利用人工智能模型在胚胎植入前基因检测中准确识别异常倍性。

IF 11.1 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human reproduction open Pub Date : 2025-09-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/hropen/hoaf054
Pingyuan Xie, Rijing Pang, Luyao Zeng, Shuoping Zhang, Lei Sun, Kaisen Yang, Xiaoyi Yang, Shuang Zhou, Senlin Zhang, Guangjian Liu, Yueqiu Tan, Liang Hu, Fei Gong, Jia Fei, Ge Lin
{"title":"利用人工智能模型在胚胎植入前基因检测中准确识别异常倍性。","authors":"Pingyuan Xie, Rijing Pang, Luyao Zeng, Shuoping Zhang, Lei Sun, Kaisen Yang, Xiaoyi Yang, Shuang Zhou, Senlin Zhang, Guangjian Liu, Yueqiu Tan, Liang Hu, Fei Gong, Jia Fei, Ge Lin","doi":"10.1093/hropen/hoaf054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>Can ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (ulc-WGS) accurately identify abnormal ploidy during preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>The artificial intelligence (AI)-based PGT-Plus model demonstrates high accuracy in ploidy detection, offering a cost-effective solution that enhances clinical utility of PGT.</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>The predominant PGT for aneuploidy can identify chromosomal aneuploidies but cannot determine ploidy status. Transferring embryos with ploidy abnormalities can result in miscarriage and molar pregnancy. On the other hand, in ART, fertilization is assessed by morphological pronuclear assessment at the zygote stage. However, it has a low specificity in the prediction of abnormal ploidy status and embryos deemed abnormally fertilized can yield healthy pregnancies. Accurately identified abnormal ploidy in PGT-A can resolve current limitations and expand the utility range of PGT-A. Several studies have identified ploidy abnormalities; however, they were mainly based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays or needed to combine additional targeted-next-generation sequencing (NGS) information. Studies based on ulc-WGS remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Study design size duration: </strong>The study consisted of two stages: methodology establishment and validation. An AI model, named PGT-Plus, was developed using 653 samples with known ploidy status, which was further validated using 792 different ploidy status samples. In the clinical application stage, the approach was used to analyse the ploidy status of 19 103 normally fertilized PGT blastocysts and 140 single pronucleus (1PN)-derived blastocysts collected between May 2022 and December 2023. All blastocysts were tested using trophectoderm biopsy and NGS.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials setting methods: </strong>The methodology is based on the ulc-WGS data. First, based on samples with known ploidy status: the heterozygosity rate of high-frequency biallelic SNPs, the likelihood ratio (LLR) of alleles was calculated under different assumptions ('both parental homologs' [BPH] from a single parent, 'single parental homolog' [SPH] from each parent, disomy, and monosomy) by leveraging allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium (LD) measured in the 1000 genomes project database. Twenty-three continuous candidate features derived from heterozygosity rates and LLRs of chromosomes or selected windows were included to establish the ploidy prediction AI model. Gini importance analysis and multicollinearity mitigation was performed for feature selection, then the performance of Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression for modelling was compared. Subsequently, the parameter optimization was performed based on the RF model. Ploidy constitution concordance was evaluated in known ploidy status samples. The frequency of abnormal ploidy in normal fertilized PGT blastocysts and 1PN-derived blastocysts (including conventional IVF and ICSI) was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>Eleven features were collected for model architecture compared to SVM and Logistic Regression; RF achieved superior performance for ploidy detection. The AI model achieved an AUC of 1 for genome-wide-uniparental diploidy (GW-UPD), 1 for triploidy, and 0.99 for diploidy. For the 792 validation samples, 99.5% of samples were successfully detected using the AI model, and the model showed 100% accuracy for ploidy classification. In the clinical application stage, out of 19 103 PGT samples, 19 069 were successfully analysed using the model, with 110 (0.57%) identified as having abnormal ploidy embryos. Among these, 12.7% (14/110) were identified as GW-UPD, and 87.3% (96/110) were triploid. Among 5563 diploid blastocysts transferred, 3478 clinical pregnancies were achieved. Subsequent ploidy analysis was performed for 217 spontaneous abortion and 935 prenatal diagnostic samples, and no abnormal ploidy was identified. Furthermore, of the 140 1PN embryos tested, 40 (28.6%) exhibited GW-UPD, 3 (2.1%) exhibited triploidy, and 97 (69.3%) were determined to be biparental and normally fertilized. Among the 97 biparental embryos, 46 were diploid, 11 were mosaic, and 40 were aneuploid. In terms of the insemination pattern, the percentage of abnormal ploidy in ICSI was significantly higher than in conventional IVF (<i>P</i> < 0.01, 37.1% vs. 2.9%, respectively). With full informed consent, 20 patients without euploidy from normal fertilization chose 1PN-derived biparental and diploid blastocysts to transfer, resulting in 10 clinical pregnancies and 9 ongoing pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Large-scale data: </strong>N/A.</p><p><strong>Limitations reasons for caution: </strong>Some rare ploidy abnormalities, such as polyploidy with an equal number of identical sets of chromosomes and ploidy mosaicism cannot be accurately identified. Moreover, the origin of abnormal ploidy was not identified due to the unavailability of DNA from both parents.</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>The PGT-Plus AI model provides a ploidy evaluation method based on the conventional PGT-A data and integrates directly into standard PGT-A workflows. Clinical utility results suggest that the model is a valuable tool for identifying embryos with abnormal ploidy in PGT-A and rescuing normal diploid embryos from abnormally fertilized embryos. These findings demonstrate that PGT-Plus significantly enhances the diagnostic accuracy of PGT.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interests: </strong>This study was supported by grants from Major Scientific Program of CITIC Group (No. 2023ZXKYB34100, to Ge.L.), Hunan Provincial Grant for Innovative Province Construction (2019SK4012), Hunan Xiangjiang New District (Changsha High-tech Zone) key core technology research project in 2023, and Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant 2023JJ30422). All authors declared no conflicts of interest..</p>","PeriodicalId":73264,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction open","volume":"2025 4","pages":"hoaf054"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accurate identification of abnormal ploidy using an artificial intelligence model in preimplantation genetic testing.\",\"authors\":\"Pingyuan Xie, Rijing Pang, Luyao Zeng, Shuoping Zhang, Lei Sun, Kaisen Yang, Xiaoyi Yang, Shuang Zhou, Senlin Zhang, Guangjian Liu, Yueqiu Tan, Liang Hu, Fei Gong, Jia Fei, Ge Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/hropen/hoaf054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>Can ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (ulc-WGS) accurately identify abnormal ploidy during preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>The artificial intelligence (AI)-based PGT-Plus model demonstrates high accuracy in ploidy detection, offering a cost-effective solution that enhances clinical utility of PGT.</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>The predominant PGT for aneuploidy can identify chromosomal aneuploidies but cannot determine ploidy status. Transferring embryos with ploidy abnormalities can result in miscarriage and molar pregnancy. On the other hand, in ART, fertilization is assessed by morphological pronuclear assessment at the zygote stage. However, it has a low specificity in the prediction of abnormal ploidy status and embryos deemed abnormally fertilized can yield healthy pregnancies. Accurately identified abnormal ploidy in PGT-A can resolve current limitations and expand the utility range of PGT-A. Several studies have identified ploidy abnormalities; however, they were mainly based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays or needed to combine additional targeted-next-generation sequencing (NGS) information. Studies based on ulc-WGS remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Study design size duration: </strong>The study consisted of two stages: methodology establishment and validation. An AI model, named PGT-Plus, was developed using 653 samples with known ploidy status, which was further validated using 792 different ploidy status samples. In the clinical application stage, the approach was used to analyse the ploidy status of 19 103 normally fertilized PGT blastocysts and 140 single pronucleus (1PN)-derived blastocysts collected between May 2022 and December 2023. All blastocysts were tested using trophectoderm biopsy and NGS.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials setting methods: </strong>The methodology is based on the ulc-WGS data. First, based on samples with known ploidy status: the heterozygosity rate of high-frequency biallelic SNPs, the likelihood ratio (LLR) of alleles was calculated under different assumptions ('both parental homologs' [BPH] from a single parent, 'single parental homolog' [SPH] from each parent, disomy, and monosomy) by leveraging allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium (LD) measured in the 1000 genomes project database. Twenty-three continuous candidate features derived from heterozygosity rates and LLRs of chromosomes or selected windows were included to establish the ploidy prediction AI model. Gini importance analysis and multicollinearity mitigation was performed for feature selection, then the performance of Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression for modelling was compared. Subsequently, the parameter optimization was performed based on the RF model. Ploidy constitution concordance was evaluated in known ploidy status samples. The frequency of abnormal ploidy in normal fertilized PGT blastocysts and 1PN-derived blastocysts (including conventional IVF and ICSI) was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>Eleven features were collected for model architecture compared to SVM and Logistic Regression; RF achieved superior performance for ploidy detection. The AI model achieved an AUC of 1 for genome-wide-uniparental diploidy (GW-UPD), 1 for triploidy, and 0.99 for diploidy. For the 792 validation samples, 99.5% of samples were successfully detected using the AI model, and the model showed 100% accuracy for ploidy classification. In the clinical application stage, out of 19 103 PGT samples, 19 069 were successfully analysed using the model, with 110 (0.57%) identified as having abnormal ploidy embryos. Among these, 12.7% (14/110) were identified as GW-UPD, and 87.3% (96/110) were triploid. Among 5563 diploid blastocysts transferred, 3478 clinical pregnancies were achieved. Subsequent ploidy analysis was performed for 217 spontaneous abortion and 935 prenatal diagnostic samples, and no abnormal ploidy was identified. Furthermore, of the 140 1PN embryos tested, 40 (28.6%) exhibited GW-UPD, 3 (2.1%) exhibited triploidy, and 97 (69.3%) were determined to be biparental and normally fertilized. Among the 97 biparental embryos, 46 were diploid, 11 were mosaic, and 40 were aneuploid. In terms of the insemination pattern, the percentage of abnormal ploidy in ICSI was significantly higher than in conventional IVF (<i>P</i> < 0.01, 37.1% vs. 2.9%, respectively). With full informed consent, 20 patients without euploidy from normal fertilization chose 1PN-derived biparental and diploid blastocysts to transfer, resulting in 10 clinical pregnancies and 9 ongoing pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Large-scale data: </strong>N/A.</p><p><strong>Limitations reasons for caution: </strong>Some rare ploidy abnormalities, such as polyploidy with an equal number of identical sets of chromosomes and ploidy mosaicism cannot be accurately identified. Moreover, the origin of abnormal ploidy was not identified due to the unavailability of DNA from both parents.</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>The PGT-Plus AI model provides a ploidy evaluation method based on the conventional PGT-A data and integrates directly into standard PGT-A workflows. Clinical utility results suggest that the model is a valuable tool for identifying embryos with abnormal ploidy in PGT-A and rescuing normal diploid embryos from abnormally fertilized embryos. These findings demonstrate that PGT-Plus significantly enhances the diagnostic accuracy of PGT.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interests: </strong>This study was supported by grants from Major Scientific Program of CITIC Group (No. 2023ZXKYB34100, to Ge.L.), Hunan Provincial Grant for Innovative Province Construction (2019SK4012), Hunan Xiangjiang New District (Changsha High-tech Zone) key core technology research project in 2023, and Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant 2023JJ30422). All authors declared no conflicts of interest..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human reproduction open\",\"volume\":\"2025 4\",\"pages\":\"hoaf054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453672/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human reproduction open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaf054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaf054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题:超低覆盖率全基因组测序(ulc-WGS)能否在胚胎植入前基因检测(PGT)中准确识别异常倍性?基于人工智能(AI)的PGT- plus模型在倍性检测方面具有很高的准确性,为提高PGT的临床应用提供了一种经济高效的解决方案。已知情况:非整倍体的主要PGT可以识别染色体非整倍体,但不能确定倍体状态。移植具有倍性异常的胚胎可导致流产和磨牙妊娠。另一方面,在抗逆转录病毒技术中,受精是通过合子阶段的形态原核评估来评估的。然而,它在预测异常倍性状态方面的特异性较低,被认为异常受精的胚胎可以产生健康的妊娠。准确识别PGT-A异常倍性可以解决目前PGT-A的局限性,扩大PGT-A的使用范围。一些研究已经发现了倍性异常;然而,它们主要基于单核苷酸多态性(SNP)阵列或需要结合额外的靶向下一代测序(NGS)信息。基于ulc-WGS的研究仍然很少。研究设计规模和持续时间:研究包括两个阶段:方法学建立和验证。利用已知倍性状态的653个样本建立了名为PGT-Plus的人工智能模型,并使用792个不同倍性状态的样本进一步验证了该模型。在临床应用阶段,该方法分析了2022年5月至2023年12月收集的19103个正常受精的PGT囊胚和140个单原核(1PN)来源囊胚的倍性状况。所有囊胚均采用滋养外胚层活检和NGS检测。参与者/材料设置方法:方法基于ulc-WGS数据。首先,基于已知倍性状态的样本:高频双等位基因snp的杂合率,利用1000基因组计划数据库中测量的等位基因频率和连锁不平衡(LD),在不同的假设(来自单亲的“双亲同源”[BPH],来自每个亲本的“单亲同源”[SPH],来自二体和单体)下计算等位基因的似然比(LLR)。纳入23个连续候选特征,这些特征来自于染色体的杂合率和llr或选择的窗口,以建立倍性预测AI模型。采用基尼重要性分析和多重共线性缓解方法进行特征选择,然后比较随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和逻辑回归(Logistic Regression)的建模性能。随后,基于射频模型进行了参数优化。对已知倍性状态样本进行倍性结构一致性评价。评估正常受精PGT囊胚和1pn囊胚(包括常规IVF和ICSI)异常倍性的频率。主要结果和偶然性的作用:与SVM和Logistic回归相比,收集了11个特征用于模型架构;RF在倍性检测方面具有优异的性能。AI模型对全基因组单倍体(GW-UPD)的AUC为1,对三倍体的AUC为1,对二倍体的AUC为0.99。在792个验证样本中,99.5%的样本被人工智能模型成功检测,该模型对倍性分类的准确率为100%。在临床应用阶段,在19103份PGT样本中,19069份使用该模型成功分析,其中110份(0.57%)鉴定为异常倍性胚胎。其中,12.7%(14/110)为GW-UPD, 87.3%(96/110)为三倍体。移植二倍体囊胚5563例,成功妊娠3478例。随后对217例自然流产和935例产前诊断样本进行倍性分析,未发现异常倍性。此外,140个1PN胚胎中,40个(28.6%)表现为GW-UPD, 3个(2.1%)表现为三倍体,97个(69.3%)被确定为双亲本和正常受精。在97个双亲本胚胎中,46个为二倍体,11个为嵌合体,40个为非整倍体。在授精方式方面,ICSI中异常倍性的百分比明显高于常规IVF (P)。局限性:一些罕见的倍性异常,如具有相同数量染色体的多倍体和倍性嵌合体不能准确识别。此外,由于无法从父母双方获得DNA,因此无法确定异常倍性的起源。研究结果的更广泛意义:PGT-Plus AI模型提供了一种基于传统PGT-A数据的倍性评估方法,并直接集成到标准PGT-A工作流程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accurate identification of abnormal ploidy using an artificial intelligence model in preimplantation genetic testing.

Study question: Can ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (ulc-WGS) accurately identify abnormal ploidy during preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)?

Summary answer: The artificial intelligence (AI)-based PGT-Plus model demonstrates high accuracy in ploidy detection, offering a cost-effective solution that enhances clinical utility of PGT.

What is known already: The predominant PGT for aneuploidy can identify chromosomal aneuploidies but cannot determine ploidy status. Transferring embryos with ploidy abnormalities can result in miscarriage and molar pregnancy. On the other hand, in ART, fertilization is assessed by morphological pronuclear assessment at the zygote stage. However, it has a low specificity in the prediction of abnormal ploidy status and embryos deemed abnormally fertilized can yield healthy pregnancies. Accurately identified abnormal ploidy in PGT-A can resolve current limitations and expand the utility range of PGT-A. Several studies have identified ploidy abnormalities; however, they were mainly based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays or needed to combine additional targeted-next-generation sequencing (NGS) information. Studies based on ulc-WGS remain scarce.

Study design size duration: The study consisted of two stages: methodology establishment and validation. An AI model, named PGT-Plus, was developed using 653 samples with known ploidy status, which was further validated using 792 different ploidy status samples. In the clinical application stage, the approach was used to analyse the ploidy status of 19 103 normally fertilized PGT blastocysts and 140 single pronucleus (1PN)-derived blastocysts collected between May 2022 and December 2023. All blastocysts were tested using trophectoderm biopsy and NGS.

Participants/materials setting methods: The methodology is based on the ulc-WGS data. First, based on samples with known ploidy status: the heterozygosity rate of high-frequency biallelic SNPs, the likelihood ratio (LLR) of alleles was calculated under different assumptions ('both parental homologs' [BPH] from a single parent, 'single parental homolog' [SPH] from each parent, disomy, and monosomy) by leveraging allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium (LD) measured in the 1000 genomes project database. Twenty-three continuous candidate features derived from heterozygosity rates and LLRs of chromosomes or selected windows were included to establish the ploidy prediction AI model. Gini importance analysis and multicollinearity mitigation was performed for feature selection, then the performance of Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression for modelling was compared. Subsequently, the parameter optimization was performed based on the RF model. Ploidy constitution concordance was evaluated in known ploidy status samples. The frequency of abnormal ploidy in normal fertilized PGT blastocysts and 1PN-derived blastocysts (including conventional IVF and ICSI) was evaluated.

Main results and the role of chance: Eleven features were collected for model architecture compared to SVM and Logistic Regression; RF achieved superior performance for ploidy detection. The AI model achieved an AUC of 1 for genome-wide-uniparental diploidy (GW-UPD), 1 for triploidy, and 0.99 for diploidy. For the 792 validation samples, 99.5% of samples were successfully detected using the AI model, and the model showed 100% accuracy for ploidy classification. In the clinical application stage, out of 19 103 PGT samples, 19 069 were successfully analysed using the model, with 110 (0.57%) identified as having abnormal ploidy embryos. Among these, 12.7% (14/110) were identified as GW-UPD, and 87.3% (96/110) were triploid. Among 5563 diploid blastocysts transferred, 3478 clinical pregnancies were achieved. Subsequent ploidy analysis was performed for 217 spontaneous abortion and 935 prenatal diagnostic samples, and no abnormal ploidy was identified. Furthermore, of the 140 1PN embryos tested, 40 (28.6%) exhibited GW-UPD, 3 (2.1%) exhibited triploidy, and 97 (69.3%) were determined to be biparental and normally fertilized. Among the 97 biparental embryos, 46 were diploid, 11 were mosaic, and 40 were aneuploid. In terms of the insemination pattern, the percentage of abnormal ploidy in ICSI was significantly higher than in conventional IVF (P < 0.01, 37.1% vs. 2.9%, respectively). With full informed consent, 20 patients without euploidy from normal fertilization chose 1PN-derived biparental and diploid blastocysts to transfer, resulting in 10 clinical pregnancies and 9 ongoing pregnancies.

Large-scale data: N/A.

Limitations reasons for caution: Some rare ploidy abnormalities, such as polyploidy with an equal number of identical sets of chromosomes and ploidy mosaicism cannot be accurately identified. Moreover, the origin of abnormal ploidy was not identified due to the unavailability of DNA from both parents.

Wider implications of the findings: The PGT-Plus AI model provides a ploidy evaluation method based on the conventional PGT-A data and integrates directly into standard PGT-A workflows. Clinical utility results suggest that the model is a valuable tool for identifying embryos with abnormal ploidy in PGT-A and rescuing normal diploid embryos from abnormally fertilized embryos. These findings demonstrate that PGT-Plus significantly enhances the diagnostic accuracy of PGT.

Study funding/competing interests: This study was supported by grants from Major Scientific Program of CITIC Group (No. 2023ZXKYB34100, to Ge.L.), Hunan Provincial Grant for Innovative Province Construction (2019SK4012), Hunan Xiangjiang New District (Changsha High-tech Zone) key core technology research project in 2023, and Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant 2023JJ30422). All authors declared no conflicts of interest..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信