机器人辅助救助性前列腺切除术:EAU选择标准的外部验证和最佳候选人的确定:一项初级ERUS/YAU合作研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Prostate Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI:10.1002/pros.70048
Mike Wenzel, Christoph Würnschimmel, Arjun Nathan, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Christian Wagner, Giorgio Calleris, Fabrizio Di Maida, Juan Gomez Rivas, Carlo Andrea Bravi, Ruben De Groote, Federico Piramide, Filippo Turri, Keith Kowalczyk, Gopal Sharma, Iulia Andras, Edward Lambert, Nikolaos Liakos, Danny Darlington, Marco Paciotti, Gabriele Sorce, Philipp Mandel, Antonio Galfano, Senthil Nathan, Giancarlo Marra, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Alexandre Mottrie, Felix K H Chun, Vipul Patel, Alberto Breda, Alessandro Larcher
{"title":"机器人辅助救助性前列腺切除术:EAU选择标准的外部验证和最佳候选人的确定:一项初级ERUS/YAU合作研究。","authors":"Mike Wenzel, Christoph Würnschimmel, Arjun Nathan, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Christian Wagner, Giorgio Calleris, Fabrizio Di Maida, Juan Gomez Rivas, Carlo Andrea Bravi, Ruben De Groote, Federico Piramide, Filippo Turri, Keith Kowalczyk, Gopal Sharma, Iulia Andras, Edward Lambert, Nikolaos Liakos, Danny Darlington, Marco Paciotti, Gabriele Sorce, Philipp Mandel, Antonio Galfano, Senthil Nathan, Giancarlo Marra, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Alexandre Mottrie, Felix K H Chun, Vipul Patel, Alberto Breda, Alessandro Larcher","doi":"10.1002/pros.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>EAU guidelines recommend salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) only in highly selected patients with recurrent prostate cancer in experienced centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Junior ERUS/Young Academic Urologist Working Group on Robot-Assisted Surgery conducted a multicentric project to investigate biochemical recurrence-free (BCR), metastases-free (MFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes in robotic sRP patients stratified according to EAU criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 180 patients, 49% fulfilled EAU criteria. Patients not fulfilling EAU criteria more frequently underwent focal therapy as primary treatment (53% vs. 33%) and exhibited significantly higher rates of pT3-4 (70% vs. 48%), positive surgical margins (48% vs. 24%), and pathological Gleason score 8-10 (72% vs. 48%, all p < 0.01), with no differences in postoperative complications. Rates of PSA persistence were significantly higher in patients not fulfilling EAU criteria (16% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Regarding BCR, patients not fulfilling EAU criteria harbored significantly worse BCR-free survival (hazard ratio (HR): 1.96, p = 0.046) with 24- and 48-month BCR-free survival rates of 81.7% and 73.9% vs. 65.0% and 58.5% for patients fulfilling EAU criteria. After multivariable adjustment, patients not fulfilling EAU criteria harbored higher risk of BCR (HR: 2.94, p = 0.045). Regarding MFS and OS outcomes, no significant differences were observed in the comparison between both groups. Incorporating presalvage surgery features into a new classification yielded better discrimination for BCR analysis, but were comparable to EAU criteria for MFS and OS outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of patients do not fulfill EAU criteria, and even more so after focal therapy. These patients harbor worse BCR rates after robotic sRP. However, within our short-term follow-up, no differences in MFS and OS were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-Assisted Salvage Prostatectomy: External Validation of the EAU Selection Criteria and Identification of the Optimal Candidate: A Junior ERUS/YAU Collaborative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mike Wenzel, Christoph Würnschimmel, Arjun Nathan, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Christian Wagner, Giorgio Calleris, Fabrizio Di Maida, Juan Gomez Rivas, Carlo Andrea Bravi, Ruben De Groote, Federico Piramide, Filippo Turri, Keith Kowalczyk, Gopal Sharma, Iulia Andras, Edward Lambert, Nikolaos Liakos, Danny Darlington, Marco Paciotti, Gabriele Sorce, Philipp Mandel, Antonio Galfano, Senthil Nathan, Giancarlo Marra, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Alexandre Mottrie, Felix K H Chun, Vipul Patel, Alberto Breda, Alessandro Larcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.70048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>EAU guidelines recommend salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) only in highly selected patients with recurrent prostate cancer in experienced centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Junior ERUS/Young Academic Urologist Working Group on Robot-Assisted Surgery conducted a multicentric project to investigate biochemical recurrence-free (BCR), metastases-free (MFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes in robotic sRP patients stratified according to EAU criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 180 patients, 49% fulfilled EAU criteria. Patients not fulfilling EAU criteria more frequently underwent focal therapy as primary treatment (53% vs. 33%) and exhibited significantly higher rates of pT3-4 (70% vs. 48%), positive surgical margins (48% vs. 24%), and pathological Gleason score 8-10 (72% vs. 48%, all p < 0.01), with no differences in postoperative complications. Rates of PSA persistence were significantly higher in patients not fulfilling EAU criteria (16% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Regarding BCR, patients not fulfilling EAU criteria harbored significantly worse BCR-free survival (hazard ratio (HR): 1.96, p = 0.046) with 24- and 48-month BCR-free survival rates of 81.7% and 73.9% vs. 65.0% and 58.5% for patients fulfilling EAU criteria. After multivariable adjustment, patients not fulfilling EAU criteria harbored higher risk of BCR (HR: 2.94, p = 0.045). Regarding MFS and OS outcomes, no significant differences were observed in the comparison between both groups. Incorporating presalvage surgery features into a new classification yielded better discrimination for BCR analysis, but were comparable to EAU criteria for MFS and OS outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of patients do not fulfill EAU criteria, and even more so after focal therapy. These patients harbor worse BCR rates after robotic sRP. However, within our short-term follow-up, no differences in MFS and OS were observed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70048\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:EAU指南推荐仅在经验丰富的中心对高度选定的复发性前列腺癌患者行挽救性根治性前列腺切除术(sRP)。方法:Junior ERUS/Young学术泌尿外科医生机器人辅助手术工作组开展了一项多中心项目,研究根据EAU标准分层的机器人sRP患者的生化无复发(BCR)、无转移(MFS)和总生存(OS)结果。结果:180例患者中,49%符合EAU标准。不符合EAU标准的患者更常接受局灶治疗作为主要治疗(53%对33%),并且pT3-4(70%对48%)、手术切缘阳性(48%对24%)和病理Gleason评分8-10(72%对48%)的比例明显更高,均为p。结论:大多数患者不符合EAU标准,局灶治疗后更是如此。这些患者在机器人sRP后BCR率更差。然而,在我们的短期随访中,没有观察到MFS和OS的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robot-Assisted Salvage Prostatectomy: External Validation of the EAU Selection Criteria and Identification of the Optimal Candidate: A Junior ERUS/YAU Collaborative Study.

Background: EAU guidelines recommend salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) only in highly selected patients with recurrent prostate cancer in experienced centers.

Methods: The Junior ERUS/Young Academic Urologist Working Group on Robot-Assisted Surgery conducted a multicentric project to investigate biochemical recurrence-free (BCR), metastases-free (MFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes in robotic sRP patients stratified according to EAU criteria.

Results: Of 180 patients, 49% fulfilled EAU criteria. Patients not fulfilling EAU criteria more frequently underwent focal therapy as primary treatment (53% vs. 33%) and exhibited significantly higher rates of pT3-4 (70% vs. 48%), positive surgical margins (48% vs. 24%), and pathological Gleason score 8-10 (72% vs. 48%, all p < 0.01), with no differences in postoperative complications. Rates of PSA persistence were significantly higher in patients not fulfilling EAU criteria (16% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Regarding BCR, patients not fulfilling EAU criteria harbored significantly worse BCR-free survival (hazard ratio (HR): 1.96, p = 0.046) with 24- and 48-month BCR-free survival rates of 81.7% and 73.9% vs. 65.0% and 58.5% for patients fulfilling EAU criteria. After multivariable adjustment, patients not fulfilling EAU criteria harbored higher risk of BCR (HR: 2.94, p = 0.045). Regarding MFS and OS outcomes, no significant differences were observed in the comparison between both groups. Incorporating presalvage surgery features into a new classification yielded better discrimination for BCR analysis, but were comparable to EAU criteria for MFS and OS outcomes.

Conclusions: The majority of patients do not fulfill EAU criteria, and even more so after focal therapy. These patients harbor worse BCR rates after robotic sRP. However, within our short-term follow-up, no differences in MFS and OS were observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate
Prostate 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信