危重病人血氧饱和度暴露的时间维度和临床结果:一项回顾性多数据库队列研究

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Xiao-Yan Ding, Hai-Ping Xu, Jing-Ru Zhang, Han Chen
{"title":"危重病人血氧饱和度暴露的时间维度和临床结果:一项回顾性多数据库队列研究","authors":"Xiao-Yan Ding, Hai-Ping Xu, Jing-Ru Zhang, Han Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05652-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most studies on SpO2 exposure patterns focus solely on SpO2 intensity and neglect exposure duration. We systematically investigated the associations between SpO2 exposure patterns and clinical outcomes from both intensity and temporal dimensions in critically ill patients. In this retrospective cohort study, 121,758 critically ill patients were analyzed. The patient data were obtained from three databases: SICdb (n = 11,324) for continuous exposure analysis using heatmaps, MIMIC-IV (n = 50,110) for cumulative exposure analysis, and eICU (n = 60,324) for validation. We examined the relationships between SpO2 exposure and 28-day mortality using Cox regression and logistic regression models. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed using time-weighted SpO2 as a continuous variable to examine the continuous association between SpO2 values and mortality risk. Both analytical approaches revealed a U-shaped relationship between SpO2 and mortality. Heatmap analysis revealed a SpO2 of 93.5–97% as optimal, whereas Cox regression showed that a SpO2 of 96–97% conferred the strongest protection (HR 0.714, 95% CI 0.694–0.733; P < 0.001). Prolonged exposure to SpO2 > 98% had a diminishing effect, whereas SpO2 < 93.5% increased mortality risk (HR 1.236, P < 0.001). External validation confirmed these findings (AUC 0.813). Our study confirms a U-shaped relationship between SpO2 and outcomes, emphasizing that oxygenation assessments should consider both intensity and duration. A prolonged SpO2 above 98% or below 94% should be avoided in critically ill patients.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal dimensions of oxygen saturation exposure and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a retrospective multi-database cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Yan Ding, Hai-Ping Xu, Jing-Ru Zhang, Han Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-025-05652-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most studies on SpO2 exposure patterns focus solely on SpO2 intensity and neglect exposure duration. We systematically investigated the associations between SpO2 exposure patterns and clinical outcomes from both intensity and temporal dimensions in critically ill patients. In this retrospective cohort study, 121,758 critically ill patients were analyzed. The patient data were obtained from three databases: SICdb (n = 11,324) for continuous exposure analysis using heatmaps, MIMIC-IV (n = 50,110) for cumulative exposure analysis, and eICU (n = 60,324) for validation. We examined the relationships between SpO2 exposure and 28-day mortality using Cox regression and logistic regression models. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed using time-weighted SpO2 as a continuous variable to examine the continuous association between SpO2 values and mortality risk. Both analytical approaches revealed a U-shaped relationship between SpO2 and mortality. Heatmap analysis revealed a SpO2 of 93.5–97% as optimal, whereas Cox regression showed that a SpO2 of 96–97% conferred the strongest protection (HR 0.714, 95% CI 0.694–0.733; P < 0.001). Prolonged exposure to SpO2 > 98% had a diminishing effect, whereas SpO2 < 93.5% increased mortality risk (HR 1.236, P < 0.001). External validation confirmed these findings (AUC 0.813). Our study confirms a U-shaped relationship between SpO2 and outcomes, emphasizing that oxygenation assessments should consider both intensity and duration. A prolonged SpO2 above 98% or below 94% should be avoided in critically ill patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05652-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05652-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数关于SpO2暴露模式的研究只关注SpO2的强度,而忽视了暴露时间。我们系统地调查了危重患者SpO2暴露模式与临床结果之间的关系,包括强度和时间维度。在这项回顾性队列研究中,分析了121758例危重患者。患者数据来自三个数据库:SICdb (n = 11,324)用于使用热图进行持续暴露分析,MIMIC-IV (n = 50,110)用于累积暴露分析,eICU (n = 60,324)用于验证。我们使用Cox回归和logistic回归模型检验了SpO2暴露与28天死亡率之间的关系。使用时间加权SpO2作为连续变量进行限制性三次样条分析,以检验SpO2值与死亡风险之间的连续关联。两种分析方法都揭示了SpO2与死亡率之间的u型关系。热图分析显示,SpO2为93.5-97%为最佳,而Cox回归显示,SpO2为96-97%具有最强的保护作用(HR 0.714, 95% CI 0.694-0.733; P 98%具有递减效应,而SpO2 < 93.5%会增加死亡风险(HR 1.236, P < 0.001)。外部验证证实了这些发现(AUC 0.813)。我们的研究证实了SpO2与结果之间的u型关系,强调氧合评估应考虑强度和持续时间。危重患者应避免SpO2高于98%或低于94%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal dimensions of oxygen saturation exposure and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a retrospective multi-database cohort study
Most studies on SpO2 exposure patterns focus solely on SpO2 intensity and neglect exposure duration. We systematically investigated the associations between SpO2 exposure patterns and clinical outcomes from both intensity and temporal dimensions in critically ill patients. In this retrospective cohort study, 121,758 critically ill patients were analyzed. The patient data were obtained from three databases: SICdb (n = 11,324) for continuous exposure analysis using heatmaps, MIMIC-IV (n = 50,110) for cumulative exposure analysis, and eICU (n = 60,324) for validation. We examined the relationships between SpO2 exposure and 28-day mortality using Cox regression and logistic regression models. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed using time-weighted SpO2 as a continuous variable to examine the continuous association between SpO2 values and mortality risk. Both analytical approaches revealed a U-shaped relationship between SpO2 and mortality. Heatmap analysis revealed a SpO2 of 93.5–97% as optimal, whereas Cox regression showed that a SpO2 of 96–97% conferred the strongest protection (HR 0.714, 95% CI 0.694–0.733; P < 0.001). Prolonged exposure to SpO2 > 98% had a diminishing effect, whereas SpO2 < 93.5% increased mortality risk (HR 1.236, P < 0.001). External validation confirmed these findings (AUC 0.813). Our study confirms a U-shaped relationship between SpO2 and outcomes, emphasizing that oxygenation assessments should consider both intensity and duration. A prolonged SpO2 above 98% or below 94% should be avoided in critically ill patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信