设计具有基线测量结果的楔形阶梯群随机试验。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Kendra Davis-Plourde, Keith Goldfeld, Heather Allore, Monica Taljaard, Fan Li
{"title":"设计具有基线测量结果的楔形阶梯群随机试验。","authors":"Kendra Davis-Plourde, Keith Goldfeld, Heather Allore, Monica Taljaard, Fan Li","doi":"10.1002/sim.70273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) are a type of uni-directional crossover designs and are increasingly common in prevention and implementation research. Although sample size formulas have been developed to support the planning of SW-CRTs, almost no prior methods incorporated the baseline measurement of the outcome-a common feature in many randomized trials and, increasingly, in cross-sectional SW-CRTs. In this article, we systematically investigate the possibility of addressing a baseline outcome measurement in designing cross-sectional SW-CRTs. We provide three linear mixed modeling approaches to adjust for the baseline outcome and derive the corresponding variance formula of the treatment effect estimator under each. The derived formulas reveal the efficiency implications of including a baseline outcome measurement, and provide a natural vehicle for the efficiency comparisons across adjustment approaches to generate practical recommendations. We validate the power and sample size methods under each baseline adjustment approach using simulations and provide an illustrative sample size calculation with a baseline outcome using the context of a real SW-CRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 20-22","pages":"e70273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials With a Baseline Measurement of the Outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Kendra Davis-Plourde, Keith Goldfeld, Heather Allore, Monica Taljaard, Fan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sim.70273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) are a type of uni-directional crossover designs and are increasingly common in prevention and implementation research. Although sample size formulas have been developed to support the planning of SW-CRTs, almost no prior methods incorporated the baseline measurement of the outcome-a common feature in many randomized trials and, increasingly, in cross-sectional SW-CRTs. In this article, we systematically investigate the possibility of addressing a baseline outcome measurement in designing cross-sectional SW-CRTs. We provide three linear mixed modeling approaches to adjust for the baseline outcome and derive the corresponding variance formula of the treatment effect estimator under each. The derived formulas reveal the efficiency implications of including a baseline outcome measurement, and provide a natural vehicle for the efficiency comparisons across adjustment approaches to generate practical recommendations. We validate the power and sample size methods under each baseline adjustment approach using simulations and provide an illustrative sample size calculation with a baseline outcome using the context of a real SW-CRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"44 20-22\",\"pages\":\"e70273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70273\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阶梯形聚类随机试验(sw - crt)是一种单向交叉设计,在预防和实施研究中越来越普遍。尽管已经开发了样本量公式来支持sw - crt的计划,但几乎没有先前的方法纳入结果的基线测量-这是许多随机试验和越来越多的横截面sw - crt的共同特征。在本文中,我们系统地研究了在设计横截面sw - crt时解决基线结果测量的可能性。我们提供了三种线性混合建模方法来调整基线结果,并推导出每种方法下治疗效果估计量的相应方差公式。推导出的公式揭示了包括基线结果测量的效率影响,并为各种调整方法之间的效率比较提供了自然的工具,以产生实际的建议。我们使用模拟验证了每种基线调整方法下的功率和样本量方法,并提供了一个说明性的样本量计算,并使用真实的SW-CRT背景下的基线结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials With a Baseline Measurement of the Outcome.

Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) are a type of uni-directional crossover designs and are increasingly common in prevention and implementation research. Although sample size formulas have been developed to support the planning of SW-CRTs, almost no prior methods incorporated the baseline measurement of the outcome-a common feature in many randomized trials and, increasingly, in cross-sectional SW-CRTs. In this article, we systematically investigate the possibility of addressing a baseline outcome measurement in designing cross-sectional SW-CRTs. We provide three linear mixed modeling approaches to adjust for the baseline outcome and derive the corresponding variance formula of the treatment effect estimator under each. The derived formulas reveal the efficiency implications of including a baseline outcome measurement, and provide a natural vehicle for the efficiency comparisons across adjustment approaches to generate practical recommendations. We validate the power and sample size methods under each baseline adjustment approach using simulations and provide an illustrative sample size calculation with a baseline outcome using the context of a real SW-CRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信