内镜下结肠活检报告格式的开发和验证。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Kishore Khatri, Neha Bagga, Apoorvi Dubey, Rajni Joshee, Yogiraj Joshi
{"title":"内镜下结肠活检报告格式的开发和验证。","authors":"Kishore Khatri, Neha Bagga, Apoorvi Dubey, Rajni Joshee, Yogiraj Joshi","doi":"10.25259/IJMR_355_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives Non-neoplastic diseases make a considerable part of daily workload of gastroenterologist and an endoscopist. As there are only a few endoscopic findings in literature to suggest a large era of colonic diseases, endoscopic biopsy is a must, to reach a definitive diagnosis. This needs a checklist or a similar format that contains all the important histological features to be seen in a colonic biopsy which is currently lacking in published literature. Hence, this study aimed to develop a format for reporting endoscopic colonic biopsies a first of a kind as per our knowledge particularly for non-neoplastic colonic diseases using modified kappa statistics. Methods Seventy one questions were included in this format after searching in various search engines using various phrases. These questions were reviewed by experts and changes were done accordingly. The finalized questionnaire was further shared with 20 subject matter experts. Their feedback was utilized to determine the Content Validity Index (CVI), calculated at both the item level (I-CVI) and the overall scale level (S-CVI), along with the modified kappa coefficient. For studies involving more than six experts, an I-CVI of 0.78 and an S-CVI/average of 0.9 were considered acceptable benchmarks. Results Fourteen out of 20 experts responded. Mean I-CVI for relevance across all items was 0.933, S-CVI/Average (based on proportion data) across all experts was 0.94 and Mean I-CVI was well above 0.78 (0.928). Interpretation & conclusions The scores indicated a strong agreement among experts on various histological features to be seen in an endoscopic colonic biopsy. These findings clearly indicates that the format met the content validity criteria and hence histological sections of endoscopic colonic biopsies can be read using this format.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"162 1","pages":"111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development & validation of a format for reporting endoscopic colonic biopsies.\",\"authors\":\"Kishore Khatri, Neha Bagga, Apoorvi Dubey, Rajni Joshee, Yogiraj Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/IJMR_355_2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background & objectives Non-neoplastic diseases make a considerable part of daily workload of gastroenterologist and an endoscopist. As there are only a few endoscopic findings in literature to suggest a large era of colonic diseases, endoscopic biopsy is a must, to reach a definitive diagnosis. This needs a checklist or a similar format that contains all the important histological features to be seen in a colonic biopsy which is currently lacking in published literature. Hence, this study aimed to develop a format for reporting endoscopic colonic biopsies a first of a kind as per our knowledge particularly for non-neoplastic colonic diseases using modified kappa statistics. Methods Seventy one questions were included in this format after searching in various search engines using various phrases. These questions were reviewed by experts and changes were done accordingly. The finalized questionnaire was further shared with 20 subject matter experts. Their feedback was utilized to determine the Content Validity Index (CVI), calculated at both the item level (I-CVI) and the overall scale level (S-CVI), along with the modified kappa coefficient. For studies involving more than six experts, an I-CVI of 0.78 and an S-CVI/average of 0.9 were considered acceptable benchmarks. Results Fourteen out of 20 experts responded. Mean I-CVI for relevance across all items was 0.933, S-CVI/Average (based on proportion data) across all experts was 0.94 and Mean I-CVI was well above 0.78 (0.928). Interpretation & conclusions The scores indicated a strong agreement among experts on various histological features to be seen in an endoscopic colonic biopsy. These findings clearly indicates that the format met the content validity criteria and hence histological sections of endoscopic colonic biopsies can be read using this format.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"162 1\",\"pages\":\"111-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_355_2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_355_2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的非肿瘤性疾病是胃肠病学家和内窥镜医师日常工作的重要组成部分。由于文献中只有少数内镜检查结果提示大量结肠疾病,因此内镜活检是必须的,以达到明确的诊断。这需要一份清单或类似的格式,其中包含结肠活检中所见的所有重要组织学特征,这是目前发表的文献所缺乏的。因此,本研究旨在开发一种报告内镜结肠活检的格式,据我们所知,这是第一种使用改良kappa统计的非肿瘤性结肠疾病的报告格式。方法在不同的搜索引擎中使用不同的短语进行检索后,将71个问题纳入该格式。专家对这些问题进行了审查,并进行了相应的修改。最后定稿的调查表进一步与20名主题专家分享。他们的反馈被用来确定内容效度指数(CVI),在项目水平(I-CVI)和总体量表水平(S-CVI)计算,以及修正的卡帕系数。对于涉及6名以上专家的研究,I-CVI为0.78,S-CVI/平均值为0.9被认为是可接受的基准。结果20名专家中有14人回复。所有项目相关性的平均I-CVI为0.933,所有专家的S-CVI/平均值(基于比例数据)为0.94,平均I-CVI远高于0.78(0.928)。解释和结论评分表明专家对内镜结肠活检中所见的各种组织学特征有强烈的共识。这些发现清楚地表明,该格式符合内容效度标准,因此内镜结肠活检的组织学切片可以使用该格式读取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development & validation of a format for reporting endoscopic colonic biopsies.

Background & objectives Non-neoplastic diseases make a considerable part of daily workload of gastroenterologist and an endoscopist. As there are only a few endoscopic findings in literature to suggest a large era of colonic diseases, endoscopic biopsy is a must, to reach a definitive diagnosis. This needs a checklist or a similar format that contains all the important histological features to be seen in a colonic biopsy which is currently lacking in published literature. Hence, this study aimed to develop a format for reporting endoscopic colonic biopsies a first of a kind as per our knowledge particularly for non-neoplastic colonic diseases using modified kappa statistics. Methods Seventy one questions were included in this format after searching in various search engines using various phrases. These questions were reviewed by experts and changes were done accordingly. The finalized questionnaire was further shared with 20 subject matter experts. Their feedback was utilized to determine the Content Validity Index (CVI), calculated at both the item level (I-CVI) and the overall scale level (S-CVI), along with the modified kappa coefficient. For studies involving more than six experts, an I-CVI of 0.78 and an S-CVI/average of 0.9 were considered acceptable benchmarks. Results Fourteen out of 20 experts responded. Mean I-CVI for relevance across all items was 0.933, S-CVI/Average (based on proportion data) across all experts was 0.94 and Mean I-CVI was well above 0.78 (0.928). Interpretation & conclusions The scores indicated a strong agreement among experts on various histological features to be seen in an endoscopic colonic biopsy. These findings clearly indicates that the format met the content validity criteria and hence histological sections of endoscopic colonic biopsies can be read using this format.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信