轻度缺血性卒中或短暂性缺血性发作后72小时内双抗血小板与单抗血小板治疗:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

IF 4.9 1区 医学
Yingying Yang, Jinghan Zhu, Ying Gao, Yuesong Pan, Yilong Wang
{"title":"轻度缺血性卒中或短暂性缺血性发作后72小时内双抗血小板与单抗血小板治疗:随机对照试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Yingying Yang, Jinghan Zhu, Ying Gao, Yuesong Pan, Yilong Wang","doi":"10.1136/svn-2025-004143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although previous evidence generally agreed on the short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for mild stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), there is no consensus on the optimal threshold for stroke severity and initiation timing of DAPT. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to evaluate early DAPT versus single therapy in mild stroke or TIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed double-blind and randomised controlled trials up to October 2024 evaluating DAPT versus monotherapy for acute mild, non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; NIHSS≤5) or TIA within 72 hours of ictus. Random effects models generated risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs for outcomes including stroke, composite vascular events, ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, haemorrhagic stroke and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pooled data from five trials (n=27 559) demonstrated that DAPT versus monotherapy lowered the risk of stroke recurrence (RR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.83), composite vascular events (RR, 0.75; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.83) and ischaemic stroke (RR, 0.74; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.81). However, DAPT increased the risk of major bleeding (RR, 2.19; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.49) and haemorrhagic stroke (RR, 2.08; 95% CI 1.13 to 3.82), with no significant increase in the risk of all-cause mortality (RR, 1.28; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For acute mild stroke (NIHSS ≤5) or patients with TIA within 72 hours of ictus, early DAPT initiation demonstrates net clinical benefit through reducing ischaemic events, despite an increase in bleeding complications, without affecting mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":48733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual versus mono antiplatelet therapy within 72 hours after onset for mild ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Yingying Yang, Jinghan Zhu, Ying Gao, Yuesong Pan, Yilong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/svn-2025-004143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although previous evidence generally agreed on the short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for mild stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), there is no consensus on the optimal threshold for stroke severity and initiation timing of DAPT. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to evaluate early DAPT versus single therapy in mild stroke or TIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed double-blind and randomised controlled trials up to October 2024 evaluating DAPT versus monotherapy for acute mild, non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; NIHSS≤5) or TIA within 72 hours of ictus. Random effects models generated risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs for outcomes including stroke, composite vascular events, ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, haemorrhagic stroke and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pooled data from five trials (n=27 559) demonstrated that DAPT versus monotherapy lowered the risk of stroke recurrence (RR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.83), composite vascular events (RR, 0.75; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.83) and ischaemic stroke (RR, 0.74; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.81). However, DAPT increased the risk of major bleeding (RR, 2.19; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.49) and haemorrhagic stroke (RR, 2.08; 95% CI 1.13 to 3.82), with no significant increase in the risk of all-cause mortality (RR, 1.28; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For acute mild stroke (NIHSS ≤5) or patients with TIA within 72 hours of ictus, early DAPT initiation demonstrates net clinical benefit through reducing ischaemic events, despite an increase in bleeding complications, without affecting mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2025-004143\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2025-004143","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然先前的证据普遍同意短期双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)治疗轻度卒中或短暂性缺血发作(TIA),但对于卒中严重程度的最佳阈值和DAPT的起始时间尚未达成共识。我们进行了一项最新的随机对照试验荟萃分析,以评估轻度卒中或TIA的早期DAPT与单一治疗的对比。方法:我们系统地回顾了截至2024年10月的双盲和随机对照试验,评估了DAPT与单药治疗急性轻度、非心源性缺血性卒中(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表;NIHSS≤5)或发作后72小时内TIA的疗效。随机效应模型对卒中、复合血管事件、缺血性卒中、大出血、出血性卒中和全因死亡率等结局产生95% ci的风险比(RR)。结果:来自5项试验(n= 27559)的汇总数据表明,DAPT与单药治疗相比降低了卒中复发(RR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.70至0.83)、复合血管事件(RR, 0.75; 95% CI 0.68至0.83)和缺血性卒中(RR, 0.74; 95% CI 0.68至0.81)的风险。然而,DAPT增加了大出血(RR, 2.19; 95% CI 1.38 - 3.49)和出血性卒中(RR, 2.08; 95% CI 1.13 - 3.82)的风险,而全因死亡风险无显著增加(RR, 1.28; 95% CI 0.95 - 1.71)。结论:对于急性轻度卒中(NIHSS≤5)或发作后72小时内发生TIA的患者,尽管出血并发症增加,但早期DAPT启动通过减少缺血事件显示出净临床益处,而不影响死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual versus mono antiplatelet therapy within 72 hours after onset for mild ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Background: Although previous evidence generally agreed on the short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for mild stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), there is no consensus on the optimal threshold for stroke severity and initiation timing of DAPT. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to evaluate early DAPT versus single therapy in mild stroke or TIA.

Methods: We systematically reviewed double-blind and randomised controlled trials up to October 2024 evaluating DAPT versus monotherapy for acute mild, non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; NIHSS≤5) or TIA within 72 hours of ictus. Random effects models generated risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs for outcomes including stroke, composite vascular events, ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, haemorrhagic stroke and all-cause mortality.

Results: Pooled data from five trials (n=27 559) demonstrated that DAPT versus monotherapy lowered the risk of stroke recurrence (RR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.83), composite vascular events (RR, 0.75; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.83) and ischaemic stroke (RR, 0.74; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.81). However, DAPT increased the risk of major bleeding (RR, 2.19; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.49) and haemorrhagic stroke (RR, 2.08; 95% CI 1.13 to 3.82), with no significant increase in the risk of all-cause mortality (RR, 1.28; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.71).

Conclusions: For acute mild stroke (NIHSS ≤5) or patients with TIA within 72 hours of ictus, early DAPT initiation demonstrates net clinical benefit through reducing ischaemic events, despite an increase in bleeding complications, without affecting mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Journal of Investigative Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNALMEDICINE, RESE-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research. JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信