主动脉疾病治疗已发表研究的全球趋势:二十年文献计量分析(1994-2024)。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI:10.1177/17085381251379114
Abubakar I Sidik, Sandro Lepidi, Kow Entsua-Mensah, Vladislav V Dontsov, Giovanni Badalamenti, Mario D'Oria
{"title":"主动脉疾病治疗已发表研究的全球趋势:二十年文献计量分析(1994-2024)。","authors":"Abubakar I Sidik, Sandro Lepidi, Kow Entsua-Mensah, Vladislav V Dontsov, Giovanni Badalamenti, Mario D'Oria","doi":"10.1177/17085381251379114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAortic diseases, including aneurysms and dissections, represent a significant global health burden, necessitating advancements in surgical and endovascular interventions. This bibliometric analysis examines the evolution of research trends, key contributors, and emerging themes in the treatment of aortic diseases over the past three decades.MethodsBibliometric data from Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed for peer-reviewed articles published between 1994 and 2024. A systematic approach adhering to the PRISMA 2020 framework identified 2985 articles. Descriptive and advanced bibliometric techniques, including citation, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrence analyses, were employed using tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny.ResultsThe annual scientific output demonstrated consistent growth, with significant contributions from the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany. Leading institutions, including Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, played pivotal roles in advancing research. Keywords revealed a dual focus on minimally invasive techniques, such as EVAR and TEVAR, and patient-centered outcomes like quality of life and survival. Collaboration networks and citation analyses highlighted influential authors and foundational studies shaping the field.ConclusionsThe study underscores the importance of global collaboration and technological innovation in advancing aortic disease treatment. While disparities in research representation persist, emerging trends in hybrid approaches, multidisciplinary methods, and outcome-based studies offer promising directions for future research. These findings provide a comprehensive resource for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers seeking to address challenges and improve patient care in this critical field.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381251379114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global trends in published research of aortic disease treatment: A two-decade bibliometric analysis (1994-2024).\",\"authors\":\"Abubakar I Sidik, Sandro Lepidi, Kow Entsua-Mensah, Vladislav V Dontsov, Giovanni Badalamenti, Mario D'Oria\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17085381251379114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAortic diseases, including aneurysms and dissections, represent a significant global health burden, necessitating advancements in surgical and endovascular interventions. This bibliometric analysis examines the evolution of research trends, key contributors, and emerging themes in the treatment of aortic diseases over the past three decades.MethodsBibliometric data from Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed for peer-reviewed articles published between 1994 and 2024. A systematic approach adhering to the PRISMA 2020 framework identified 2985 articles. Descriptive and advanced bibliometric techniques, including citation, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrence analyses, were employed using tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny.ResultsThe annual scientific output demonstrated consistent growth, with significant contributions from the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany. Leading institutions, including Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, played pivotal roles in advancing research. Keywords revealed a dual focus on minimally invasive techniques, such as EVAR and TEVAR, and patient-centered outcomes like quality of life and survival. Collaboration networks and citation analyses highlighted influential authors and foundational studies shaping the field.ConclusionsThe study underscores the importance of global collaboration and technological innovation in advancing aortic disease treatment. While disparities in research representation persist, emerging trends in hybrid approaches, multidisciplinary methods, and outcome-based studies offer promising directions for future research. These findings provide a comprehensive resource for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers seeking to address challenges and improve patient care in this critical field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17085381251379114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251379114\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251379114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动脉疾病,包括动脉瘤和夹层,是一个重大的全球健康负担,需要在手术和血管内干预方面取得进展。本文献计量学分析考察了过去三十年来主动脉疾病治疗的研究趋势、主要贡献者和新兴主题的演变。方法对1994 ~ 2024年间发表的经同行评议的论文进行文献计量学分析。遵循PRISMA 2020框架的系统方法确定了2985篇文章。使用VOSviewer和Biblioshiny等工具,采用了描述性和高级文献计量技术,包括引文、合著者和关键词共现分析。结果年度科研产出持续增长,其中美国、英国和德国贡献显著。包括哈佛医学院和贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心在内的领先机构在推进研究方面发挥了关键作用。关键词揭示了对微创技术的双重关注,如EVAR和TEVAR,以及以患者为中心的结局,如生活质量和生存。合作网络和引文分析突出了影响该领域的有影响力的作者和基础研究。结论该研究强调了全球合作和技术创新对推进主动脉疾病治疗的重要性。虽然研究代表性的差异仍然存在,但混合方法、多学科方法和基于结果的研究的新趋势为未来的研究提供了有希望的方向。这些发现为临床医生、研究人员和政策制定者提供了全面的资源,以应对这一关键领域的挑战并改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global trends in published research of aortic disease treatment: A two-decade bibliometric analysis (1994-2024).

BackgroundAortic diseases, including aneurysms and dissections, represent a significant global health burden, necessitating advancements in surgical and endovascular interventions. This bibliometric analysis examines the evolution of research trends, key contributors, and emerging themes in the treatment of aortic diseases over the past three decades.MethodsBibliometric data from Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed for peer-reviewed articles published between 1994 and 2024. A systematic approach adhering to the PRISMA 2020 framework identified 2985 articles. Descriptive and advanced bibliometric techniques, including citation, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrence analyses, were employed using tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny.ResultsThe annual scientific output demonstrated consistent growth, with significant contributions from the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany. Leading institutions, including Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, played pivotal roles in advancing research. Keywords revealed a dual focus on minimally invasive techniques, such as EVAR and TEVAR, and patient-centered outcomes like quality of life and survival. Collaboration networks and citation analyses highlighted influential authors and foundational studies shaping the field.ConclusionsThe study underscores the importance of global collaboration and technological innovation in advancing aortic disease treatment. While disparities in research representation persist, emerging trends in hybrid approaches, multidisciplinary methods, and outcome-based studies offer promising directions for future research. These findings provide a comprehensive resource for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers seeking to address challenges and improve patient care in this critical field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信