系统发育不一致主要是由于在主要被子植物谱系分化早期普遍存在的古代杂交和不完整的谱系分选所致。

IF 11.6 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Xiaomei Huang, Lingxiao Yang, Xiaoya Ma, Zhiping Yang, Qiuping Wang, Hao Wang, Ya Yang, Diego F Morales-Briones, Bojian Zhong
{"title":"系统发育不一致主要是由于在主要被子植物谱系分化早期普遍存在的古代杂交和不完整的谱系分选所致。","authors":"Xiaomei Huang, Lingxiao Yang, Xiaoya Ma, Zhiping Yang, Qiuping Wang, Hao Wang, Ya Yang, Diego F Morales-Briones, Bojian Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most extant angiosperms belong to Mesangiospermae (eudicots, monocots, magnoliids, Chloranthales, and Ceratophyllales). Resolving the evolutionary relationships among the five lineages of Mesangiospermae is important for understanding the early diversification process of angiosperms. However, the rapid early diversification of angiosperms within a short geological period complicates the untangling of phylogenetic relationships among these Mesangiospermae lineages. Here, we used 177 publicly available angiosperm genomes to reconstruct the phylogeny of Mesangiospermae using multiple orthology inference approaches, character coding schemes, and data filtering criteria. Importantly, we investigated the potential causes of phylogenetic discordance and inferred phylogenetic networks to explore reticulating events among the five lineages of Mesangiospermae. Coalescent simulation analyses suggested that a combination of incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization could explain the high levels of discordance among nuclear genes in the backbone of Mesangiospermae. Cytonuclear discordance was observed among the five Mesangiospermae lineages, potentially resulting from hybridization. Furthermore, systematic errors in species networks cannot be overlooked. Our study revealed that deep phylogenetic discordances among the five Mesangiospermae lineages were affected by multiple factors, particularly pervasive ancient hybridization.</p>","PeriodicalId":52373,"journal":{"name":"Plant Communications","volume":" ","pages":"101529"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phylogenomic discordance is mainly driven by pervasive ancient hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting during the early divergence of major angiosperm lineages.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaomei Huang, Lingxiao Yang, Xiaoya Ma, Zhiping Yang, Qiuping Wang, Hao Wang, Ya Yang, Diego F Morales-Briones, Bojian Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most extant angiosperms belong to Mesangiospermae (eudicots, monocots, magnoliids, Chloranthales, and Ceratophyllales). Resolving the evolutionary relationships among the five lineages of Mesangiospermae is important for understanding the early diversification process of angiosperms. However, the rapid early diversification of angiosperms within a short geological period complicates the untangling of phylogenetic relationships among these Mesangiospermae lineages. Here, we used 177 publicly available angiosperm genomes to reconstruct the phylogeny of Mesangiospermae using multiple orthology inference approaches, character coding schemes, and data filtering criteria. Importantly, we investigated the potential causes of phylogenetic discordance and inferred phylogenetic networks to explore reticulating events among the five lineages of Mesangiospermae. Coalescent simulation analyses suggested that a combination of incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization could explain the high levels of discordance among nuclear genes in the backbone of Mesangiospermae. Cytonuclear discordance was observed among the five Mesangiospermae lineages, potentially resulting from hybridization. Furthermore, systematic errors in species networks cannot be overlooked. Our study revealed that deep phylogenetic discordances among the five Mesangiospermae lineages were affected by multiple factors, particularly pervasive ancient hybridization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101529\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Communications","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101529","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数现存被子植物属于中被子植物科(菊科、单子科、木兰科、叶兰科和角苔科)。解决中被子植物5个世系间的进化关系对理解被子植物早期分化过程具有重要意义。然而,被子植物在较短的地质时期内的早期快速多样化使得解开这些中被子植物谱系之间的系统发育关系变得复杂。在此,我们使用177个公开的被子植物基因组,使用多种同源推断方法、字符编码方案和数据过滤标准重建了中被子植物的系统发育。重要的是,我们研究了系统发育不一致的潜在原因,并推断了系统发育网络,以探索中被子植物5个谱系之间的网状事件。聚结模拟分析表明,不完全谱系分类和杂交的结合可以解释中被子植物主干核基因之间的高度不一致。在5个中被子植物谱系中观察到细胞核不一致,可能是由于杂交造成的。此外,物种网络中的系统误差也不容忽视。我们的研究表明,5个中被子植物谱系之间的深层系统发育差异受多种因素的影响,特别是普遍存在的古代杂交。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phylogenomic discordance is mainly driven by pervasive ancient hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting during the early divergence of major angiosperm lineages.

Most extant angiosperms belong to Mesangiospermae (eudicots, monocots, magnoliids, Chloranthales, and Ceratophyllales). Resolving the evolutionary relationships among the five lineages of Mesangiospermae is important for understanding the early diversification process of angiosperms. However, the rapid early diversification of angiosperms within a short geological period complicates the untangling of phylogenetic relationships among these Mesangiospermae lineages. Here, we used 177 publicly available angiosperm genomes to reconstruct the phylogeny of Mesangiospermae using multiple orthology inference approaches, character coding schemes, and data filtering criteria. Importantly, we investigated the potential causes of phylogenetic discordance and inferred phylogenetic networks to explore reticulating events among the five lineages of Mesangiospermae. Coalescent simulation analyses suggested that a combination of incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization could explain the high levels of discordance among nuclear genes in the backbone of Mesangiospermae. Cytonuclear discordance was observed among the five Mesangiospermae lineages, potentially resulting from hybridization. Furthermore, systematic errors in species networks cannot be overlooked. Our study revealed that deep phylogenetic discordances among the five Mesangiospermae lineages were affected by multiple factors, particularly pervasive ancient hybridization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Communications
Plant Communications Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Plant Communications is an open access publishing platform that supports the global plant science community. It publishes original research, review articles, technical advances, and research resources in various areas of plant sciences. The scope of topics includes evolution, ecology, physiology, biochemistry, development, reproduction, metabolism, molecular and cellular biology, genetics, genomics, environmental interactions, biotechnology, breeding of higher and lower plants, and their interactions with other organisms. The goal of Plant Communications is to provide a high-quality platform for the dissemination of plant science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信