鉴别性最高(c指数分别为0.848和0.827)。原始MELD的歧视程度最低。不含白蛋白的MELD 3.0对男性OS的综合预测效果最好(c-index为0.827),而reMELD-Na对女性OS的综合预测效果最好(c-index为0.705)。原始MELD得分较高的女性在MELD达到3.0时得分更高。结论:这是德国首次验证reMELD-Na和MELD 3.0的研究,其预测性能优于原始MELD。由于更多的向上重新分类,MELD 3.0可能更好地反映晚期妇女的疾病严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of MELD 3.0 and ReMELD-Na scoring systems: a German clinical cohort study.

Background: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, introduced in 2002, has since been refined. MELD 3.0, launched in 2023 in the United States, improves mortality prediction by incorporating sex and albumin. Since March 2025, Germany started to use reMELD-Na to improve prioritization of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT). This study compares the performance of original MELD, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0 with and without albumin, and reMELD-Na for patients waitlisted for LT in a large German transplant center.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 206 listed patients from 2017 to 2021 for LT. Reclassification patterns along with predictive accuracy for three-month survival and overall survival (OS) of five different MELD scores were assessed using Harrell's c-index and integrated area under the curve (iAUC).

Results: Over a median follow-up of 33.9 months, 100 patients (51.5%) underwent LT, with a post-transplant survival rate of 70%. Thirty-eight patients (18.4%) received LT and sixteen patients died within the first three months after listing. ReMELD-Na and MELD 3.0 without albumin demonstrated the highest discrimination for three-month survival (c-index 0.848 and 0.827, respectively). Original MELD showed the poorest discrimination. MELD 3.0 without albumin showed the best overall performance in predicting OS (c-index 0.827) in males, while reMELD-Na performed best in females (c-index 0.705). Females with higher original MELD scores tended to receive even higher scores with MELD 3.0.

Conclusion: This is the first German study to validate reMELD-Na and MELD 3.0, showing superior predictive performance over original MELD. MELD 3.0 may better reflect disease severity in women at advanced stages due to more upward reclassification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信