TikTok和Bilibili短视频平台放疗健康信息质量评价横断面研究

IF 2.7 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI:10.2196/73455
Feihang Guo, Guangcheng Ding, Yanzheng Zhang, Xinru Liu
{"title":"TikTok和Bilibili短视频平台放疗健康信息质量评价横断面研究","authors":"Feihang Guo, Guangcheng Ding, Yanzheng Zhang, Xinru Liu","doi":"10.2196/73455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiotherapy (RT) is a crucial modality in cancer treatment. In recent years, the rise of short-form video platforms has transformed how the public accesses medical information. TikTok and Bilibili, as leading short-video platforms, have emerged as significant channels for disseminating health information. However, there is an urgent need to evaluate the quality and reliability of the information related to RT available on these platforms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to systematically assess the information quality and reliability of RT-related short-form videos on TikTok and Bilibili platforms using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and a modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) evaluation tool, thereby elucidating the current landscape and challenges of digital health communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study systematically retrieved the top 100 RT-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili as of February 25, 2025. The quality of the videos was assessed using the GQS (1-5 points) and an mDISCERN scoring system (1-5 points). Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, as well as Spearman and Pearson correlation analyses, to ensure the reliability and validity of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 short-form videos related to RT were analyzed, revealing that the overall quality of videos on TikTok and Bilibili is unsatisfactory. Specifically, the median GQS for TikTok was 4 (IQR 3-4), while for Bilibili, it was 3 (IQR 3-4). The median mDISCERN scores for both platforms were 3 (IQR 2-4 and 3-4, respectively), and no significant differences were observed between the 2 platforms regarding the GQS (P=.12) and mDISCERN score (P=.10). On TikTok, 53% (53/100) of videos had a GQS of 4 or higher (\"good\" quality or better). On Bilibili, 45% (45/100) of videos had an mDISCERN score of 4 or higher, indicating \"relatively reliable\" quality. Videos produced by professionals, institutions, and nonprofessional institutions had significantly higher mDISCERN scores than those made by patients, with statistical significance (P<.001, P<.001, and P<.01, respectively). Furthermore, the correlations between the number of bookmarks and video duration, with mDISCERN scores, were 0.172 (P=.02) and 0.192 (P=.007), respectively. However, no video variables were found to predict the overall quality and reliability of the videos effectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that the overall quality of RT-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili is generally low. However, videos uploaded by professionals demonstrate higher information quality and reliability, providing valuable support for patients seeking guidance on health care management and treatment options for cancers. Therefore, improving the quality and reliability of video content, particularly that produced by patients, is crucial for ensuring that the public has access to accurate medical information.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"11 ","pages":"e73455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Assessment of Radiotherapy Health Information on Short-Form Video Platforms of TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Feihang Guo, Guangcheng Ding, Yanzheng Zhang, Xinru Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/73455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiotherapy (RT) is a crucial modality in cancer treatment. In recent years, the rise of short-form video platforms has transformed how the public accesses medical information. TikTok and Bilibili, as leading short-video platforms, have emerged as significant channels for disseminating health information. However, there is an urgent need to evaluate the quality and reliability of the information related to RT available on these platforms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to systematically assess the information quality and reliability of RT-related short-form videos on TikTok and Bilibili platforms using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and a modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) evaluation tool, thereby elucidating the current landscape and challenges of digital health communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study systematically retrieved the top 100 RT-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili as of February 25, 2025. The quality of the videos was assessed using the GQS (1-5 points) and an mDISCERN scoring system (1-5 points). Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, as well as Spearman and Pearson correlation analyses, to ensure the reliability and validity of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 short-form videos related to RT were analyzed, revealing that the overall quality of videos on TikTok and Bilibili is unsatisfactory. Specifically, the median GQS for TikTok was 4 (IQR 3-4), while for Bilibili, it was 3 (IQR 3-4). The median mDISCERN scores for both platforms were 3 (IQR 2-4 and 3-4, respectively), and no significant differences were observed between the 2 platforms regarding the GQS (P=.12) and mDISCERN score (P=.10). On TikTok, 53% (53/100) of videos had a GQS of 4 or higher (\\\"good\\\" quality or better). On Bilibili, 45% (45/100) of videos had an mDISCERN score of 4 or higher, indicating \\\"relatively reliable\\\" quality. Videos produced by professionals, institutions, and nonprofessional institutions had significantly higher mDISCERN scores than those made by patients, with statistical significance (P<.001, P<.001, and P<.01, respectively). Furthermore, the correlations between the number of bookmarks and video duration, with mDISCERN scores, were 0.172 (P=.02) and 0.192 (P=.007), respectively. However, no video variables were found to predict the overall quality and reliability of the videos effectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that the overall quality of RT-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili is generally low. However, videos uploaded by professionals demonstrate higher information quality and reliability, providing valuable support for patients seeking guidance on health care management and treatment options for cancers. Therefore, improving the quality and reliability of video content, particularly that produced by patients, is crucial for ensuring that the public has access to accurate medical information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Cancer\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e73455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456845/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/73455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/73455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:放射治疗(RT)是癌症治疗的一种重要方式。近年来,短视频平台的兴起改变了公众获取医疗信息的方式。抖音和哔哩哔哩作为领先的短视频平台,已经成为传播健康信息的重要渠道。然而,迫切需要评估这些平台上与RT相关的信息的质量和可靠性。目的:本研究旨在利用全球质量评分(GQS)和改进的DISCERN (mDISCERN)评估工具,系统评估TikTok和Bilibili平台上rt相关短视频的信息质量和可靠性,从而阐明数字健康传播的现状和挑战。方法:系统检索截至2025年2月25日,TikTok和Bilibili上排名前100位的rt相关视频。视频质量采用GQS(1-5分)和mDISCERN评分系统(1-5分)进行评估。统计分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验,Spearman和Pearson相关分析,确保结果的信度和效度。结果:对200个RT相关短视频进行分析,发现TikTok和Bilibili上的视频整体质量不理想。具体来说,TikTok的GQS中值为4 (IQR 3-4),而Bilibili的GQS中值为3 (IQR 3-4)。两种平台的mDISCERN得分中位数分别为3 (IQR为2-4和3-4),在GQS (P= 0.12)和mDISCERN得分(P= 0.10)方面,两种平台之间无显著差异。在TikTok上,53%(53/100)的视频的GQS为4或更高(“好”或更好)。在Bilibili上,45%(45/100)的视频的mDISCERN评分为4分或更高,表明质量“相对可靠”。专业、机构和非专业机构制作的视频的mDISCERN得分明显高于患者制作的视频,差异有统计学意义(p)结论:本研究揭示了TikTok和Bilibili上rt相关视频的整体质量普遍较低。然而,专业人员上传的视频显示了更高的信息质量和可靠性,为寻求医疗保健管理和癌症治疗方案指导的患者提供了宝贵的支持。因此,提高视频内容的质量和可靠性,特别是提高由患者制作的视频内容的质量和可靠性,对于确保公众获得准确的医疗信息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Assessment of Radiotherapy Health Information on Short-Form Video Platforms of TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is a crucial modality in cancer treatment. In recent years, the rise of short-form video platforms has transformed how the public accesses medical information. TikTok and Bilibili, as leading short-video platforms, have emerged as significant channels for disseminating health information. However, there is an urgent need to evaluate the quality and reliability of the information related to RT available on these platforms.

Objective: This study aims to systematically assess the information quality and reliability of RT-related short-form videos on TikTok and Bilibili platforms using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and a modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) evaluation tool, thereby elucidating the current landscape and challenges of digital health communication.

Methods: This study systematically retrieved the top 100 RT-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili as of February 25, 2025. The quality of the videos was assessed using the GQS (1-5 points) and an mDISCERN scoring system (1-5 points). Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, as well as Spearman and Pearson correlation analyses, to ensure the reliability and validity of the results.

Results: A total of 200 short-form videos related to RT were analyzed, revealing that the overall quality of videos on TikTok and Bilibili is unsatisfactory. Specifically, the median GQS for TikTok was 4 (IQR 3-4), while for Bilibili, it was 3 (IQR 3-4). The median mDISCERN scores for both platforms were 3 (IQR 2-4 and 3-4, respectively), and no significant differences were observed between the 2 platforms regarding the GQS (P=.12) and mDISCERN score (P=.10). On TikTok, 53% (53/100) of videos had a GQS of 4 or higher ("good" quality or better). On Bilibili, 45% (45/100) of videos had an mDISCERN score of 4 or higher, indicating "relatively reliable" quality. Videos produced by professionals, institutions, and nonprofessional institutions had significantly higher mDISCERN scores than those made by patients, with statistical significance (P<.001, P<.001, and P<.01, respectively). Furthermore, the correlations between the number of bookmarks and video duration, with mDISCERN scores, were 0.172 (P=.02) and 0.192 (P=.007), respectively. However, no video variables were found to predict the overall quality and reliability of the videos effectively.

Conclusions: This study revealed that the overall quality of RT-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili is generally low. However, videos uploaded by professionals demonstrate higher information quality and reliability, providing valuable support for patients seeking guidance on health care management and treatment options for cancers. Therefore, improving the quality and reliability of video content, particularly that produced by patients, is crucial for ensuring that the public has access to accurate medical information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信