乳腺病变的影像引导活检-何时使用何种活检技术。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Wendelien B G Sanderink, Julia Camps-Herrero, Alexandra Athanasiou, Henrique L Couto, Kirti Mehta, Popat Palak Bhavesh Thakkar, Pooja Jagmohan, Sara E Vázquez-Manjarrez, Seigo Nakamura, Jelle Wesseling, Ritse M Mann
{"title":"乳腺病变的影像引导活检-何时使用何种活检技术。","authors":"Wendelien B G Sanderink, Julia Camps-Herrero, Alexandra Athanasiou, Henrique L Couto, Kirti Mehta, Popat Palak Bhavesh Thakkar, Pooja Jagmohan, Sara E Vázquez-Manjarrez, Seigo Nakamura, Jelle Wesseling, Ritse M Mann","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-02084-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, minimally invasive diagnostic options for breast lesions have expanded, but consensus on optimal biopsy techniques and imaging combinations remains lacking. This study, driven by an adapted RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method and insights from eight experts in breast biopsy from across the world, aims to create consensus for selecting biopsy techniques. Highlighted findings suggest Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB) for lesions visible exclusively at mammography/tomosynthesis (with or without contrast enhancement) or MRI. Core-needle biopsy (CNB) takes precedence for masses over 5 mm visible under US. The selection of other biopsy techniques during US-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. VAB is preferred for smaller masses (< 5 mm), complex cystic and solid lesions with small solid parts, small intraductal masses, architectural distortions, and calcifications visible on US. In re-biopsy scenarios for inconclusive findings or high-risk lesions, the panel suggests two VAB extensions: Extended Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (EVAB) for unambiguous lesion classification and Vacuum-Assisted Excision (VAE) for complete lesion removal. Furthermore, the panel provides detailed input on how to handle specific cases, such as re-biopsy for lobular neoplasia, flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Surgical excision is advised for DCIS and benign or borderline phyllodes tumors found through initial CNB or VAB. In conclusion, an international expert group formulated recommendations on diagnostic breast biopsies under image guidance, aiming to ensure accurate diagnosis worldwide by providing practical advice on needle selection and biopsy approach. KEY POINTS: Evidence-based literature on the preferred biopsy technique and imaging combination for the diagnosis of breast lesions is sparse, and a general consensus is not available. The selection of biopsy technique for different image-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. This international expert panel consensus statement addresses standard approaches for varying biopsy indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"208"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image-guided biopsy of breast lesions-when to use what biopsy technique.\",\"authors\":\"Wendelien B G Sanderink, Julia Camps-Herrero, Alexandra Athanasiou, Henrique L Couto, Kirti Mehta, Popat Palak Bhavesh Thakkar, Pooja Jagmohan, Sara E Vázquez-Manjarrez, Seigo Nakamura, Jelle Wesseling, Ritse M Mann\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13244-025-02084-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recent years, minimally invasive diagnostic options for breast lesions have expanded, but consensus on optimal biopsy techniques and imaging combinations remains lacking. This study, driven by an adapted RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method and insights from eight experts in breast biopsy from across the world, aims to create consensus for selecting biopsy techniques. Highlighted findings suggest Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB) for lesions visible exclusively at mammography/tomosynthesis (with or without contrast enhancement) or MRI. Core-needle biopsy (CNB) takes precedence for masses over 5 mm visible under US. The selection of other biopsy techniques during US-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. VAB is preferred for smaller masses (< 5 mm), complex cystic and solid lesions with small solid parts, small intraductal masses, architectural distortions, and calcifications visible on US. In re-biopsy scenarios for inconclusive findings or high-risk lesions, the panel suggests two VAB extensions: Extended Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (EVAB) for unambiguous lesion classification and Vacuum-Assisted Excision (VAE) for complete lesion removal. Furthermore, the panel provides detailed input on how to handle specific cases, such as re-biopsy for lobular neoplasia, flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Surgical excision is advised for DCIS and benign or borderline phyllodes tumors found through initial CNB or VAB. In conclusion, an international expert group formulated recommendations on diagnostic breast biopsies under image guidance, aiming to ensure accurate diagnosis worldwide by providing practical advice on needle selection and biopsy approach. KEY POINTS: Evidence-based literature on the preferred biopsy technique and imaging combination for the diagnosis of breast lesions is sparse, and a general consensus is not available. The selection of biopsy technique for different image-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. This international expert panel consensus statement addresses standard approaches for varying biopsy indications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463797/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02084-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02084-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,乳腺病变的微创诊断选择已经扩大,但关于最佳活检技术和成像组合的共识仍然缺乏。本研究由兰德-加州大学洛杉矶分校的适当性方法和来自世界各地的八位乳腺活检专家的见解推动,旨在为选择活检技术达成共识。突出的发现建议对仅在乳房x线摄影/断层合成(有或没有增强)或MRI上可见的病变进行真空辅助活检(VAB)。超声造影下可见肿块大于5mm时优先采用芯针活检(CNB)。在美国指导的手术过程中,其他活检技术的选择取决于病变类型、大小和采样指征。对于较小的质量,首选VAB (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Image-guided biopsy of breast lesions-when to use what biopsy technique.

In recent years, minimally invasive diagnostic options for breast lesions have expanded, but consensus on optimal biopsy techniques and imaging combinations remains lacking. This study, driven by an adapted RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method and insights from eight experts in breast biopsy from across the world, aims to create consensus for selecting biopsy techniques. Highlighted findings suggest Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB) for lesions visible exclusively at mammography/tomosynthesis (with or without contrast enhancement) or MRI. Core-needle biopsy (CNB) takes precedence for masses over 5 mm visible under US. The selection of other biopsy techniques during US-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. VAB is preferred for smaller masses (< 5 mm), complex cystic and solid lesions with small solid parts, small intraductal masses, architectural distortions, and calcifications visible on US. In re-biopsy scenarios for inconclusive findings or high-risk lesions, the panel suggests two VAB extensions: Extended Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (EVAB) for unambiguous lesion classification and Vacuum-Assisted Excision (VAE) for complete lesion removal. Furthermore, the panel provides detailed input on how to handle specific cases, such as re-biopsy for lobular neoplasia, flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Surgical excision is advised for DCIS and benign or borderline phyllodes tumors found through initial CNB or VAB. In conclusion, an international expert group formulated recommendations on diagnostic breast biopsies under image guidance, aiming to ensure accurate diagnosis worldwide by providing practical advice on needle selection and biopsy approach. KEY POINTS: Evidence-based literature on the preferred biopsy technique and imaging combination for the diagnosis of breast lesions is sparse, and a general consensus is not available. The selection of biopsy technique for different image-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. This international expert panel consensus statement addresses standard approaches for varying biopsy indications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信