重症监护后16个月的生活质量和残疾:COVID-19和非COVID-19幸存者的比较

Liliana Cristina da Silva Ferreira Fontes, Bárbara Peleteiro, Paulo Jorge Ribeiro Costa, Joana Carolina João Fernandes, Tatiana Santos Vieira, António José Falcão Braga, Sónia Patrícia Vilar Martins, Ana Rita Leal Ferreira, Isabel Maria Metelo Coimbra, Lia Paula Nogueira Sousa Fernandes, José Artur Osório de Carvalho Paiva
{"title":"重症监护后16个月的生活质量和残疾:COVID-19和非COVID-19幸存者的比较","authors":"Liliana Cristina da Silva Ferreira Fontes, Bárbara Peleteiro, Paulo Jorge Ribeiro Costa, Joana Carolina João Fernandes, Tatiana Santos Vieira, António José Falcão Braga, Sónia Patrícia Vilar Martins, Ana Rita Leal Ferreira, Isabel Maria Metelo Coimbra, Lia Paula Nogueira Sousa Fernandes, José Artur Osório de Carvalho Paiva","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe and compare the Quality of Life (QoL) and disability of critical care survivors with COVID-19 and NON-COVID-19 critical illness, admitted during and after the pandemic period. We hypothesize that both COVID-19 disease and the pandemic context have a significant impact on long-term outcomes of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) survivors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Intensive Care Department of Unidade Local de Saúde São João between 1st October 2020 and 31st December 2021.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Three groups of adult critical care survivors; Group 1: critical COVID-19 patients; Group 2: critical patients with other diagnosis, admitted in the pandemic period; Group 3: critical patients admitted in the post-pandemic period due to non-COVID-19 causes.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Telephone consultation 16 months after discharge home, assessing QoL and disability.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>QoL five dimensions, EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) and Health and disability 6 domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 185 survivors, Group 1 reported less problems in\"Self-care\" (OR = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.04-0.55), \"Usual activities\" (OR = 0.20, 95%CI: 0.08-0.0.52), and \"Anxiety/Depression\" (OR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.14-0.97) dimensions. Health and disability domains assessment showed Group 1 had less difficulties in \"Cognition\" (OR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.15-0.91), \"Mobility\" (OR = 0.25, 95%CI: 0.09-0.68), \"Self-care\" (OR = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.05-0.40) and \"Life activities\" (OR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.13-0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sixteen months after discharge home, survivors of non-COVID-19 admitted during the pandemic period present worse QoL and functional status than COVID-19 survivors admitted during the same period and greater post-hospital discharge healthcare needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":"502309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life and disability 16 months after critical care illness: Comparison between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 survivors.\",\"authors\":\"Liliana Cristina da Silva Ferreira Fontes, Bárbara Peleteiro, Paulo Jorge Ribeiro Costa, Joana Carolina João Fernandes, Tatiana Santos Vieira, António José Falcão Braga, Sónia Patrícia Vilar Martins, Ana Rita Leal Ferreira, Isabel Maria Metelo Coimbra, Lia Paula Nogueira Sousa Fernandes, José Artur Osório de Carvalho Paiva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe and compare the Quality of Life (QoL) and disability of critical care survivors with COVID-19 and NON-COVID-19 critical illness, admitted during and after the pandemic period. We hypothesize that both COVID-19 disease and the pandemic context have a significant impact on long-term outcomes of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) survivors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Intensive Care Department of Unidade Local de Saúde São João between 1st October 2020 and 31st December 2021.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Three groups of adult critical care survivors; Group 1: critical COVID-19 patients; Group 2: critical patients with other diagnosis, admitted in the pandemic period; Group 3: critical patients admitted in the post-pandemic period due to non-COVID-19 causes.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Telephone consultation 16 months after discharge home, assessing QoL and disability.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>QoL five dimensions, EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) and Health and disability 6 domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 185 survivors, Group 1 reported less problems in\\\"Self-care\\\" (OR = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.04-0.55), \\\"Usual activities\\\" (OR = 0.20, 95%CI: 0.08-0.0.52), and \\\"Anxiety/Depression\\\" (OR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.14-0.97) dimensions. Health and disability domains assessment showed Group 1 had less difficulties in \\\"Cognition\\\" (OR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.15-0.91), \\\"Mobility\\\" (OR = 0.25, 95%CI: 0.09-0.68), \\\"Self-care\\\" (OR = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.05-0.40) and \\\"Life activities\\\" (OR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.13-0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sixteen months after discharge home, survivors of non-COVID-19 admitted during the pandemic period present worse QoL and functional status than COVID-19 survivors admitted during the same period and greater post-hospital discharge healthcare needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"502309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述并比较大流行期间和之后入院的COVID-19和非COVID-19危重症重症监护幸存者的生活质量(QoL)和残疾。我们假设COVID-19疾病和大流行背景对重症监护病房(ICU)幸存者的长期预后有重大影响。设计:前瞻性收集数据的事后分析。地点:2020年10月1日至2021年12月31日期间,奥约大学当地医院Saúde的重症监护室。参与者:三组成人重症监护幸存者;第一组:COVID-19危重患者;第二组:大流行期间入院的其他诊断的危重患者;第三组:大流行后因非covid -19原因入院的危重患者。干预措施:出院16个月后电话咨询,评估生活质量和残疾情况。主要感兴趣的变量:生活质量5个维度,欧洲生活质量视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)和健康和残疾6个领域。结果:在185名幸存者中,第一组报告的“自我照顾”(OR = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.04-0.55)、“日常活动”(OR = 0.20, 95%CI: 0.08-0.0.52)和“焦虑/抑郁”(OR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.14-0.97)维度的问题较少。健康和残疾领域评估显示,组1在“认知”(OR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.15-0.91)、“行动能力”(OR = 0.25, 95%CI: 0.09-0.68)、“自我照顾”(OR = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.05-0.40)和“生活活动”(OR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.13-0.76)方面的困难较小。结论:大流行期间入院的非COVID-19幸存者在出院16个月后的生活质量和功能状况较同期入院的COVID-19幸存者差,出院后医疗保健需求更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of life and disability 16 months after critical care illness: Comparison between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 survivors.

Objective: Describe and compare the Quality of Life (QoL) and disability of critical care survivors with COVID-19 and NON-COVID-19 critical illness, admitted during and after the pandemic period. We hypothesize that both COVID-19 disease and the pandemic context have a significant impact on long-term outcomes of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) survivors.

Design: Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data.

Setting: Intensive Care Department of Unidade Local de Saúde São João between 1st October 2020 and 31st December 2021.

Participants: Three groups of adult critical care survivors; Group 1: critical COVID-19 patients; Group 2: critical patients with other diagnosis, admitted in the pandemic period; Group 3: critical patients admitted in the post-pandemic period due to non-COVID-19 causes.

Intervention: Telephone consultation 16 months after discharge home, assessing QoL and disability.

Main variables of interest: QoL five dimensions, EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) and Health and disability 6 domains.

Results: Of the 185 survivors, Group 1 reported less problems in"Self-care" (OR = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.04-0.55), "Usual activities" (OR = 0.20, 95%CI: 0.08-0.0.52), and "Anxiety/Depression" (OR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.14-0.97) dimensions. Health and disability domains assessment showed Group 1 had less difficulties in "Cognition" (OR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.15-0.91), "Mobility" (OR = 0.25, 95%CI: 0.09-0.68), "Self-care" (OR = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.05-0.40) and "Life activities" (OR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.13-0.76).

Conclusions: Sixteen months after discharge home, survivors of non-COVID-19 admitted during the pandemic period present worse QoL and functional status than COVID-19 survivors admitted during the same period and greater post-hospital discharge healthcare needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信