{"title":"椎体旋转作为脊髓性肌萎缩患者脊柱侧凸矫正后残留畸形的预测因子:回顾性分析。","authors":"Chen-Yu Hung, Pin-Yi Tu, Wen-Chen Liang, Cheng-Chang Lu, Yin-Chun Tien, Yuh-Jyh Jong, Shih-Hsiang Chou, Li-Min Chen, Po-Chih Shen","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the impact of preoperative vertebral rotation (VR) on the surgical outcomes in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) scoliosis. A retrospective analysis of 27 SMA patients (mean age 13.4 ± 4.3 years) who underwent scoliosis surgery between 2015 and 2019 was conducted. Preoperative VR was measured using Aaro-Dahlborn's and Ho's methods on computed tomography images. Surgical outcome prediction was evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient, linear stepwise regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and logistic regression analyses. Ho's method yielded significantly higher VR measurements than Aaro-Dahlborn's ( P < 0.001). Postoperative Cobb angles correlated positively with preoperative Cobb angles ( r ² = 0.425, P = 0.0002), Ho's method VR ( r ² = 0.449, P = 0.0001), and Aaro-Dahlborn's method VR ( r ² = 0.4352, P = 0.0002). Stepwise regression identified preoperative Ho's method VR and Cobb angles as independent predictors of postoperative Cobb angles. Postoperative Cobb angles >30 ° indicated increased risk of deformity progression in SMA. ROC curve analysis showed preoperative Ho's method VR significantly predicted postoperative Cobb angles >30 ° (area under the curve: 0.813, P = 0.006), with an optimal cutoff of 35 °. Logistic regression analysis revealed patients with preoperative Ho's method VR > 35 ° had a higher risk of postoperative Cobb angles >30 ° (odds ratio: 10.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.050-102.261, P = 0.045). This study demonstrated that Ho's method better predicted surgical outcomes, with preoperative Ho's method VR > 35 ° at the apex associated with higher initial residual scoliosis curves after surgery. These findings could enhance surgical planning and improve outcome predictions in SMA scoliosis correction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vertebral rotation as a predictor of residual deformity following scoliosis correction in spinal muscular atrophy: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chen-Yu Hung, Pin-Yi Tu, Wen-Chen Liang, Cheng-Chang Lu, Yin-Chun Tien, Yuh-Jyh Jong, Shih-Hsiang Chou, Li-Min Chen, Po-Chih Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the impact of preoperative vertebral rotation (VR) on the surgical outcomes in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) scoliosis. A retrospective analysis of 27 SMA patients (mean age 13.4 ± 4.3 years) who underwent scoliosis surgery between 2015 and 2019 was conducted. Preoperative VR was measured using Aaro-Dahlborn's and Ho's methods on computed tomography images. Surgical outcome prediction was evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient, linear stepwise regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and logistic regression analyses. Ho's method yielded significantly higher VR measurements than Aaro-Dahlborn's ( P < 0.001). Postoperative Cobb angles correlated positively with preoperative Cobb angles ( r ² = 0.425, P = 0.0002), Ho's method VR ( r ² = 0.449, P = 0.0001), and Aaro-Dahlborn's method VR ( r ² = 0.4352, P = 0.0002). Stepwise regression identified preoperative Ho's method VR and Cobb angles as independent predictors of postoperative Cobb angles. Postoperative Cobb angles >30 ° indicated increased risk of deformity progression in SMA. ROC curve analysis showed preoperative Ho's method VR significantly predicted postoperative Cobb angles >30 ° (area under the curve: 0.813, P = 0.006), with an optimal cutoff of 35 °. Logistic regression analysis revealed patients with preoperative Ho's method VR > 35 ° had a higher risk of postoperative Cobb angles >30 ° (odds ratio: 10.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.050-102.261, P = 0.045). This study demonstrated that Ho's method better predicted surgical outcomes, with preoperative Ho's method VR > 35 ° at the apex associated with higher initial residual scoliosis curves after surgery. These findings could enhance surgical planning and improve outcome predictions in SMA scoliosis correction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001293\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vertebral rotation as a predictor of residual deformity following scoliosis correction in spinal muscular atrophy: a retrospective analysis.
This study investigated the impact of preoperative vertebral rotation (VR) on the surgical outcomes in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) scoliosis. A retrospective analysis of 27 SMA patients (mean age 13.4 ± 4.3 years) who underwent scoliosis surgery between 2015 and 2019 was conducted. Preoperative VR was measured using Aaro-Dahlborn's and Ho's methods on computed tomography images. Surgical outcome prediction was evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient, linear stepwise regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and logistic regression analyses. Ho's method yielded significantly higher VR measurements than Aaro-Dahlborn's ( P < 0.001). Postoperative Cobb angles correlated positively with preoperative Cobb angles ( r ² = 0.425, P = 0.0002), Ho's method VR ( r ² = 0.449, P = 0.0001), and Aaro-Dahlborn's method VR ( r ² = 0.4352, P = 0.0002). Stepwise regression identified preoperative Ho's method VR and Cobb angles as independent predictors of postoperative Cobb angles. Postoperative Cobb angles >30 ° indicated increased risk of deformity progression in SMA. ROC curve analysis showed preoperative Ho's method VR significantly predicted postoperative Cobb angles >30 ° (area under the curve: 0.813, P = 0.006), with an optimal cutoff of 35 °. Logistic regression analysis revealed patients with preoperative Ho's method VR > 35 ° had a higher risk of postoperative Cobb angles >30 ° (odds ratio: 10.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.050-102.261, P = 0.045). This study demonstrated that Ho's method better predicted surgical outcomes, with preoperative Ho's method VR > 35 ° at the apex associated with higher initial residual scoliosis curves after surgery. These findings could enhance surgical planning and improve outcome predictions in SMA scoliosis correction.
期刊介绍:
The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders.
It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies).
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.