{"title":"进行性塌陷足畸形的颈椎、弹簧和骨间距跟韧带定位的MRI评价。","authors":"Alexander Chang, Brady Huang, Ian Foran","doi":"10.1177/10711007251363927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a complex condition characterized by progressive ligamentous and osseous changes in the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. Although osseous changes at the subtalar and transverse tarsal joints have been well studied, ligamentous anatomy in PCFD is less understood. This study evaluates the cervical, interosseous talocalcaneal, and superomedial fibers of the spring ligament in patients with PCFD vs controls using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nonweightbearing MRI and weightbearing radiographs of 39 patients (23 PCFD, 16 controls) were retrospectively reviewed. MRIs measured the coronal plane orientation of the interosseous talocalcaneal, cervical, and superomedial spring ligaments relative to the subtalar joint middle facet. Radiographic data included anteroposterior (AP) talonavicular coverage percentage, AP talocalcaneal angle (Kite), lateral talar-first metatarsal angle (Meary), talar declination angle, and calcaneal pitch. Two observers measured each radiographic and MRI angle. Statistical analysis included an independent <i>t</i> test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess interobserver reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCFD patients demonstrated significantly more horizontal ligament orientations than controls, with reduced cervical (25.5 vs 45 degrees, <i>P</i> < .001), superomedial spring (11.5 vs 23.1 degrees, <i>P</i> < .001), and interosseous talocalcaneal ligament angles (39.5 vs 49.0 degrees, <i>P</i> = .005). Radiographically, PCFD patients had decreased talonavicular coverage (64.5% vs 80.9%, <i>P</i> < .001), increased Meary angle (22.2 vs -2.3 degrees, <i>P</i> < .001), increased talar declination (37.0 vs 20.6 degrees, <i>P</i> < .001), increased Kite angle (20.7 vs 17.2 degrees, <i>P</i> = .079), and decreased calcaneal pitch (15.5 vs 24.6 degrees, <i>P</i> < .001). Interobserver reliability was excellent, with ICC values exceeding 0.94 for all measurements except interosseous talocalcaneal ligament angle (ICC = 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On nonweightbearing MRI, PCFD patients showed more horizontal orientation of key subtalar ligaments than controls; whether these differences persist under physiologic load should be confirmed with weightbearing imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"10711007251363927"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI Evaluation of Cervical, Spring, and Interosseous Talocalcaneal Ligament Orientation in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Chang, Brady Huang, Ian Foran\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10711007251363927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a complex condition characterized by progressive ligamentous and osseous changes in the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. Although osseous changes at the subtalar and transverse tarsal joints have been well studied, ligamentous anatomy in PCFD is less understood. This study evaluates the cervical, interosseous talocalcaneal, and superomedial fibers of the spring ligament in patients with PCFD vs controls using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nonweightbearing MRI and weightbearing radiographs of 39 patients (23 PCFD, 16 controls) were retrospectively reviewed. MRIs measured the coronal plane orientation of the interosseous talocalcaneal, cervical, and superomedial spring ligaments relative to the subtalar joint middle facet. Radiographic data included anteroposterior (AP) talonavicular coverage percentage, AP talocalcaneal angle (Kite), lateral talar-first metatarsal angle (Meary), talar declination angle, and calcaneal pitch. Two observers measured each radiographic and MRI angle. Statistical analysis included an independent <i>t</i> test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess interobserver reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCFD patients demonstrated significantly more horizontal ligament orientations than controls, with reduced cervical (25.5 vs 45 degrees, <i>P</i> < .001), superomedial spring (11.5 vs 23.1 degrees, <i>P</i> < .001), and interosseous talocalcaneal ligament angles (39.5 vs 49.0 degrees, <i>P</i> = .005). Radiographically, PCFD patients had decreased talonavicular coverage (64.5% vs 80.9%, <i>P</i> < .001), increased Meary angle (22.2 vs -2.3 degrees, <i>P</i> < .001), increased talar declination (37.0 vs 20.6 degrees, <i>P</i> < .001), increased Kite angle (20.7 vs 17.2 degrees, <i>P</i> = .079), and decreased calcaneal pitch (15.5 vs 24.6 degrees, <i>P</i> < .001). Interobserver reliability was excellent, with ICC values exceeding 0.94 for all measurements except interosseous talocalcaneal ligament angle (ICC = 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On nonweightbearing MRI, PCFD patients showed more horizontal orientation of key subtalar ligaments than controls; whether these differences persist under physiologic load should be confirmed with weightbearing imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10711007251363927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251363927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251363927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:进行性塌陷足畸形(PCFD)是一种复杂的疾病,其特征是后足、中足和前足的韧带和骨骼发生进行性改变。虽然距下关节和跗骨横关节的骨性变化已经得到了很好的研究,但对PCFD的韧带解剖却知之甚少。本研究利用磁共振成像(MRI)分析了PCFD患者与对照组的颈椎、骨间距跟骨和弹簧韧带的上内侧纤维。方法:回顾性分析39例患者(PCFD 23例,对照组16例)的非负重MRI和负重x线片。mri测量距骨跟骨间、颈椎和上内侧弹簧韧带相对于距下关节中间小关节的冠状面方向。x线资料包括距舟骨前后位覆盖百分率、距跟角(Kite)、距第一跖外侧角(Meary)、距角倾角和跟骨距。两名观察员测量了每个x线和MRI角度。统计分析包括独立t检验和类内相关系数(ICC)来评估观察者间的信度。结果:PCFD患者的水平韧带取向明显高于对照组,颈椎复位(25.5度vs 45度,P P P = 0.005)。影像学上,PCFD患者距舟骨覆盖率下降(64.5% vs 80.9%, P P P P =。结论:在非负重MRI上,PCFD患者比对照组显示出更多的距下关键韧带水平取向,这些差异在生理负荷下是否持续,应通过负重成像来证实。
MRI Evaluation of Cervical, Spring, and Interosseous Talocalcaneal Ligament Orientation in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.
Background: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a complex condition characterized by progressive ligamentous and osseous changes in the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. Although osseous changes at the subtalar and transverse tarsal joints have been well studied, ligamentous anatomy in PCFD is less understood. This study evaluates the cervical, interosseous talocalcaneal, and superomedial fibers of the spring ligament in patients with PCFD vs controls using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis.
Methods: Nonweightbearing MRI and weightbearing radiographs of 39 patients (23 PCFD, 16 controls) were retrospectively reviewed. MRIs measured the coronal plane orientation of the interosseous talocalcaneal, cervical, and superomedial spring ligaments relative to the subtalar joint middle facet. Radiographic data included anteroposterior (AP) talonavicular coverage percentage, AP talocalcaneal angle (Kite), lateral talar-first metatarsal angle (Meary), talar declination angle, and calcaneal pitch. Two observers measured each radiographic and MRI angle. Statistical analysis included an independent t test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess interobserver reliability.
Results: PCFD patients demonstrated significantly more horizontal ligament orientations than controls, with reduced cervical (25.5 vs 45 degrees, P < .001), superomedial spring (11.5 vs 23.1 degrees, P < .001), and interosseous talocalcaneal ligament angles (39.5 vs 49.0 degrees, P = .005). Radiographically, PCFD patients had decreased talonavicular coverage (64.5% vs 80.9%, P < .001), increased Meary angle (22.2 vs -2.3 degrees, P < .001), increased talar declination (37.0 vs 20.6 degrees, P < .001), increased Kite angle (20.7 vs 17.2 degrees, P = .079), and decreased calcaneal pitch (15.5 vs 24.6 degrees, P < .001). Interobserver reliability was excellent, with ICC values exceeding 0.94 for all measurements except interosseous talocalcaneal ligament angle (ICC = 0.83).
Conclusion: On nonweightbearing MRI, PCFD patients showed more horizontal orientation of key subtalar ligaments than controls; whether these differences persist under physiologic load should be confirmed with weightbearing imaging.