数字治疗对储存和排尿LUTS的不同影响:来自BEST随机对照试验的事后IPSS分析

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70069
Sandra Schönburg, Christian Gratzke, Kurt Miller, Erik Krieger, Patrick Papp, Laura Wiemer
{"title":"数字治疗对储存和排尿LUTS的不同影响:来自BEST随机对照试验的事后IPSS分析","authors":"Sandra Schönburg,&nbsp;Christian Gratzke,&nbsp;Kurt Miller,&nbsp;Erik Krieger,&nbsp;Patrick Papp,&nbsp;Laura Wiemer","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate whether storage or voiding symptoms respond more favourably to the use of Kranus Lutera, the first app-based digital therapeutic for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), using detailed item-level analysis of the IPSS questionnaire.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The present data represent a post-hoc analysis of the results of the BEST trial, a randomized controlled study evaluating the efficiency of the digital therapy Kranus Lutera. The study period lasted 12 weeks, conducted between 04/2023 and 11/2023. We assessed the mean change from baseline to 12 weeks for each of the seven IPSS items. Voiding symptoms (items 1, 3, 5 and 6) and storage symptoms (items 2, 4 and 7) were analysed separately.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants using the digital therapeutic demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all IPSS items. Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed a significant and clinically relevant improvement in the primary endpoint (IPSS), with an overall reduction of −7.0 points (95% CI: −8.1 to −5.9, p &lt; 0.0001). Notably, improvements in storage symptoms were consistently larger than those in voiding symptoms. The analysis of individual IPSS questions showed the greatest changes in the overall cohort for questions 1, 2 and 7 (each p &lt; 0.0001). Patients with the single diagnosis BPH (N40) showed the greatest score reduction in questions 2 and 5 (each p &lt; 0.0001), patients with OAB (N32.8) in questions 2, 4 and 7 (each p &lt; 0.0001) and patients with BPH and OAB (N40 + N32.8) in questions 2, 3 and 7 (question 2 and 3 p &lt; 0.0001, question 7 p = 0.0015). According to the analysis of individual IPSS questions, the greatest improvements were observed in frequency, nocturia and the feeling of incomplete bladder emptying.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest that a structured app-based therapeutic may exert a stronger effect on storage symptoms than voiding symptoms in men with LUTS. This study confirms the value of the digital therapy as an integral part of the standard care for patients with male LUTS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential impact of digital therapy on storage and voiding LUTS: A post-hoc IPSS analysis from the BEST randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Schönburg,&nbsp;Christian Gratzke,&nbsp;Kurt Miller,&nbsp;Erik Krieger,&nbsp;Patrick Papp,&nbsp;Laura Wiemer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate whether storage or voiding symptoms respond more favourably to the use of Kranus Lutera, the first app-based digital therapeutic for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), using detailed item-level analysis of the IPSS questionnaire.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The present data represent a post-hoc analysis of the results of the BEST trial, a randomized controlled study evaluating the efficiency of the digital therapy Kranus Lutera. The study period lasted 12 weeks, conducted between 04/2023 and 11/2023. We assessed the mean change from baseline to 12 weeks for each of the seven IPSS items. Voiding symptoms (items 1, 3, 5 and 6) and storage symptoms (items 2, 4 and 7) were analysed separately.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants using the digital therapeutic demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all IPSS items. Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed a significant and clinically relevant improvement in the primary endpoint (IPSS), with an overall reduction of −7.0 points (95% CI: −8.1 to −5.9, p &lt; 0.0001). Notably, improvements in storage symptoms were consistently larger than those in voiding symptoms. The analysis of individual IPSS questions showed the greatest changes in the overall cohort for questions 1, 2 and 7 (each p &lt; 0.0001). Patients with the single diagnosis BPH (N40) showed the greatest score reduction in questions 2 and 5 (each p &lt; 0.0001), patients with OAB (N32.8) in questions 2, 4 and 7 (each p &lt; 0.0001) and patients with BPH and OAB (N40 + N32.8) in questions 2, 3 and 7 (question 2 and 3 p &lt; 0.0001, question 7 p = 0.0015). According to the analysis of individual IPSS questions, the greatest improvements were observed in frequency, nocturia and the feeling of incomplete bladder emptying.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings suggest that a structured app-based therapeutic may exert a stronger effect on storage symptoms than voiding symptoms in men with LUTS. This study confirms the value of the digital therapy as an integral part of the standard care for patients with male LUTS.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70069\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过对IPSS问卷的详细项目水平分析,探讨首个基于应用程序的男性下尿路症状(LUTS)数字治疗药物Kranus Lutera对储存或排尿症状的反应是否更有利。材料和方法目前的数据是对BEST试验结果的事后分析,这是一项评估数字治疗Kranus Lutera效率的随机对照研究。研究时间为12周,于2023年4月至2023年11月进行。我们评估了七个IPSS项目中每一个项目从基线到12周的平均变化。分别分析排尿症状(第1、3、5和6项)和积液症状(第2、4和7项)。结果使用数字治疗的参与者在所有IPSS项目上表现出统计学上显著的改善。与对照组相比,干预组在主要终点(IPSS)方面表现出显著的临床相关改善,总体降低了- 7.0点(95% CI: - 8.1至- 5.9,p < 0.0001)。值得注意的是,储存症状的改善始终大于排尿症状的改善。对单个IPSS问题的分析显示,问题1、2和7在整个队列中变化最大(p < 0.0001)。单一诊断的BPH患者(N40)在问题2和5中得分下降最大(p < 0.0001),问题2、4和7中有OAB患者(N32.8) (p < 0.0001),问题2、3和7中有BPH和OAB患者(N40 + N32.8)(问题2和3 p <; 0.0001,问题7 p = 0.0015)。根据对个别IPSS问题的分析,最大的改善是在尿频、夜尿和膀胱排空不完全的感觉上。结论基于应用程序的结构化治疗可能对LUTS患者的储存症状比排尿症状有更强的作用。本研究证实了数字治疗作为男性LUTS患者标准护理的一个组成部分的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Differential impact of digital therapy on storage and voiding LUTS: A post-hoc IPSS analysis from the BEST randomized controlled trial

Differential impact of digital therapy on storage and voiding LUTS: A post-hoc IPSS analysis from the BEST randomized controlled trial

Objective

To investigate whether storage or voiding symptoms respond more favourably to the use of Kranus Lutera, the first app-based digital therapeutic for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), using detailed item-level analysis of the IPSS questionnaire.

Materials and Methods

The present data represent a post-hoc analysis of the results of the BEST trial, a randomized controlled study evaluating the efficiency of the digital therapy Kranus Lutera. The study period lasted 12 weeks, conducted between 04/2023 and 11/2023. We assessed the mean change from baseline to 12 weeks for each of the seven IPSS items. Voiding symptoms (items 1, 3, 5 and 6) and storage symptoms (items 2, 4 and 7) were analysed separately.

Results

Participants using the digital therapeutic demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all IPSS items. Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed a significant and clinically relevant improvement in the primary endpoint (IPSS), with an overall reduction of −7.0 points (95% CI: −8.1 to −5.9, p < 0.0001). Notably, improvements in storage symptoms were consistently larger than those in voiding symptoms. The analysis of individual IPSS questions showed the greatest changes in the overall cohort for questions 1, 2 and 7 (each p < 0.0001). Patients with the single diagnosis BPH (N40) showed the greatest score reduction in questions 2 and 5 (each p < 0.0001), patients with OAB (N32.8) in questions 2, 4 and 7 (each p < 0.0001) and patients with BPH and OAB (N40 + N32.8) in questions 2, 3 and 7 (question 2 and 3 p < 0.0001, question 7 p = 0.0015). According to the analysis of individual IPSS questions, the greatest improvements were observed in frequency, nocturia and the feeling of incomplete bladder emptying.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that a structured app-based therapeutic may exert a stronger effect on storage symptoms than voiding symptoms in men with LUTS. This study confirms the value of the digital therapy as an integral part of the standard care for patients with male LUTS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信