梗阻性结肠癌:回顾与展望。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Antoine Cazelles, Gaetan Pasinato, Mathilde Aubert, Gilles Manceau, Diane Mege, Charles Sabbagh, Mehdi Karoui
{"title":"梗阻性结肠癌:回顾与展望。","authors":"Antoine Cazelles, Gaetan Pasinato, Mathilde Aubert, Gilles Manceau, Diane Mege, Charles Sabbagh, Mehdi Karoui","doi":"10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obstructed colon cancer (OCC) accounts for approximately 25% of colorectal cancer at the time of diagnosis and represents a surgical emergency creating a dual challenge: (i) the management of an acute mechanical colonic obstruction with potentially life-threatening consequences (fluid and electrolyte disturbances, systemic deterioration, colonic ischemia, stercoral stasis); and (ii) the treatment of an advanced primary or metastatic malignancy, often in elderly or frail patients with significant comorbidities. For right-sided OCC, right hemicolectomy with or without ileocolic anastomosis is the recommended approach, while a primary diverting ileostomy as a bridge to delayed right colectomy may be considered a safe alternative. For left-sided OCC, a diverting colostomy allows for subsequent oncological colectomy following complete disease staging and patient optimization. Hartmann's procedure should be reserved for perforated OCC, whereas (sub)total colectomy is indicated in cases of proximal colonic ischemia. In the setting of ischemia or perforation of a markedly distended proximal colon, a bowel-preserving (or colonic-sparing) strategy consisting of ileocecal resection with ileocolostomy - temporarily leaving the primary tumor in situ - may represent an alternative to (sub)total colectomy. Colonic stenting can be considered as an alternative to diverting colostomy in experienced centers. Given the poor prognosis of OCC and the high morbidity of emergency surgery - which may delay or even preclude adjuvant chemotherapy - novel treatment strategies are warranted. These include the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the interval between creation of a diverting stoma (ileostomy or colostomy) or colonic stent placement and subsequent elective colectomy, regardless of the primary tumor location.</p>","PeriodicalId":49271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstructed colon cancer: Review and perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Antoine Cazelles, Gaetan Pasinato, Mathilde Aubert, Gilles Manceau, Diane Mege, Charles Sabbagh, Mehdi Karoui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2025.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obstructed colon cancer (OCC) accounts for approximately 25% of colorectal cancer at the time of diagnosis and represents a surgical emergency creating a dual challenge: (i) the management of an acute mechanical colonic obstruction with potentially life-threatening consequences (fluid and electrolyte disturbances, systemic deterioration, colonic ischemia, stercoral stasis); and (ii) the treatment of an advanced primary or metastatic malignancy, often in elderly or frail patients with significant comorbidities. For right-sided OCC, right hemicolectomy with or without ileocolic anastomosis is the recommended approach, while a primary diverting ileostomy as a bridge to delayed right colectomy may be considered a safe alternative. For left-sided OCC, a diverting colostomy allows for subsequent oncological colectomy following complete disease staging and patient optimization. Hartmann's procedure should be reserved for perforated OCC, whereas (sub)total colectomy is indicated in cases of proximal colonic ischemia. In the setting of ischemia or perforation of a markedly distended proximal colon, a bowel-preserving (or colonic-sparing) strategy consisting of ileocecal resection with ileocolostomy - temporarily leaving the primary tumor in situ - may represent an alternative to (sub)total colectomy. Colonic stenting can be considered as an alternative to diverting colostomy in experienced centers. Given the poor prognosis of OCC and the high morbidity of emergency surgery - which may delay or even preclude adjuvant chemotherapy - novel treatment strategies are warranted. These include the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the interval between creation of a diverting stoma (ileostomy or colostomy) or colonic stent placement and subsequent elective colectomy, regardless of the primary tumor location.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Visceral Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Visceral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2025.09.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2025.09.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

梗阻性结肠癌(OCC)在诊断时约占结直肠癌的25%,是一种外科急诊,造成双重挑战:(i)管理具有潜在危及生命后果的急性机械性结肠梗阻(液体和电解质紊乱、全身恶化、结肠缺血、后珊瑚停滞);(ii)晚期原发性或转移性恶性肿瘤的治疗,通常用于有明显合并症的老年或体弱患者。对于右侧OCC,建议采用或不采用回肠结肠吻合术的右侧半结肠切除术,而原发性转移回肠造口作为延迟右侧结肠切除术的桥梁可能被认为是一种安全的选择。对于左侧OCC,转移结肠造口术允许在完成疾病分期和患者优化后进行后续肿瘤结肠切除术。Hartmann手术应保留用于穿孔OCC,而(亚)全结肠切除术适用于近端结肠缺血的病例。在明显膨胀的近端结肠缺血或穿孔的情况下,保留肠道(或保留结肠)的策略包括回盲切除术和回肠结肠造口术——暂时将原发肿瘤留在原位——可能是(亚)全结肠切除术的替代方案。在经验丰富的中心,结肠支架植入术可以作为转移结肠造口术的替代方法。鉴于OCC的预后不良和急诊手术的高发病率——这可能会延迟甚至阻止辅助化疗——新的治疗策略是必要的。这些包括在建立转移造口(回肠造口或结肠造口)或结肠支架置入和随后的选择性结肠切除术之间的间隔期间使用新辅助化疗,而不管原发肿瘤的位置如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstructed colon cancer: Review and perspectives.

Obstructed colon cancer (OCC) accounts for approximately 25% of colorectal cancer at the time of diagnosis and represents a surgical emergency creating a dual challenge: (i) the management of an acute mechanical colonic obstruction with potentially life-threatening consequences (fluid and electrolyte disturbances, systemic deterioration, colonic ischemia, stercoral stasis); and (ii) the treatment of an advanced primary or metastatic malignancy, often in elderly or frail patients with significant comorbidities. For right-sided OCC, right hemicolectomy with or without ileocolic anastomosis is the recommended approach, while a primary diverting ileostomy as a bridge to delayed right colectomy may be considered a safe alternative. For left-sided OCC, a diverting colostomy allows for subsequent oncological colectomy following complete disease staging and patient optimization. Hartmann's procedure should be reserved for perforated OCC, whereas (sub)total colectomy is indicated in cases of proximal colonic ischemia. In the setting of ischemia or perforation of a markedly distended proximal colon, a bowel-preserving (or colonic-sparing) strategy consisting of ileocecal resection with ileocolostomy - temporarily leaving the primary tumor in situ - may represent an alternative to (sub)total colectomy. Colonic stenting can be considered as an alternative to diverting colostomy in experienced centers. Given the poor prognosis of OCC and the high morbidity of emergency surgery - which may delay or even preclude adjuvant chemotherapy - novel treatment strategies are warranted. These include the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the interval between creation of a diverting stoma (ileostomy or colostomy) or colonic stent placement and subsequent elective colectomy, regardless of the primary tumor location.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visceral Surgery (JVS) is the online-only, English version of the French Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale. The journal focuses on clinical research and continuing education, and publishes original and review articles related to general surgery, as well as press reviews of recently published major international works. High-quality illustrations of surgical techniques, images and videos serve as support for clinical evaluation and practice optimization. JVS is indexed in the main international databases (including Medline) and is accessible worldwide through ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信