{"title":"标题:鞘内培美曲塞治疗肺腺癌轻脑膜转移:临床疗效和多重液体蛋白质组学探索研究。","authors":"Zhi Wang, Peng Ding, Hongxia Zhou, Bohua Kuang, Ruiguang Zhang, Lingjuan Chen, Xing Zhang, Minghui Ge, Yaqin Liu, Fan Tong, Xiaorong Dong","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is an advanced complication of lung cancer with a poor prognosis. It remains unknown whether intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) can improve the outcomes of patients with LM from lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study explored the efficacy of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) and proteomic biomarkers in LM from LUAD.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective survival analysis of 157 confirmed LM patients (54 IP vs 103 non-IP). To balance the baseline, propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented. We investigated clinical baseline characteristics and treatment factors to identify those influencing the outcomes of LM patients. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples underwent proteomic profiling using Olink Immuno-Oncology panels to identify IP response biomarkers and build a prediction model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 82 patients were included in two matched cohort (41 IP vs 41 non-IP). IP treatment (HR = 0.427, P = .022) and ECOG performance status (HR = 2.737, P = .005) were independent predictors of overall survival (OS). Stratified analysis showed IP significantly improved OS in patients with poor performance status (ECOG 3-4: IP vs non-IP, 11.2 vs 2.5 months, P = .0029). Proteomics revealed low plasma MCP-2 (AUC = 0.873) and high CSF ARG1 (AUC = 0.875) levels distinguished IP responders from nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IP therapy improves OS in LUAD patients with LM, particularly offering significant benefit as salvage treatment for those with ECOG 3-4. Proteomic analysis suggests plasma MCP-2 and CSF ARG1 are promising predictive biomarkers for IP response. The small sample size in biomarker analysis may limit these findings, necessitating validation through multicenter studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12539920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrathecal pemetrexed for leptomeningeal metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma: a clinical efficacy and multiplex liquid proteomics exploration study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhi Wang, Peng Ding, Hongxia Zhou, Bohua Kuang, Ruiguang Zhang, Lingjuan Chen, Xing Zhang, Minghui Ge, Yaqin Liu, Fan Tong, Xiaorong Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is an advanced complication of lung cancer with a poor prognosis. It remains unknown whether intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) can improve the outcomes of patients with LM from lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study explored the efficacy of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) and proteomic biomarkers in LM from LUAD.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective survival analysis of 157 confirmed LM patients (54 IP vs 103 non-IP). To balance the baseline, propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented. We investigated clinical baseline characteristics and treatment factors to identify those influencing the outcomes of LM patients. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples underwent proteomic profiling using Olink Immuno-Oncology panels to identify IP response biomarkers and build a prediction model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 82 patients were included in two matched cohort (41 IP vs 41 non-IP). IP treatment (HR = 0.427, P = .022) and ECOG performance status (HR = 2.737, P = .005) were independent predictors of overall survival (OS). Stratified analysis showed IP significantly improved OS in patients with poor performance status (ECOG 3-4: IP vs non-IP, 11.2 vs 2.5 months, P = .0029). Proteomics revealed low plasma MCP-2 (AUC = 0.873) and high CSF ARG1 (AUC = 0.875) levels distinguished IP responders from nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IP therapy improves OS in LUAD patients with LM, particularly offering significant benefit as salvage treatment for those with ECOG 3-4. Proteomic analysis suggests plasma MCP-2 and CSF ARG1 are promising predictive biomarkers for IP response. The small sample size in biomarker analysis may limit these findings, necessitating validation through multicenter studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12539920/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf291\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:轻脑膜转移(LM)是肺癌的晚期并发症,预后较差。鞘内培美曲塞(IP)是否能改善肺腺癌(LUAD) LM患者的预后尚不清楚。本研究探讨了鞘内培美曲塞(IP)和蛋白质组学生物标志物在LUAD LM中的作用。方法:我们对157例确诊的LM患者(54例IP vs 103例非IP)进行了回顾性生存分析。为了平衡基线,采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)。我们研究了临床基线特征和治疗因素,以确定影响LM患者预后的因素。使用Olink免疫肿瘤学小组对血浆和脑脊液(CSF)样本进行蛋白质组学分析,以确定IP反应生物标志物并建立预测模型。结果:在PSM后,82例患者被纳入两个匹配的队列(41例IP vs 41例非IP)。IP治疗(HR = 0.427, P = 0.022)和ECOG表现状态(HR = 2.737, P = 0.005)是总生存(OS)的独立预测因子。分层分析显示,IP显著改善了表现不佳患者的OS (ECOG 3-4: IP vs.非IP, 11.2 vs. 2.5个月,P = 0.0029)。蛋白质组学显示低血浆MCP-2 (AUC = 0.873)和高CSF ARG1 (AUC = 0.875)水平区分了IP应答者和无应答者。结论:IP治疗可改善LUAD合并LM患者的OS,特别是对ECOG 3-4患者提供显著的补救性治疗。蛋白质组学分析表明血浆MCP-2和CSF ARG1是有希望预测IP反应的生物标志物。生物标志物分析的小样本量可能会限制这些发现,需要通过多中心研究进行验证。
Intrathecal pemetrexed for leptomeningeal metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma: a clinical efficacy and multiplex liquid proteomics exploration study.
Background: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is an advanced complication of lung cancer with a poor prognosis. It remains unknown whether intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) can improve the outcomes of patients with LM from lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study explored the efficacy of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) and proteomic biomarkers in LM from LUAD.
Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective survival analysis of 157 confirmed LM patients (54 IP vs 103 non-IP). To balance the baseline, propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented. We investigated clinical baseline characteristics and treatment factors to identify those influencing the outcomes of LM patients. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples underwent proteomic profiling using Olink Immuno-Oncology panels to identify IP response biomarkers and build a prediction model.
Results: After PSM, 82 patients were included in two matched cohort (41 IP vs 41 non-IP). IP treatment (HR = 0.427, P = .022) and ECOG performance status (HR = 2.737, P = .005) were independent predictors of overall survival (OS). Stratified analysis showed IP significantly improved OS in patients with poor performance status (ECOG 3-4: IP vs non-IP, 11.2 vs 2.5 months, P = .0029). Proteomics revealed low plasma MCP-2 (AUC = 0.873) and high CSF ARG1 (AUC = 0.875) levels distinguished IP responders from nonresponders.
Conclusions: IP therapy improves OS in LUAD patients with LM, particularly offering significant benefit as salvage treatment for those with ECOG 3-4. Proteomic analysis suggests plasma MCP-2 and CSF ARG1 are promising predictive biomarkers for IP response. The small sample size in biomarker analysis may limit these findings, necessitating validation through multicenter studies.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.