Tarita Murray-Thomas, Alex Bottle, Jamil Mayet, Puja Myles
{"title":"全科医生对心力衰竭患者不遵医嘱服药:患病率、危险因素及其与死亡率和住院率的关系","authors":"Tarita Murray-Thomas, Alex Bottle, Jamil Mayet, Puja Myles","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In the UK, pharmacological management of patients with heart failure (HF) occurs predominantly in general practice. Using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we examined the prevalence and risk factors for medication non-adherence and its association with hospitalisation and mortality over a 9-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 127 927 patients, ≥18 years old in England with incident HF diagnosed during 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018. We evaluated non-adherence to any ACE inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, β-blocker or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, over 24 months. Non-adherence was based on proportion of days covered (PDC) and defined as PDC<80%. Risk factors for non-adherence and all-cause mortality were examined using multiple logistic regression and Cox regression, respectively. Rates of any-cause emergency hospitalisations, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and HF mortality was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risk models. PDC was also assessed as a continuous variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 43.6% of patients were non-adherent to therapy. Crude rates of emergency admissions, all-cause, CVD and HF mortality overall were 306.8/1000, 119.6/1000, 44.6/1000 and 3.3/1000 person-years, respectively. The strongest predictor of non-adherence was any-cause hospitalisation ≤12 months prior. Non-adherence was associated with a higher rate of all-cause mortality (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.33) and significantly associated with CVD-related mortality (subdistribution HR (SHR) 1.20, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.23), HF deaths (SHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32) and any-cause emergency admissions (SHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.13). In the analysis treating PDC as a continuous variable, every 10% decrease in PDC levels was associated with a 6% increased hazard of all-cause mortality (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.06) and was significantly associated with CVD, but not HF mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medication non-adherence over 24 months was relatively high and associated with poorer health outcomes. Interventions to improve adherence among patients with HF are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-adherence to medications prescribed to patients with heart failure in general practice: prevalence, risk factors and association with mortality and hospitalisation.\",\"authors\":\"Tarita Murray-Thomas, Alex Bottle, Jamil Mayet, Puja Myles\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In the UK, pharmacological management of patients with heart failure (HF) occurs predominantly in general practice. Using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we examined the prevalence and risk factors for medication non-adherence and its association with hospitalisation and mortality over a 9-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 127 927 patients, ≥18 years old in England with incident HF diagnosed during 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018. We evaluated non-adherence to any ACE inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, β-blocker or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, over 24 months. Non-adherence was based on proportion of days covered (PDC) and defined as PDC<80%. Risk factors for non-adherence and all-cause mortality were examined using multiple logistic regression and Cox regression, respectively. Rates of any-cause emergency hospitalisations, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and HF mortality was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risk models. PDC was also assessed as a continuous variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 43.6% of patients were non-adherent to therapy. Crude rates of emergency admissions, all-cause, CVD and HF mortality overall were 306.8/1000, 119.6/1000, 44.6/1000 and 3.3/1000 person-years, respectively. The strongest predictor of non-adherence was any-cause hospitalisation ≤12 months prior. Non-adherence was associated with a higher rate of all-cause mortality (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.33) and significantly associated with CVD-related mortality (subdistribution HR (SHR) 1.20, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.23), HF deaths (SHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32) and any-cause emergency admissions (SHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.13). In the analysis treating PDC as a continuous variable, every 10% decrease in PDC levels was associated with a 6% increased hazard of all-cause mortality (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.06) and was significantly associated with CVD, but not HF mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medication non-adherence over 24 months was relatively high and associated with poorer health outcomes. Interventions to improve adherence among patients with HF are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458725/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在英国,心力衰竭(HF)患者的药理学管理主要发生在一般实践中。使用临床实践研究数据链的数据,我们检查了9年期间药物不依从性的患病率和危险因素及其与住院和死亡率的关系。方法:对2009年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间诊断为心衰事件的127927例英国≥18岁患者进行回顾性队列研究。我们评估了超过24个月的ACE抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂或矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂的无依从性。不依从性是基于覆盖天数(PDC)的比例,并定义为pdcres结果:约43.6%的患者不坚持治疗。急诊入院率、全因死亡率、心血管疾病死亡率和心力衰竭死亡率总体分别为306.8/1000、119.6/1000、44.6/1000和3.3/1000人年。不依从性的最强预测因子是任何原因住院≤12个月。不依从性与较高的全因死亡率(HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.28 ~ 1.33)相关,并与心血管疾病相关死亡率(亚分布HR (SHR) 1.20, 95% CI 1.16 ~ 1.23)、心衰死亡(SHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 ~ 1.32)和任何原因急诊入院(SHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.10 ~ 1.13)显著相关。在将PDC作为连续变量进行的分析中,PDC水平每降低10%,全因死亡率风险增加6% (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.06),与CVD显著相关,但与HF死亡率无关。结论:24个月以上的药物依从性相对较高,且与较差的健康结果相关。需要采取干预措施提高心衰患者的依从性。
Non-adherence to medications prescribed to patients with heart failure in general practice: prevalence, risk factors and association with mortality and hospitalisation.
Aim: In the UK, pharmacological management of patients with heart failure (HF) occurs predominantly in general practice. Using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we examined the prevalence and risk factors for medication non-adherence and its association with hospitalisation and mortality over a 9-year period.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 127 927 patients, ≥18 years old in England with incident HF diagnosed during 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018. We evaluated non-adherence to any ACE inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, β-blocker or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, over 24 months. Non-adherence was based on proportion of days covered (PDC) and defined as PDC<80%. Risk factors for non-adherence and all-cause mortality were examined using multiple logistic regression and Cox regression, respectively. Rates of any-cause emergency hospitalisations, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and HF mortality was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risk models. PDC was also assessed as a continuous variable.
Results: About 43.6% of patients were non-adherent to therapy. Crude rates of emergency admissions, all-cause, CVD and HF mortality overall were 306.8/1000, 119.6/1000, 44.6/1000 and 3.3/1000 person-years, respectively. The strongest predictor of non-adherence was any-cause hospitalisation ≤12 months prior. Non-adherence was associated with a higher rate of all-cause mortality (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.33) and significantly associated with CVD-related mortality (subdistribution HR (SHR) 1.20, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.23), HF deaths (SHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32) and any-cause emergency admissions (SHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.13). In the analysis treating PDC as a continuous variable, every 10% decrease in PDC levels was associated with a 6% increased hazard of all-cause mortality (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.06) and was significantly associated with CVD, but not HF mortality.
Conclusion: Medication non-adherence over 24 months was relatively high and associated with poorer health outcomes. Interventions to improve adherence among patients with HF are needed.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.