Martina Novia, Alberto Aiolfi, Francesco Cammarata, Gianluca Bonitta, Cristina Ogliari, Alessandro Giovanelli, Davide Bona, Luigi Bonavina
{"title":"磁括约肌增强术治疗袖胃切除术后胃食管反流:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Martina Novia, Alberto Aiolfi, Francesco Cammarata, Gianluca Bonitta, Cristina Ogliari, Alessandro Giovanelli, Davide Bona, Luigi Bonavina","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12238-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>De-novo reflux or worsening of pre-existing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presents a major challenge after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a viable treatment option, however, the procedure is complex and carries risks such as anastomotic leak and metabolic complications. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been introduced for the treatment of GERD in patients with normal anatomy, but clinical experience is still limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Assess the efficacy of MSA device as GERD remedial treatment after LSG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, single-arm, multi-center study from January 2020 to January 2024. Primary outcome was post-MSA patient-reported quality of life assessed with the GERD-HRQL questionnaire. Esophageal acid exposure, endoscopic, high-resolution manometric findings, and PPI use were secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve subjects (75% females) underwent MSA for pathologic GERD after LSG. Mean baseline BMI was 28.6 ± 4.3. All procedures included hiatoplasty and were completed laparoscopically. Mean operative time was 78.5 min. No intraoperative or perioperative short-term complications occurred. Overall, 11 patients completed the 12-month follow-up with clinical and instrumental assessment. GERD-HRQL scores (38.6 vs. 10.1; p = 0.003) and daily PPI use (100% vs. 27.3%; p = 0.003) significantly improved compared to baseline. Notably, %Acid Exposure Time (AET) (14.1 vs. 7.1; p = 0.06), DeMeester score (60.7 vs. 20.5; p = 0.017), total number of reflux episodes (110 vs. 40; p = 0.012), number of re-reflux (142 vs. 63; p = 0.016), distal contractile integral (DCI) (mmHg-s-cm) (728 vs. 2040; p = 0.043), and LES basal pressure (mmHg) (7.3 vs. 26.1; p = 0.028) were improved compared to baseline. No device adverse events nor explants occurred during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that MSA seems to improve GERD-related symptoms and patient quality of life in patients with pathological GERD after LSG. At a mean follow-up of 22 months, PPI use, AET%, DeMeester score, total number of reflux episodes, DCI, and LES basal pressure seem to be improved compared to baseline.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Martina Novia, Alberto Aiolfi, Francesco Cammarata, Gianluca Bonitta, Cristina Ogliari, Alessandro Giovanelli, Davide Bona, Luigi Bonavina\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-12238-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>De-novo reflux or worsening of pre-existing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presents a major challenge after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a viable treatment option, however, the procedure is complex and carries risks such as anastomotic leak and metabolic complications. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been introduced for the treatment of GERD in patients with normal anatomy, but clinical experience is still limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Assess the efficacy of MSA device as GERD remedial treatment after LSG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, single-arm, multi-center study from January 2020 to January 2024. Primary outcome was post-MSA patient-reported quality of life assessed with the GERD-HRQL questionnaire. Esophageal acid exposure, endoscopic, high-resolution manometric findings, and PPI use were secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve subjects (75% females) underwent MSA for pathologic GERD after LSG. Mean baseline BMI was 28.6 ± 4.3. All procedures included hiatoplasty and were completed laparoscopically. Mean operative time was 78.5 min. No intraoperative or perioperative short-term complications occurred. Overall, 11 patients completed the 12-month follow-up with clinical and instrumental assessment. GERD-HRQL scores (38.6 vs. 10.1; p = 0.003) and daily PPI use (100% vs. 27.3%; p = 0.003) significantly improved compared to baseline. Notably, %Acid Exposure Time (AET) (14.1 vs. 7.1; p = 0.06), DeMeester score (60.7 vs. 20.5; p = 0.017), total number of reflux episodes (110 vs. 40; p = 0.012), number of re-reflux (142 vs. 63; p = 0.016), distal contractile integral (DCI) (mmHg-s-cm) (728 vs. 2040; p = 0.043), and LES basal pressure (mmHg) (7.3 vs. 26.1; p = 0.028) were improved compared to baseline. No device adverse events nor explants occurred during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that MSA seems to improve GERD-related symptoms and patient quality of life in patients with pathological GERD after LSG. At a mean follow-up of 22 months, PPI use, AET%, DeMeester score, total number of reflux episodes, DCI, and LES basal pressure seem to be improved compared to baseline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12238-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12238-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胃食管反流病(GERD)复发或恶化是腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)后面临的主要挑战。Roux-en-Y胃旁路术是一种可行的治疗选择,然而,手术过程复杂,存在吻合口漏和代谢并发症等风险。磁括约肌增强术(MSA)已被引入治疗胃食管反流患者的正常解剖,但临床经验仍然有限。目的:评价MSA装置治疗LSG术后胃食管反流的疗效。方法:2020年1月至2024年1月进行前瞻性、单臂、多中心研究。主要结局是用GERD-HRQL问卷评估msa后患者报告的生活质量。食管酸暴露、内窥镜、高分辨率测压结果和PPI使用是次要结果。结果:12例患者(75%为女性)在LSG术后接受了MSA治疗病理性胃食管反流。平均基线BMI为28.6±4.3。所有手术包括裂孔成形术并在腹腔镜下完成。平均手术时间78.5 min。术中、围术期无短期并发症发生。总体而言,11例患者完成了为期12个月的临床和仪器评估随访。与基线相比,GERD-HRQL评分(38.6比10.1;p = 0.003)和每日PPI使用(100%比27.3%;p = 0.003)显著改善。值得注意的是,与基线相比,酸暴露时间% (AET) (14.1 vs. 7.1; p = 0.06)、DeMeester评分(60.7 vs. 20.5; p = 0.017)、反流总发作次数(110 vs. 40; p = 0.012)、再反流次数(142 vs. 63; p = 0.016)、远端收缩积分(DCI) (mmHg-s-cm) (728 vs. 2040; p = 0.043)和LES基础压(mmHg) (7.3 vs. 26.1; p = 0.028)均有改善。随访期间未发生器械不良事件和外植体。结论:本研究表明,MSA似乎可以改善LSG后病理性GERD患者的GERD相关症状和患者的生活质量。在平均22个月的随访中,与基线相比,PPI使用、AET%、DeMeester评分、反流总次数、DCI和LES基础压似乎有所改善。
Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study.
Background: De-novo reflux or worsening of pre-existing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presents a major challenge after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a viable treatment option, however, the procedure is complex and carries risks such as anastomotic leak and metabolic complications. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been introduced for the treatment of GERD in patients with normal anatomy, but clinical experience is still limited.
Aim: Assess the efficacy of MSA device as GERD remedial treatment after LSG.
Methods: Prospective, single-arm, multi-center study from January 2020 to January 2024. Primary outcome was post-MSA patient-reported quality of life assessed with the GERD-HRQL questionnaire. Esophageal acid exposure, endoscopic, high-resolution manometric findings, and PPI use were secondary outcomes.
Results: Twelve subjects (75% females) underwent MSA for pathologic GERD after LSG. Mean baseline BMI was 28.6 ± 4.3. All procedures included hiatoplasty and were completed laparoscopically. Mean operative time was 78.5 min. No intraoperative or perioperative short-term complications occurred. Overall, 11 patients completed the 12-month follow-up with clinical and instrumental assessment. GERD-HRQL scores (38.6 vs. 10.1; p = 0.003) and daily PPI use (100% vs. 27.3%; p = 0.003) significantly improved compared to baseline. Notably, %Acid Exposure Time (AET) (14.1 vs. 7.1; p = 0.06), DeMeester score (60.7 vs. 20.5; p = 0.017), total number of reflux episodes (110 vs. 40; p = 0.012), number of re-reflux (142 vs. 63; p = 0.016), distal contractile integral (DCI) (mmHg-s-cm) (728 vs. 2040; p = 0.043), and LES basal pressure (mmHg) (7.3 vs. 26.1; p = 0.028) were improved compared to baseline. No device adverse events nor explants occurred during follow-up.
Conclusions: This study shows that MSA seems to improve GERD-related symptoms and patient quality of life in patients with pathological GERD after LSG. At a mean follow-up of 22 months, PPI use, AET%, DeMeester score, total number of reflux episodes, DCI, and LES basal pressure seem to be improved compared to baseline.
期刊介绍:
Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research.
Topics covered in the journal include:
-Surgical aspects of:
Interventional endoscopy,
Ultrasound,
Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology,
-Gastroenterologic surgery
-Thoracic surgery
-Traumatic surgery
-Orthopedic surgery
-Pediatric surgery