机器学习方法预测头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者游离皮瓣重建后手术部位感染。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hanchen Zhou, Chuning Luo, Qiaoshi Xu, Chong Wang, Bo Li, Delong Li, Huan Liu, Hao Wang, Chang Liu, Jingrui Li, Teng Ma, Fen Liu, Zhien Feng
{"title":"机器学习方法预测头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者游离皮瓣重建后手术部位感染。","authors":"Hanchen Zhou, Chuning Luo, Qiaoshi Xu, Chong Wang, Bo Li, Delong Li, Huan Liu, Hao Wang, Chang Liu, Jingrui Li, Teng Ma, Fen Liu, Zhien Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients undergoing free flap reconstruction face a high risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Logistic regression (LR) models for SSI prediction are limited by linear assumptions, while machine learning (ML) approaches like random forest (RF) may offer superior performance by handling complex clinical data. This study aimed to identify SSI risk factors and compare the predictive performance of LR and RF models. This retrospective study included 442 HNSCC patients. Two predictive models were constructed based on LR and RF methods, respectively. The predictive performance of two models was assessed based on area under the receiver operator characteristic curves, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied in the RF model to analyze the impact of features on prediction results. The RF model outperformed LR, achieving higher accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Calibration curves indicated superior alignment of RF predictions with observed outcomes. DCA revealed higher net benefits for RF across a wide probability threshold range. SHAP analysis identified PNI, operation time, and NLR as top predictors. Novel systemic markers (PNI, NLR) and clinical factors are critical for risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning approach to predict surgical site infection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients after free flap reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Hanchen Zhou, Chuning Luo, Qiaoshi Xu, Chong Wang, Bo Li, Delong Li, Huan Liu, Hao Wang, Chang Liu, Jingrui Li, Teng Ma, Fen Liu, Zhien Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients undergoing free flap reconstruction face a high risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Logistic regression (LR) models for SSI prediction are limited by linear assumptions, while machine learning (ML) approaches like random forest (RF) may offer superior performance by handling complex clinical data. This study aimed to identify SSI risk factors and compare the predictive performance of LR and RF models. This retrospective study included 442 HNSCC patients. Two predictive models were constructed based on LR and RF methods, respectively. The predictive performance of two models was assessed based on area under the receiver operator characteristic curves, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied in the RF model to analyze the impact of features on prediction results. The RF model outperformed LR, achieving higher accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Calibration curves indicated superior alignment of RF predictions with observed outcomes. DCA revealed higher net benefits for RF across a wide probability threshold range. SHAP analysis identified PNI, operation time, and NLR as top predictors. Novel systemic markers (PNI, NLR) and clinical factors are critical for risk stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.09.010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.09.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者接受游离皮瓣重建面临手术部位感染(SSI)的高风险。用于SSI预测的逻辑回归(LR)模型受到线性假设的限制,而随机森林(RF)等机器学习(ML)方法可能通过处理复杂的临床数据提供卓越的性能。本研究旨在确定SSI的危险因素,并比较LR和RF模型的预测性能。本回顾性研究纳入了442例HNSCC患者。分别基于LR和RF方法构建了两个预测模型。基于接收算子特征曲线下面积、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)对两种模型的预测性能进行了评估。RF模型采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析特征对预测结果的影响。RF模型优于LR,具有更高的准确性、灵敏度、特异性和AUC。校准曲线显示RF预测与观察结果非常吻合。DCA显示,在较宽的概率阈值范围内,射频的净收益更高。SHAP分析确定PNI、手术时间和NLR是最重要的预测因子。新的系统标志物(PNI, NLR)和临床因素是危险分层的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning approach to predict surgical site infection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients after free flap reconstruction.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients undergoing free flap reconstruction face a high risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Logistic regression (LR) models for SSI prediction are limited by linear assumptions, while machine learning (ML) approaches like random forest (RF) may offer superior performance by handling complex clinical data. This study aimed to identify SSI risk factors and compare the predictive performance of LR and RF models. This retrospective study included 442 HNSCC patients. Two predictive models were constructed based on LR and RF methods, respectively. The predictive performance of two models was assessed based on area under the receiver operator characteristic curves, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied in the RF model to analyze the impact of features on prediction results. The RF model outperformed LR, achieving higher accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Calibration curves indicated superior alignment of RF predictions with observed outcomes. DCA revealed higher net benefits for RF across a wide probability threshold range. SHAP analysis identified PNI, operation time, and NLR as top predictors. Novel systemic markers (PNI, NLR) and clinical factors are critical for risk stratification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信