从血清中消耗高丰蛋白的成本效益平台的跨物种蛋白质组学评估。

BMC methods Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-22 DOI:10.1186/s44330-025-00042-7
Zongkai Peng, Shakya Wije Munige, Deepti Bhusal, Isabella L Yang, Zhibo Yang, Nagib Ahsan
{"title":"从血清中消耗高丰蛋白的成本效益平台的跨物种蛋白质组学评估。","authors":"Zongkai Peng, Shakya Wije Munige, Deepti Bhusal, Isabella L Yang, Zhibo Yang, Nagib Ahsan","doi":"10.1186/s44330-025-00042-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood proteome analysis is becoming increasingly popular in veterinary research because many animal models have been used to study a range of human diseases. Most of the commercial high-abundance protein (HAP) depletion kits are optimized for human serum, whereas proteins in animal serum may not be present in human serum or may be present at different abundances. There are no previous studies investigating the efficacy of using various HAP kits for proteome analysis of animal serums.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used three commercial serum abundant protein depletion (SAPD) kits (i.e., ion exchange-based Norgen kit (ProteoSpin™), antibody-based Thermo Albumin Depletion Kit (Pierce™), solubility-based kit (Minute™), and a cost-effective method (i.e., perchloric acid (PerCA) HAP precipitation) to assess their effectiveness to process serums from five different species (i.e., mouse, chicken, dog, goat, and guinea pig). Protocols of the commercial kits were adopted from manufacturers' guidelines with minor modifications for optimized performance. Following HAP depletion, proteins from all species were digested using a Trypsin/Lys-C enzyme mix, desalted, and subjected to label-free quantitative bottom-up proteomics analysis via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The raw data were processed using the Andromeda search engine integrated into MaxQuant, and peptide identification was performed by searching against the UniProt-reviewed protein database. Advanced bioinformatics tools were employed to facilitate data analysis and visualization, ensuring comprehensive interpretation of the depletion efficiency and comparative performance of the methods across species.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We determined their capabilities of protein identification (Norgen kit > Minute kit > PerCA precipitation > Thermo kit), depletion efficiencies of HAPs (Minute kit > Norgen kit > PerCA precipitation > Thermo kit), and cost-effectiveness (PerCA precipitation > Minute kit > Norgen kit > Thermo kit). Our results show that the PerCA precipitation method, which is > 20 times cheaper than commercial kits, outperforms other methods in depleting HAPs, especially in mouse serum. While Norgen kit excels in mouse and goat serum, the PerCA precipitation method offers broader applicability and reveals unique low abundant proteins. Protein pathway analysis highlights distinct biological processes affected by different depletion methods.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overall, our studies provide valuable insights into protein depletion techniques, with the PerCA depletion method emerging as a cost-effective and versatile option for proteomics research across various serums.</p>","PeriodicalId":519945,"journal":{"name":"BMC methods","volume":"2 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross-species proteomic assessment of cost-effective platforms for depleting high-abundant proteins from blood serum.\",\"authors\":\"Zongkai Peng, Shakya Wije Munige, Deepti Bhusal, Isabella L Yang, Zhibo Yang, Nagib Ahsan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44330-025-00042-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood proteome analysis is becoming increasingly popular in veterinary research because many animal models have been used to study a range of human diseases. Most of the commercial high-abundance protein (HAP) depletion kits are optimized for human serum, whereas proteins in animal serum may not be present in human serum or may be present at different abundances. There are no previous studies investigating the efficacy of using various HAP kits for proteome analysis of animal serums.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used three commercial serum abundant protein depletion (SAPD) kits (i.e., ion exchange-based Norgen kit (ProteoSpin™), antibody-based Thermo Albumin Depletion Kit (Pierce™), solubility-based kit (Minute™), and a cost-effective method (i.e., perchloric acid (PerCA) HAP precipitation) to assess their effectiveness to process serums from five different species (i.e., mouse, chicken, dog, goat, and guinea pig). Protocols of the commercial kits were adopted from manufacturers' guidelines with minor modifications for optimized performance. Following HAP depletion, proteins from all species were digested using a Trypsin/Lys-C enzyme mix, desalted, and subjected to label-free quantitative bottom-up proteomics analysis via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The raw data were processed using the Andromeda search engine integrated into MaxQuant, and peptide identification was performed by searching against the UniProt-reviewed protein database. Advanced bioinformatics tools were employed to facilitate data analysis and visualization, ensuring comprehensive interpretation of the depletion efficiency and comparative performance of the methods across species.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We determined their capabilities of protein identification (Norgen kit > Minute kit > PerCA precipitation > Thermo kit), depletion efficiencies of HAPs (Minute kit > Norgen kit > PerCA precipitation > Thermo kit), and cost-effectiveness (PerCA precipitation > Minute kit > Norgen kit > Thermo kit). Our results show that the PerCA precipitation method, which is > 20 times cheaper than commercial kits, outperforms other methods in depleting HAPs, especially in mouse serum. While Norgen kit excels in mouse and goat serum, the PerCA precipitation method offers broader applicability and reveals unique low abundant proteins. Protein pathway analysis highlights distinct biological processes affected by different depletion methods.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overall, our studies provide valuable insights into protein depletion techniques, with the PerCA depletion method emerging as a cost-effective and versatile option for proteomics research across various serums.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC methods\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450807/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44330-025-00042-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44330-025-00042-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血液蛋白质组分析在兽医研究中越来越流行,因为许多动物模型已被用于研究一系列人类疾病。大多数商用高丰度蛋白(HAP)耗尽试剂盒对人血清进行了优化,而动物血清中的蛋白质可能不存在于人血清中,或者可能以不同的丰度存在。使用各种HAP试剂盒对动物血清进行蛋白质组分析的有效性,目前尚无相关研究。方法:我们使用三种商用血清丰富蛋白耗尽(SAPD)试剂盒(即基于离子交换的Norgen试剂盒(ProteoSpin™),基于抗体的Thermo Albumin depletion kit (Pierce™),基于溶解性的试剂盒(Minute™)和一种具有成本效益的方法(即高氯酸(PerCA) HAP沉淀法)来评估它们处理五种不同物种(即小鼠,鸡,狗,山羊和豚鼠)血清的有效性。商业试剂盒的方案采用了制造商的指导方针,并进行了微小的修改以优化性能。在HAP耗尽后,所有物种的蛋白质使用Trypsin/Lys-C酶混合物消化,脱盐,并通过液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)进行无标记的自下而上定量蛋白质组学分析。原始数据使用集成在MaxQuant中的Andromeda搜索引擎进行处理,并通过在uniprot审查的蛋白数据库中搜索进行肽鉴定。采用先进的生物信息学工具促进数据分析和可视化,确保全面解释耗尽效率和跨物种比较性能的方法。结果:我们确定了它们的蛋白质鉴定能力(Norgen kit > Minute kit > PerCA precipitation > Thermo kit)、HAPs的消耗效率(Minute kit > Norgen kit > PerCA precipitation > Thermo kit)和成本效益(PerCA precipitation > Minute kit > Norgen kit > Thermo kit)。我们的研究结果表明,PerCA沉淀法比商业试剂盒便宜20倍,在消耗HAPs方面优于其他方法,特别是在小鼠血清中。虽然Norgen试剂盒在小鼠和山羊血清中表现出色,但PerCA沉淀法具有更广泛的适用性,并能揭示独特的低丰度蛋白质。蛋白质通路分析强调了受不同消耗方法影响的不同生物过程。讨论:总的来说,我们的研究为蛋白质耗尽技术提供了有价值的见解,随着PerCA耗尽方法成为跨各种血清蛋白质组学研究的成本效益和多功能选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A cross-species proteomic assessment of cost-effective platforms for depleting high-abundant proteins from blood serum.

A cross-species proteomic assessment of cost-effective platforms for depleting high-abundant proteins from blood serum.

A cross-species proteomic assessment of cost-effective platforms for depleting high-abundant proteins from blood serum.

A cross-species proteomic assessment of cost-effective platforms for depleting high-abundant proteins from blood serum.

Background: Blood proteome analysis is becoming increasingly popular in veterinary research because many animal models have been used to study a range of human diseases. Most of the commercial high-abundance protein (HAP) depletion kits are optimized for human serum, whereas proteins in animal serum may not be present in human serum or may be present at different abundances. There are no previous studies investigating the efficacy of using various HAP kits for proteome analysis of animal serums.

Method: We used three commercial serum abundant protein depletion (SAPD) kits (i.e., ion exchange-based Norgen kit (ProteoSpin™), antibody-based Thermo Albumin Depletion Kit (Pierce™), solubility-based kit (Minute™), and a cost-effective method (i.e., perchloric acid (PerCA) HAP precipitation) to assess their effectiveness to process serums from five different species (i.e., mouse, chicken, dog, goat, and guinea pig). Protocols of the commercial kits were adopted from manufacturers' guidelines with minor modifications for optimized performance. Following HAP depletion, proteins from all species were digested using a Trypsin/Lys-C enzyme mix, desalted, and subjected to label-free quantitative bottom-up proteomics analysis via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The raw data were processed using the Andromeda search engine integrated into MaxQuant, and peptide identification was performed by searching against the UniProt-reviewed protein database. Advanced bioinformatics tools were employed to facilitate data analysis and visualization, ensuring comprehensive interpretation of the depletion efficiency and comparative performance of the methods across species.

Result: We determined their capabilities of protein identification (Norgen kit > Minute kit > PerCA precipitation > Thermo kit), depletion efficiencies of HAPs (Minute kit > Norgen kit > PerCA precipitation > Thermo kit), and cost-effectiveness (PerCA precipitation > Minute kit > Norgen kit > Thermo kit). Our results show that the PerCA precipitation method, which is > 20 times cheaper than commercial kits, outperforms other methods in depleting HAPs, especially in mouse serum. While Norgen kit excels in mouse and goat serum, the PerCA precipitation method offers broader applicability and reveals unique low abundant proteins. Protein pathway analysis highlights distinct biological processes affected by different depletion methods.

Discussion: Overall, our studies provide valuable insights into protein depletion techniques, with the PerCA depletion method emerging as a cost-effective and versatile option for proteomics research across various serums.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信