评估药物蛋白-蛋白界面的配体对接方法:来自AlphaFold2和分子动力学改进的见解

IF 5.7 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jordi Gómez Borrego, Marc Torrent Burgas
{"title":"评估药物蛋白-蛋白界面的配体对接方法:来自AlphaFold2和分子动力学改进的见解","authors":"Jordi Gómez Borrego,&nbsp;Marc Torrent Burgas","doi":"10.1186/s13321-025-01067-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Advances in docking protocols have significantly enhanced the field of protein–protein interaction (PPI) modulation, with AlphaFold2 (AF2) and molecular dynamics (MD) refinements playing pivotal roles. This study evaluates the performance of AF2 models against experimentally solved structures in docking protocols targeting PPIs. Using a dataset of 16 interactions with validated modulators, we benchmarked eight docking protocols, revealing similar performance between native and AF2 models. Local docking strategies outperformed blind docking, with TankBind_local and Glide providing the best results across the structural types tested. MD simulations and other ensemble generation algorithms such as AlphaFlow, refined both native and AF2 models, improving docking outcomes but showing significant variability across conformations. These results suggest that, while structural refinement can enhance docking in some cases, overall performance appears to be constrained by limitations in scoring functions and docking methodologies. Although protein ensembles can improve virtual screening, predicting the most effective conformations for docking remains a challenge. These findings support the use of AF2-generated structures in docking protocols targeting PPIs and highlight the need to improve current scoring methodologies.</p><p>This study provides a systematic benchmark of docking protocols applied to protein–proteininteractions (PPIs) using both experimentally solved structures and AlphaFold2 models. Byintegrating molecular dynamics ensembles and AlphaFlow-generated conformations, we showthat structural refinement improves docking outcomes in selected cases, but overallperformance remains constrained by docking scoring function limitations. Our analysis showsthat AlphaFold2 models perform comparably to native structures in PPI docking, validating theiruse when experimental data are unavailable. These results establish a reference framework forfuture PPI-focused virtual screening and underscore the need for improved scoring functionsand ensemble-based approaches to better exploit emerging structural prediction tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cheminformatics","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13321-025-01067-4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating ligand docking methods for drugging protein–protein interfaces: insights from AlphaFold2 and molecular dynamics refinement\",\"authors\":\"Jordi Gómez Borrego,&nbsp;Marc Torrent Burgas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13321-025-01067-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Advances in docking protocols have significantly enhanced the field of protein–protein interaction (PPI) modulation, with AlphaFold2 (AF2) and molecular dynamics (MD) refinements playing pivotal roles. This study evaluates the performance of AF2 models against experimentally solved structures in docking protocols targeting PPIs. Using a dataset of 16 interactions with validated modulators, we benchmarked eight docking protocols, revealing similar performance between native and AF2 models. Local docking strategies outperformed blind docking, with TankBind_local and Glide providing the best results across the structural types tested. MD simulations and other ensemble generation algorithms such as AlphaFlow, refined both native and AF2 models, improving docking outcomes but showing significant variability across conformations. These results suggest that, while structural refinement can enhance docking in some cases, overall performance appears to be constrained by limitations in scoring functions and docking methodologies. Although protein ensembles can improve virtual screening, predicting the most effective conformations for docking remains a challenge. These findings support the use of AF2-generated structures in docking protocols targeting PPIs and highlight the need to improve current scoring methodologies.</p><p>This study provides a systematic benchmark of docking protocols applied to protein–proteininteractions (PPIs) using both experimentally solved structures and AlphaFold2 models. Byintegrating molecular dynamics ensembles and AlphaFlow-generated conformations, we showthat structural refinement improves docking outcomes in selected cases, but overallperformance remains constrained by docking scoring function limitations. Our analysis showsthat AlphaFold2 models perform comparably to native structures in PPI docking, validating theiruse when experimental data are unavailable. These results establish a reference framework forfuture PPI-focused virtual screening and underscore the need for improved scoring functionsand ensemble-based approaches to better exploit emerging structural prediction tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cheminformatics\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13321-025-01067-4\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cheminformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13321-025-01067-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cheminformatics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13321-025-01067-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对接协议的进展显著增强了蛋白-蛋白相互作用(PPI)调节领域,其中AlphaFold2 (AF2)和分子动力学(MD)的改进发挥了关键作用。本研究针对针对PPIs的对接协议中实验解决的结构,评估了AF2模型的性能。使用包含16个经过验证的调制器交互的数据集,我们对8个对接协议进行了基准测试,发现本地模型和AF2模型之间的性能相似。局部对接策略优于盲对接策略,TankBind_local和Glide在测试的结构类型中提供了最好的结果。MD模拟和其他集成生成算法(如AlphaFlow)改进了原生模型和AF2模型,改善了对接结果,但显示出不同构象之间的显著差异。这些结果表明,虽然结构优化在某些情况下可以增强对接,但总体性能似乎受到评分函数和对接方法的限制。尽管蛋白质集合可以改善虚拟筛选,但预测最有效的对接构象仍然是一个挑战。这些发现支持在针对PPIs的对接协议中使用af2生成的结构,并强调了改进当前评分方法的必要性。该研究通过实验解决的结构和AlphaFold2模型,为蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPIs)的对接协议提供了系统的基准。通过整合分子动力学集成和alphaflow生成的构象,我们发现结构优化在某些情况下改善了对接结果,但总体性能仍然受到对接评分函数的限制。我们的分析表明,AlphaFold2模型在PPI对接中的表现与原生结构相当,验证了它们在实验数据不可用时的使用。这些结果为未来以ppi为重点的虚拟筛选建立了参考框架,并强调了改进评分功能和基于集成的方法以更好地利用新兴结构预测工具的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating ligand docking methods for drugging protein–protein interfaces: insights from AlphaFold2 and molecular dynamics refinement

Advances in docking protocols have significantly enhanced the field of protein–protein interaction (PPI) modulation, with AlphaFold2 (AF2) and molecular dynamics (MD) refinements playing pivotal roles. This study evaluates the performance of AF2 models against experimentally solved structures in docking protocols targeting PPIs. Using a dataset of 16 interactions with validated modulators, we benchmarked eight docking protocols, revealing similar performance between native and AF2 models. Local docking strategies outperformed blind docking, with TankBind_local and Glide providing the best results across the structural types tested. MD simulations and other ensemble generation algorithms such as AlphaFlow, refined both native and AF2 models, improving docking outcomes but showing significant variability across conformations. These results suggest that, while structural refinement can enhance docking in some cases, overall performance appears to be constrained by limitations in scoring functions and docking methodologies. Although protein ensembles can improve virtual screening, predicting the most effective conformations for docking remains a challenge. These findings support the use of AF2-generated structures in docking protocols targeting PPIs and highlight the need to improve current scoring methodologies.

This study provides a systematic benchmark of docking protocols applied to protein–proteininteractions (PPIs) using both experimentally solved structures and AlphaFold2 models. Byintegrating molecular dynamics ensembles and AlphaFlow-generated conformations, we showthat structural refinement improves docking outcomes in selected cases, but overallperformance remains constrained by docking scoring function limitations. Our analysis showsthat AlphaFold2 models perform comparably to native structures in PPI docking, validating theiruse when experimental data are unavailable. These results establish a reference framework forfuture PPI-focused virtual screening and underscore the need for improved scoring functionsand ensemble-based approaches to better exploit emerging structural prediction tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cheminformatics
Journal of Cheminformatics CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cheminformatics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all aspects of cheminformatics and molecular modelling. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: chemical information systems, software and databases, and molecular modelling, chemical structure representations and their use in structure, substructure, and similarity searching of chemical substance and chemical reaction databases, computer and molecular graphics, computer-aided molecular design, expert systems, QSAR, and data mining techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信