{"title":"多重聚合酶链反应检测对菌血症患者的影响。","authors":"Daisuke Kitagawa, Taito Kitano, Takehito Kasamatsu, Naoyuki Shiraishi, Mai Yasuda, Mai Okada, Soma Suzuki, Madoka Sekine, Ryo Yamanishi, Ayu Mukai, Ritsuki Uejima, Yuki Suzuki, Akiyo Nakano, Ryuichi Nakano, Hisakazu Yano, Fumihiko Nakamura, Koichi Maeda","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.01980-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid identification of pathogens in bacteremia is critical for optimizing antimicrobial therapy. The FilmArray blood culture identification 2 (BCID2) panel enables multiplex PCR-based detection of pathogens and resistance genes. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of BCID2 implementation in hospitalized patients with bacteremia. To this end, we conducted a retrospective study at a single Japanese center (May 2018-December 2024). The outcomes included length of stay, in-hospital mortality, antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT), and days of antimicrobial spectrum coverage (DASC) score. The pre-BCID2 and BCID2 implementation periods were compared. Among the 2,872 patients with positive blood cultures, BCID2 implementation was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37-0.92, <i>P</i> = 0.021), specifically among those with bacteremia during weekday daytime hours when testing was available (aOR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.89, <i>P</i> = 0.018). Age, sex, and intensive care unit (ICU)/high-care unit (HCU) admission were significant predictors of outcomes across all analyses. Implementing the BCID2 panel during weekday daytime hours within an active antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) could significantly reduce mortality among patients with bacteremia when testing was available; however, it showed no benefits in the overall population. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of continuous availability and effective integration with ASP support to optimize clinical benefits.<b>IMPORTANCE</b>Rapid identification of the bacteria causing bloodstream infections is essential for timely and effective treatment. Traditional laboratory methods are often time-consuming, thus delaying therapy. Therefore, this study examined the application of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel, a rapid molecular test that can detect multiple pathogens and resistance genes within 1 h. We found that introducing this test during limited hours did not improve patient outcomes; rather, achieving optimal clinical impact may depend on continuous availability and effective collaboration with clinical decision-makers. This study emphasizes the need for unlimited access to rapid testing and support from stewardship programs to optimize clinical outcomes from this diagnostic technology in managing bloodstream infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0198025"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing in patients with bacteremia.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Kitagawa, Taito Kitano, Takehito Kasamatsu, Naoyuki Shiraishi, Mai Yasuda, Mai Okada, Soma Suzuki, Madoka Sekine, Ryo Yamanishi, Ayu Mukai, Ritsuki Uejima, Yuki Suzuki, Akiyo Nakano, Ryuichi Nakano, Hisakazu Yano, Fumihiko Nakamura, Koichi Maeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.01980-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rapid identification of pathogens in bacteremia is critical for optimizing antimicrobial therapy. The FilmArray blood culture identification 2 (BCID2) panel enables multiplex PCR-based detection of pathogens and resistance genes. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of BCID2 implementation in hospitalized patients with bacteremia. To this end, we conducted a retrospective study at a single Japanese center (May 2018-December 2024). The outcomes included length of stay, in-hospital mortality, antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT), and days of antimicrobial spectrum coverage (DASC) score. The pre-BCID2 and BCID2 implementation periods were compared. Among the 2,872 patients with positive blood cultures, BCID2 implementation was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37-0.92, <i>P</i> = 0.021), specifically among those with bacteremia during weekday daytime hours when testing was available (aOR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.89, <i>P</i> = 0.018). Age, sex, and intensive care unit (ICU)/high-care unit (HCU) admission were significant predictors of outcomes across all analyses. Implementing the BCID2 panel during weekday daytime hours within an active antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) could significantly reduce mortality among patients with bacteremia when testing was available; however, it showed no benefits in the overall population. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of continuous availability and effective integration with ASP support to optimize clinical benefits.<b>IMPORTANCE</b>Rapid identification of the bacteria causing bloodstream infections is essential for timely and effective treatment. Traditional laboratory methods are often time-consuming, thus delaying therapy. Therefore, this study examined the application of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel, a rapid molecular test that can detect multiple pathogens and resistance genes within 1 h. We found that introducing this test during limited hours did not improve patient outcomes; rather, achieving optimal clinical impact may depend on continuous availability and effective collaboration with clinical decision-makers. This study emphasizes the need for unlimited access to rapid testing and support from stewardship programs to optimize clinical outcomes from this diagnostic technology in managing bloodstream infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0198025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01980-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01980-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
快速鉴定菌血症中的病原体对于优化抗菌治疗至关重要。FilmArray血培养鉴定2 (bccid2)面板可实现基于多重pcr的病原体和耐药基因检测。本研究旨在评估bccid2在住院菌血症患者中的临床效果。为此,我们在一个日本中心进行了回顾性研究(2018年5月至2024年12月)。结果包括住院时间、住院死亡率、抗菌药物治疗天数(DOT)和抗菌药物谱覆盖天数(DASC)评分。比较BCID2实施前和实施后的时间。在2,872例血培养阳性患者中,bbcid2的实施与死亡率的显著降低相关(调整优势比[aOR] 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37-0.92, P = 0.021),特别是在工作日白天可进行检测的菌血症患者中(aOR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.89, P = 0.018)。年龄、性别和入住重症监护室(ICU)/高护病房(HCU)是所有分析结果的重要预测因素。在主动抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)中,在工作日白天时间实施bbcid2小组可以显著降低菌血症患者的死亡率。然而,它在总体人群中没有显示出益处。这项研究的结果强调了持续可用性和与ASP支持有效整合的重要性,以优化临床效益。重要意义:快速鉴定引起血液感染的细菌对于及时有效的治疗至关重要。传统的实验室方法往往耗时,从而延迟治疗。因此,本研究检验了FilmArray血培养鉴定面板的应用,这是一种快速的分子检测,可以在1小时内检测出多种病原体和耐药基因。我们发现,在有限的时间内引入这种检测并没有改善患者的预后;相反,实现最佳的临床影响可能取决于持续的可用性和与临床决策者的有效合作。这项研究强调了对快速检测的无限获取和管理项目的支持的必要性,以优化这种诊断技术在管理血液感染方面的临床结果。
Impact of multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing in patients with bacteremia.
Rapid identification of pathogens in bacteremia is critical for optimizing antimicrobial therapy. The FilmArray blood culture identification 2 (BCID2) panel enables multiplex PCR-based detection of pathogens and resistance genes. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of BCID2 implementation in hospitalized patients with bacteremia. To this end, we conducted a retrospective study at a single Japanese center (May 2018-December 2024). The outcomes included length of stay, in-hospital mortality, antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT), and days of antimicrobial spectrum coverage (DASC) score. The pre-BCID2 and BCID2 implementation periods were compared. Among the 2,872 patients with positive blood cultures, BCID2 implementation was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37-0.92, P = 0.021), specifically among those with bacteremia during weekday daytime hours when testing was available (aOR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.89, P = 0.018). Age, sex, and intensive care unit (ICU)/high-care unit (HCU) admission were significant predictors of outcomes across all analyses. Implementing the BCID2 panel during weekday daytime hours within an active antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) could significantly reduce mortality among patients with bacteremia when testing was available; however, it showed no benefits in the overall population. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of continuous availability and effective integration with ASP support to optimize clinical benefits.IMPORTANCERapid identification of the bacteria causing bloodstream infections is essential for timely and effective treatment. Traditional laboratory methods are often time-consuming, thus delaying therapy. Therefore, this study examined the application of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel, a rapid molecular test that can detect multiple pathogens and resistance genes within 1 h. We found that introducing this test during limited hours did not improve patient outcomes; rather, achieving optimal clinical impact may depend on continuous availability and effective collaboration with clinical decision-makers. This study emphasizes the need for unlimited access to rapid testing and support from stewardship programs to optimize clinical outcomes from this diagnostic technology in managing bloodstream infections.
期刊介绍:
Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.