用西米单抗治疗一线非小细胞肺癌PD-L1免疫组化检测的临床互换性

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI:10.1200/PO-25-00177
Javier Perez, Keith M Kerr, Brian Baker, Fang Fang, Jason Li, Jannine McDonald, Siyu Li, Bo Gao, Jean-Francois Pouliot, Frank Seebach, Israel Lowy, Giuseppe Gullo, Gary Herman, Jennifer Hamilton, Petra Rietschel, Kristina McGuire
{"title":"用西米单抗治疗一线非小细胞肺癌PD-L1免疫组化检测的临床互换性","authors":"Javier Perez, Keith M Kerr, Brian Baker, Fang Fang, Jason Li, Jannine McDonald, Siyu Li, Bo Gao, Jean-Francois Pouliot, Frank Seebach, Israel Lowy, Giuseppe Gullo, Gary Herman, Jennifer Hamilton, Petra Rietschel, Kristina McGuire","doi":"10.1200/PO-25-00177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multiple immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays targeting PD-L1 have been developed independently, and a lack of harmonization creates undue complexity for clinicians who use PD-L1 tests to guide treatment decisions. This novel bridging study demonstrates the clinical interchangeability of two PD-L1 IHC assays in first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 ≥50%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the phase III EMPOWER-Lung 1 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03088540), 710 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line cemiplimab or platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50%, selected by PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 871 patient samples were retrospectively tested using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), including 481 enrolled patients and 390 patients who did not pass screening (22C3 PD-L1 <50%). Concordance of 22C3 and SP263 was evaluated in 768 patient samples, with an overall percent agreement (concordance) of 88% between the two assays. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated in the PD-L1 ≥50% SP263+ population (including the 22C3+/SP263+ and 22C3-/SP263+ subpopulations). In the primary analysis, the clinical efficacy of cemiplimab versus chemotherapy in the 22C3+/SP263+ population (n = 324; OS hazard ratio [HR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.80]; PFS HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.59]) was similar to that in the 22C3+ population (n = 563). A sensitivity analysis of the overall SP263+ population showed consistent results with the primary analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Similar efficacy (OS and PFS) was observed with the 22C3+ and SP263+ populations, demonstrating the interchangeability of these PD-L1 IHC assays for selecting patients with PD-L1 ≥50% for first-line cemiplimab monotherapy for advanced NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2500177"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Interchangeability of PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Assays in First-Line Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Management With Cemiplimab.\",\"authors\":\"Javier Perez, Keith M Kerr, Brian Baker, Fang Fang, Jason Li, Jannine McDonald, Siyu Li, Bo Gao, Jean-Francois Pouliot, Frank Seebach, Israel Lowy, Giuseppe Gullo, Gary Herman, Jennifer Hamilton, Petra Rietschel, Kristina McGuire\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO-25-00177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multiple immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays targeting PD-L1 have been developed independently, and a lack of harmonization creates undue complexity for clinicians who use PD-L1 tests to guide treatment decisions. This novel bridging study demonstrates the clinical interchangeability of two PD-L1 IHC assays in first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 ≥50%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the phase III EMPOWER-Lung 1 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03088540), 710 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line cemiplimab or platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50%, selected by PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 871 patient samples were retrospectively tested using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), including 481 enrolled patients and 390 patients who did not pass screening (22C3 PD-L1 <50%). Concordance of 22C3 and SP263 was evaluated in 768 patient samples, with an overall percent agreement (concordance) of 88% between the two assays. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated in the PD-L1 ≥50% SP263+ population (including the 22C3+/SP263+ and 22C3-/SP263+ subpopulations). In the primary analysis, the clinical efficacy of cemiplimab versus chemotherapy in the 22C3+/SP263+ population (n = 324; OS hazard ratio [HR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.80]; PFS HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.59]) was similar to that in the 22C3+ population (n = 563). A sensitivity analysis of the overall SP263+ population showed consistent results with the primary analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Similar efficacy (OS and PFS) was observed with the 22C3+ and SP263+ populations, demonstrating the interchangeability of these PD-L1 IHC assays for selecting patients with PD-L1 ≥50% for first-line cemiplimab monotherapy for advanced NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2500177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487655/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00177\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:针对PD-L1的多种免疫组织化学(IHC)检测已经独立开发,缺乏一致性给使用PD-L1检测指导治疗决策的临床医生带来了不必要的复杂性。这项新的桥接研究证明了两种PD-L1免疫组化检测在一线治疗PD-L1≥50%的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的临床互换性。方法:在III期EMPOWER-Lung 1研究(ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03088540)中,710名患者被随机1:1分配到PD-L1≥50%的晚期非小细胞肺癌的一线塞米单抗或铂双药化疗,由PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA)选择。结果:共有871例患者样本使用VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263)检测(罗氏诊断公司,印第安纳波利斯)进行回顾性检测,包括481例入组患者和390例未通过筛查的患者(22C3 PD-L1)结论:22C3+和SP263+人群观察到相似的疗效(OS和PFS),证明这些PD-L1 IHC检测在选择PD-L1≥50%的晚期NSCLC患者进行一线西米单抗单药治疗时具有互换性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Interchangeability of PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Assays in First-Line Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Management With Cemiplimab.

Purpose: Multiple immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays targeting PD-L1 have been developed independently, and a lack of harmonization creates undue complexity for clinicians who use PD-L1 tests to guide treatment decisions. This novel bridging study demonstrates the clinical interchangeability of two PD-L1 IHC assays in first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 ≥50%.

Methods: In the phase III EMPOWER-Lung 1 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03088540), 710 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line cemiplimab or platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50%, selected by PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).

Results: A total of 871 patient samples were retrospectively tested using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), including 481 enrolled patients and 390 patients who did not pass screening (22C3 PD-L1 <50%). Concordance of 22C3 and SP263 was evaluated in 768 patient samples, with an overall percent agreement (concordance) of 88% between the two assays. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated in the PD-L1 ≥50% SP263+ population (including the 22C3+/SP263+ and 22C3-/SP263+ subpopulations). In the primary analysis, the clinical efficacy of cemiplimab versus chemotherapy in the 22C3+/SP263+ population (n = 324; OS hazard ratio [HR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.80]; PFS HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.59]) was similar to that in the 22C3+ population (n = 563). A sensitivity analysis of the overall SP263+ population showed consistent results with the primary analysis.

Conclusion: Similar efficacy (OS and PFS) was observed with the 22C3+ and SP263+ populations, demonstrating the interchangeability of these PD-L1 IHC assays for selecting patients with PD-L1 ≥50% for first-line cemiplimab monotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信