生物SIS补片腹腔内应用后的炎症反应及粘连形成。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Samir Delibegovic, Enes Idrizovic, Muhamed Katica, Jasminka Mustedanagic, Elmir Cickusic, Aida Katica, Haris Kuralic
{"title":"生物SIS补片腹腔内应用后的炎症反应及粘连形成。","authors":"Samir Delibegovic, Enes Idrizovic, Muhamed Katica, Jasminka Mustedanagic, Elmir Cickusic, Aida Katica, Haris Kuralic","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological mesh derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) has a higher porosity and is more hydrophilic than tissue derived from bovine and cow dermal tissues. Therefore, we believe SIS mesh will lead to a milder inflammatory reaction than other, polypropylene and polypropylene-polydioxanone meshes, fewer adhesions, and less mesh shrinkage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety rats were divided randomly into three groups: in group 1, polypropylene mesh was implanted; in group 2, polypropylene-polydioxanone; and in group 3, the SIS mesh. The meshes were fixed intra-abdominally, in the upper part of the abdomen. Ten animals from each group were sacrificed on days 7, 28, and 60 after the implantation. Relaparotomy was performed, with a left paramedial incision and the adhesions formed were assessed according to the Surgical Membrane Study Group (SMSG) score, along with the percentage of shrinkage of the mesh, and any inflammation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in terms of inflammatory reaction or the formation of adhesions between the meshes tested on the 7th day after implantation. However, the shrinkage of the SIS mesh was more expressed. On days 28 and 60, the SIS mesh caused less inflammatory reaction and formation of adhesions in relation to the other meshes tested. On day 60, there was no significant difference in the size of the meshes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that, despite conflicting views on biological mesh, SIS mesh results in less inflammatory reaction, less adhesion formation, and a lesser degree of shrinkage, and can take its place in hernia repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inflammatory Reaction and Formation of Adhesions after Intraperitoneal Application of Biological SIS Mesh.\",\"authors\":\"Samir Delibegovic, Enes Idrizovic, Muhamed Katica, Jasminka Mustedanagic, Elmir Cickusic, Aida Katica, Haris Kuralic\",\"doi\":\"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological mesh derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) has a higher porosity and is more hydrophilic than tissue derived from bovine and cow dermal tissues. Therefore, we believe SIS mesh will lead to a milder inflammatory reaction than other, polypropylene and polypropylene-polydioxanone meshes, fewer adhesions, and less mesh shrinkage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety rats were divided randomly into three groups: in group 1, polypropylene mesh was implanted; in group 2, polypropylene-polydioxanone; and in group 3, the SIS mesh. The meshes were fixed intra-abdominally, in the upper part of the abdomen. Ten animals from each group were sacrificed on days 7, 28, and 60 after the implantation. Relaparotomy was performed, with a left paramedial incision and the adhesions formed were assessed according to the Surgical Membrane Study Group (SMSG) score, along with the percentage of shrinkage of the mesh, and any inflammation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in terms of inflammatory reaction or the formation of adhesions between the meshes tested on the 7th day after implantation. However, the shrinkage of the SIS mesh was more expressed. On days 28 and 60, the SIS mesh caused less inflammatory reaction and formation of adhesions in relation to the other meshes tested. On day 60, there was no significant difference in the size of the meshes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that, despite conflicting views on biological mesh, SIS mesh results in less inflammatory reaction, less adhesion formation, and a lesser degree of shrinkage, and can take its place in hernia repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453008/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00059\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:来源于猪小肠黏膜下层(SIS)的生物补片比来源于牛和牛皮肤组织的补片具有更高的孔隙度和亲水性。因此,我们认为SIS网将导致比其他,聚丙烯和聚丙烯-聚二氧环酮网更温和的炎症反应,更少的粘连,更少的网收缩。方法:90只大鼠随机分为3组:1组植入聚丙烯网片;第2组为聚丙烯-聚二氧杂环酮;第三组为SIS网。网状物固定在腹部内,位于腹部上部。各组分别于植入后第7、28、60天处死10只。再开腹手术,左侧旁切口,根据外科膜研究组(SMSG)评分评估粘连形成情况,以及补片收缩百分比和任何炎症。结果:植入后第7天,两组间的炎症反应及粘连形成均无差异。而SIS网的收缩更明显。在第28天和第60天,与其他网片相比,SIS网片引起的炎症反应和粘连形成较少。第60天,两组间网目尺寸无显著差异。结论:本研究证实,尽管对生物补片有不同的看法,但SIS补片炎症反应少,粘连形成少,收缩程度小,可以替代其在疝修补中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inflammatory Reaction and Formation of Adhesions after Intraperitoneal Application of Biological SIS Mesh.

Background: Biological mesh derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) has a higher porosity and is more hydrophilic than tissue derived from bovine and cow dermal tissues. Therefore, we believe SIS mesh will lead to a milder inflammatory reaction than other, polypropylene and polypropylene-polydioxanone meshes, fewer adhesions, and less mesh shrinkage.

Methods: Ninety rats were divided randomly into three groups: in group 1, polypropylene mesh was implanted; in group 2, polypropylene-polydioxanone; and in group 3, the SIS mesh. The meshes were fixed intra-abdominally, in the upper part of the abdomen. Ten animals from each group were sacrificed on days 7, 28, and 60 after the implantation. Relaparotomy was performed, with a left paramedial incision and the adhesions formed were assessed according to the Surgical Membrane Study Group (SMSG) score, along with the percentage of shrinkage of the mesh, and any inflammation.

Results: There were no differences in terms of inflammatory reaction or the formation of adhesions between the meshes tested on the 7th day after implantation. However, the shrinkage of the SIS mesh was more expressed. On days 28 and 60, the SIS mesh caused less inflammatory reaction and formation of adhesions in relation to the other meshes tested. On day 60, there was no significant difference in the size of the meshes.

Conclusion: This study confirmed that, despite conflicting views on biological mesh, SIS mesh results in less inflammatory reaction, less adhesion formation, and a lesser degree of shrinkage, and can take its place in hernia repair.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信