Abubakar I Sidik, Sandro Lepidi, Kow Entsua-Mensah, Vladislav V Dontsov, Giovanni Badalamenti, Mario D'Oria
{"title":"主动脉疾病治疗已发表研究的全球趋势:二十年文献计量分析(1994-2024)。","authors":"Abubakar I Sidik, Sandro Lepidi, Kow Entsua-Mensah, Vladislav V Dontsov, Giovanni Badalamenti, Mario D'Oria","doi":"10.1177/17085381251379114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAortic diseases, including aneurysms and dissections, represent a significant global health burden, necessitating advancements in surgical and endovascular interventions. This bibliometric analysis examines the evolution of research trends, key contributors, and emerging themes in the treatment of aortic diseases over the past three decades.MethodsBibliometric data from Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed for peer-reviewed articles published between 1994 and 2024. A systematic approach adhering to the PRISMA 2020 framework identified 2985 articles. Descriptive and advanced bibliometric techniques, including citation, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrence analyses, were employed using tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny.ResultsThe annual scientific output demonstrated consistent growth, with significant contributions from the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany. Leading institutions, including Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, played pivotal roles in advancing research. Keywords revealed a dual focus on minimally invasive techniques, such as EVAR and TEVAR, and patient-centered outcomes like quality of life and survival. Collaboration networks and citation analyses highlighted influential authors and foundational studies shaping the field.ConclusionsThe study underscores the importance of global collaboration and technological innovation in advancing aortic disease treatment. While disparities in research representation persist, emerging trends in hybrid approaches, multidisciplinary methods, and outcome-based studies offer promising directions for future research. These findings provide a comprehensive resource for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers seeking to address challenges and improve patient care in this critical field.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381251379114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global trends in published research of aortic disease treatment: A two-decade bibliometric analysis (1994-2024).\",\"authors\":\"Abubakar I Sidik, Sandro Lepidi, Kow Entsua-Mensah, Vladislav V Dontsov, Giovanni Badalamenti, Mario D'Oria\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17085381251379114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAortic diseases, including aneurysms and dissections, represent a significant global health burden, necessitating advancements in surgical and endovascular interventions. This bibliometric analysis examines the evolution of research trends, key contributors, and emerging themes in the treatment of aortic diseases over the past three decades.MethodsBibliometric data from Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed for peer-reviewed articles published between 1994 and 2024. A systematic approach adhering to the PRISMA 2020 framework identified 2985 articles. Descriptive and advanced bibliometric techniques, including citation, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrence analyses, were employed using tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny.ResultsThe annual scientific output demonstrated consistent growth, with significant contributions from the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany. Leading institutions, including Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, played pivotal roles in advancing research. Keywords revealed a dual focus on minimally invasive techniques, such as EVAR and TEVAR, and patient-centered outcomes like quality of life and survival. Collaboration networks and citation analyses highlighted influential authors and foundational studies shaping the field.ConclusionsThe study underscores the importance of global collaboration and technological innovation in advancing aortic disease treatment. While disparities in research representation persist, emerging trends in hybrid approaches, multidisciplinary methods, and outcome-based studies offer promising directions for future research. These findings provide a comprehensive resource for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers seeking to address challenges and improve patient care in this critical field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17085381251379114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251379114\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251379114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Global trends in published research of aortic disease treatment: A two-decade bibliometric analysis (1994-2024).
BackgroundAortic diseases, including aneurysms and dissections, represent a significant global health burden, necessitating advancements in surgical and endovascular interventions. This bibliometric analysis examines the evolution of research trends, key contributors, and emerging themes in the treatment of aortic diseases over the past three decades.MethodsBibliometric data from Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed for peer-reviewed articles published between 1994 and 2024. A systematic approach adhering to the PRISMA 2020 framework identified 2985 articles. Descriptive and advanced bibliometric techniques, including citation, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrence analyses, were employed using tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny.ResultsThe annual scientific output demonstrated consistent growth, with significant contributions from the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany. Leading institutions, including Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, played pivotal roles in advancing research. Keywords revealed a dual focus on minimally invasive techniques, such as EVAR and TEVAR, and patient-centered outcomes like quality of life and survival. Collaboration networks and citation analyses highlighted influential authors and foundational studies shaping the field.ConclusionsThe study underscores the importance of global collaboration and technological innovation in advancing aortic disease treatment. While disparities in research representation persist, emerging trends in hybrid approaches, multidisciplinary methods, and outcome-based studies offer promising directions for future research. These findings provide a comprehensive resource for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers seeking to address challenges and improve patient care in this critical field.
期刊介绍:
Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.