与单一栽培相比,带状种植有希望增加地面甲虫群落多样性。

IF 6.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
eLife Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI:10.7554/eLife.104762
Luuk Croijmans, Fogelina Cuperus, Dirk F van Apeldoorn, Felix J J A Bianchi, Walter A H Rossing, Erik H Poelman
{"title":"与单一栽培相比,带状种植有希望增加地面甲虫群落多样性。","authors":"Luuk Croijmans, Fogelina Cuperus, Dirk F van Apeldoorn, Felix J J A Bianchi, Walter A H Rossing, Erik H Poelman","doi":"10.7554/eLife.104762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global biodiversity is declining at an unprecedented rate, with agriculture as one of the major drivers. There is mounting evidence that intercropping can increase insect biodiversity while maintaining or increasing yield. Yet, intercropping is often considered impractical for mechanized farming systems. Strip cropping is a type of intercropping that is compatible with standard farm machinery and has been pioneered by Dutch farmers since 2014. Here, we present ground beetle data from four organically managed experimental farms across four years. Ground beetles are sensitive to changes in habitats and disturbances, and hold keystone positions in agroecosystem food webs. We show that strip cropping systems can enhance ground beetle biodiversity, while other studies showed that these increases have been achieved without incurring major yield loss. Strip-cropped fields had on average 15% more ground beetle species and 30% more individuals than monocultural fields. The higher ground beetle richness in strip crops was explained by the merger of crop-related ground beetle communities, rather than by ground beetle species unique to strip cropping systems. The increase in field-level beetle species richness in organic agriculture through strip cropping approached increases found for other readily deployed biodiversity conservation methods, like shifting from conventional to organic agriculture (+19% -+23%). This indicates that strip cropping is a potentially useful tool supporting ground beetle biodiversity in agricultural fields without compromising food production.</p>","PeriodicalId":11640,"journal":{"name":"eLife","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strip cropping shows promising increases in ground beetle community diversity compared to monocultures.\",\"authors\":\"Luuk Croijmans, Fogelina Cuperus, Dirk F van Apeldoorn, Felix J J A Bianchi, Walter A H Rossing, Erik H Poelman\",\"doi\":\"10.7554/eLife.104762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Global biodiversity is declining at an unprecedented rate, with agriculture as one of the major drivers. There is mounting evidence that intercropping can increase insect biodiversity while maintaining or increasing yield. Yet, intercropping is often considered impractical for mechanized farming systems. Strip cropping is a type of intercropping that is compatible with standard farm machinery and has been pioneered by Dutch farmers since 2014. Here, we present ground beetle data from four organically managed experimental farms across four years. Ground beetles are sensitive to changes in habitats and disturbances, and hold keystone positions in agroecosystem food webs. We show that strip cropping systems can enhance ground beetle biodiversity, while other studies showed that these increases have been achieved without incurring major yield loss. Strip-cropped fields had on average 15% more ground beetle species and 30% more individuals than monocultural fields. The higher ground beetle richness in strip crops was explained by the merger of crop-related ground beetle communities, rather than by ground beetle species unique to strip cropping systems. The increase in field-level beetle species richness in organic agriculture through strip cropping approached increases found for other readily deployed biodiversity conservation methods, like shifting from conventional to organic agriculture (+19% -+23%). This indicates that strip cropping is a potentially useful tool supporting ground beetle biodiversity in agricultural fields without compromising food production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eLife\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456951/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eLife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104762\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eLife","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104762","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球生物多样性正在以前所未有的速度下降,农业是主要驱动因素之一。越来越多的证据表明间作可以在保持或提高产量的同时增加昆虫的生物多样性。然而,间作通常被认为不适合机械化耕作系统。带状种植是一种与标准农业机械兼容的间作,自2014年以来由荷兰农民首创。在这里,我们展示了四个有机管理实验农场四年来的地面甲虫数据。地面甲虫对栖息地的变化和干扰非常敏感,在农业生态系统的食物网中占有重要地位。我们的研究表明,带状种植系统可以提高地面甲虫的生物多样性,而其他研究表明,这些增加是在没有造成重大产量损失的情况下实现的。与单作田相比,带状田的地面甲虫种类平均多15%,个体数量平均多30%。带状作物的地面甲虫丰富度较高的原因是与作物相关的地面甲虫群落的合并,而不是带状作物系统特有的地面甲虫种类。在有机农业中,通过轮作增加的田间甲虫物种丰富度接近于其他易于部署的生物多样性保护方法,如从传统农业转向有机农业(+19% -+23%)。这表明,在不影响粮食生产的情况下,带状种植是支持农田地面甲虫生物多样性的潜在有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strip cropping shows promising increases in ground beetle community diversity compared to monocultures.

Global biodiversity is declining at an unprecedented rate, with agriculture as one of the major drivers. There is mounting evidence that intercropping can increase insect biodiversity while maintaining or increasing yield. Yet, intercropping is often considered impractical for mechanized farming systems. Strip cropping is a type of intercropping that is compatible with standard farm machinery and has been pioneered by Dutch farmers since 2014. Here, we present ground beetle data from four organically managed experimental farms across four years. Ground beetles are sensitive to changes in habitats and disturbances, and hold keystone positions in agroecosystem food webs. We show that strip cropping systems can enhance ground beetle biodiversity, while other studies showed that these increases have been achieved without incurring major yield loss. Strip-cropped fields had on average 15% more ground beetle species and 30% more individuals than monocultural fields. The higher ground beetle richness in strip crops was explained by the merger of crop-related ground beetle communities, rather than by ground beetle species unique to strip cropping systems. The increase in field-level beetle species richness in organic agriculture through strip cropping approached increases found for other readily deployed biodiversity conservation methods, like shifting from conventional to organic agriculture (+19% -+23%). This indicates that strip cropping is a potentially useful tool supporting ground beetle biodiversity in agricultural fields without compromising food production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eLife
eLife BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.90%
发文量
3122
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: eLife is a distinguished, not-for-profit, peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that specializes in the fields of biomedical and life sciences. eLife is known for its selective publication process, which includes a variety of article types such as: Research Articles: Detailed reports of original research findings. Short Reports: Concise presentations of significant findings that do not warrant a full-length research article. Tools and Resources: Descriptions of new tools, technologies, or resources that facilitate scientific research. Research Advances: Brief reports on significant scientific advancements that have immediate implications for the field. Scientific Correspondence: Short communications that comment on or provide additional information related to published articles. Review Articles: Comprehensive overviews of a specific topic or field within the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信