Debora Oliveira, Gabriel P A Costa, Rodrigo Fontenele, Mateo A Córdoba-Delgado, Melissa C Funaro, Claudia M Campbell, David A Fiellin, Gustavo A Angarita, Joao P De Aquino
{"title":"阿片类药物使用障碍患者在阿片类药物激动剂治疗后疼痛的定量感觉测试:范围综述。","authors":"Debora Oliveira, Gabriel P A Costa, Rodrigo Fontenele, Mateo A Córdoba-Delgado, Melissa C Funaro, Claudia M Campbell, David A Fiellin, Gustavo A Angarita, Joao P De Aquino","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the use of quantitative sensory testing (QST) in assessing pain responses and mechanisms among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Systematic literature search across five major databases.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Studies investigating QST outcomes in adults with OUD receiving OAT (methadone, buprenorphine, or other opioid agonists) with or without co-occurring chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception through March 2025. Eligible studies included original research employing QST methodologies in adults with OUD receiving OAT. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, QST methodologies, and pain-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 45 included studies, 64.4% employed cross-sectional designs with limited protocol standardization. Static QST measures predominated, with thermal stimuli most common. The most consistent finding was reduced cold pain tolerance in individuals with OUD compared to controls (60% of studies). Dynamic QST measures (3 studies) revealed altered pain modulation suggestive of central sensitization. Pain processing abnormalities frequently persisted despite prolonged abstinence from non-OAT opioids, suggesting lasting neuroadaptive changes. Methodological heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting of clinical variables limited synthesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QST demonstrates potential for enhancing clinical understanding of pain mechanisms in individuals receiving OAT. Future research should prioritize protocol standardization, longitudinal designs tracking pain sensitivity changes, and exploration of QST's predictive value for treatment responses to facilitate clinical integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Sensory Testing of Pain in Persons with Opioid Use Disorder on Opioid Agonist Treatment: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Debora Oliveira, Gabriel P A Costa, Rodrigo Fontenele, Mateo A Córdoba-Delgado, Melissa C Funaro, Claudia M Campbell, David A Fiellin, Gustavo A Angarita, Joao P De Aquino\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pm/pnaf132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the use of quantitative sensory testing (QST) in assessing pain responses and mechanisms among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Systematic literature search across five major databases.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Studies investigating QST outcomes in adults with OUD receiving OAT (methadone, buprenorphine, or other opioid agonists) with or without co-occurring chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception through March 2025. Eligible studies included original research employing QST methodologies in adults with OUD receiving OAT. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, QST methodologies, and pain-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 45 included studies, 64.4% employed cross-sectional designs with limited protocol standardization. Static QST measures predominated, with thermal stimuli most common. The most consistent finding was reduced cold pain tolerance in individuals with OUD compared to controls (60% of studies). Dynamic QST measures (3 studies) revealed altered pain modulation suggestive of central sensitization. Pain processing abnormalities frequently persisted despite prolonged abstinence from non-OAT opioids, suggesting lasting neuroadaptive changes. Methodological heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting of clinical variables limited synthesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QST demonstrates potential for enhancing clinical understanding of pain mechanisms in individuals receiving OAT. Future research should prioritize protocol standardization, longitudinal designs tracking pain sensitivity changes, and exploration of QST's predictive value for treatment responses to facilitate clinical integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf132\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价定量感觉测试(QST)在阿片样物质使用障碍(OUD)患者接受阿片样物质激动剂治疗(OAT)的疼痛反应及其机制中的应用。设计:根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查。设置:跨五大数据库进行系统文献检索。受试者:研究接受OAT(美沙酮、丁丙诺啡或其他阿片类激动剂)治疗伴有或不伴有慢性疼痛的成人OUD患者QST结果。方法:检索Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、APA PsycINFO、Cochrane Library和Web of Science,检索时间从创立到2025年3月。符合条件的研究包括在接受OAT治疗的成人OUD患者中采用QST方法的原始研究。数据提取侧重于研究特征、QST方法和疼痛相关结果。结果:在纳入的45项研究中,64.4%采用了有限的方案标准化的横断面设计。静态QST测量占主导地位,热刺激最常见。最一致的发现是,与对照组相比,OUD患者的冷痛耐受性降低(60%的研究)。动态QST测量(3项研究)揭示了中枢致敏的疼痛调节改变。尽管长期戒断非oat阿片类药物,但疼痛处理异常经常持续存在,表明持续的神经适应性改变。方法学的异质性和不一致的临床变量报告限制了综合。结论:QST显示了增强临床对OAT患者疼痛机制理解的潜力。未来的研究应优先考虑方案标准化,跟踪疼痛敏感性变化的纵向设计,以及探索QST对治疗反应的预测价值,以促进临床整合。
Quantitative Sensory Testing of Pain in Persons with Opioid Use Disorder on Opioid Agonist Treatment: A Scoping Review.
Objective: To evaluate the use of quantitative sensory testing (QST) in assessing pain responses and mechanisms among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT).
Design: Scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
Setting: Systematic literature search across five major databases.
Subjects: Studies investigating QST outcomes in adults with OUD receiving OAT (methadone, buprenorphine, or other opioid agonists) with or without co-occurring chronic pain.
Methods: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception through March 2025. Eligible studies included original research employing QST methodologies in adults with OUD receiving OAT. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, QST methodologies, and pain-related outcomes.
Results: Of 45 included studies, 64.4% employed cross-sectional designs with limited protocol standardization. Static QST measures predominated, with thermal stimuli most common. The most consistent finding was reduced cold pain tolerance in individuals with OUD compared to controls (60% of studies). Dynamic QST measures (3 studies) revealed altered pain modulation suggestive of central sensitization. Pain processing abnormalities frequently persisted despite prolonged abstinence from non-OAT opioids, suggesting lasting neuroadaptive changes. Methodological heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting of clinical variables limited synthesis.
Conclusions: QST demonstrates potential for enhancing clinical understanding of pain mechanisms in individuals receiving OAT. Future research should prioritize protocol standardization, longitudinal designs tracking pain sensitivity changes, and exploration of QST's predictive value for treatment responses to facilitate clinical integration.
期刊介绍:
Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.