Eric L Simpson, Jonathan I Silverberg, Bob Geng, José-Manuel Carrascosa, Thomas Bieber, Patrick M Brunner, Delphine Staumont-Sallé, Chao Ji, Pinaki Biswas, Claire Feeney, Irene Hernández-Martín, Francisco José Rebollo Laserna, Herwig Koppensteiner
{"title":"过敏性合并症会改变阿布替尼或杜匹单抗治疗中重度特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性吗？","authors":"Eric L Simpson, Jonathan I Silverberg, Bob Geng, José-Manuel Carrascosa, Thomas Bieber, Patrick M Brunner, Delphine Staumont-Sallé, Chao Ji, Pinaki Biswas, Claire Feeney, Irene Hernández-Martín, Francisco José Rebollo Laserna, Herwig Koppensteiner","doi":"10.1007/s13555-025-01516-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Allergic comorbidities are common in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Individual trials with abrocitinib or dupilumab demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe AD and allergic comorbidities. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 JADE COMPARE and DARE trials compared efficacy, safety, and quality of life following abrocitinib and dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, with or without comorbid asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were pooled from patients who received abrocitinib (200 mg/day) or dupilumab (300 mg/every 2 weeks) for 16 weeks with concomitant topical therapy. Assessments by self-reported asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy included the proportion of patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment of clear or almost clear (IGA 0/1), ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), ≥ 4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4), least squares mean change from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1195 patients (abrocitinib, n = 588; dupilumab, n = 607), 377 (32%), 225 (19%), and 211 (18%) patients self-reported comorbid asthma, food allergy, or allergic rhinitis, respectively. Week 16 IGA 0/1 responses were comparable between patients with/without comorbidity with abrocitinib (52%/54% [with/without asthma], 50%/54% [with/without allergic rhinitis], and 53%/53% [with/without food allergy]) or dupilumab (42%/42%, 37%/43%, and 47%/41%). EASI-75 and PP-NRS4 responses and DLQI and SCORAD improvements were also comparable between patients with/without comorbidity in each treatment arm. Treatment-emergent adverse events were more common in patients with comorbidities in the abrocitinib (76%/67% [with/without asthma], 80%/67% [with/without allergic rhinitis], and 78%/67% [with/without food allergy]) and dupilumab (71%/53%, 71%/57%, and 62%/59%) arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abrocitinib and dupilumab improved AD signs and symptoms with a manageable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, regardless of asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy. Graphical Abstract available for this article.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03720470 (JADE COMPARE) and NCT04345367 (DARE).</p>","PeriodicalId":11186,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Allergic Comorbidities Alter the Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib or Dupilumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis?\",\"authors\":\"Eric L Simpson, Jonathan I Silverberg, Bob Geng, José-Manuel Carrascosa, Thomas Bieber, Patrick M Brunner, Delphine Staumont-Sallé, Chao Ji, Pinaki Biswas, Claire Feeney, Irene Hernández-Martín, Francisco José Rebollo Laserna, Herwig Koppensteiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13555-025-01516-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Allergic comorbidities are common in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Individual trials with abrocitinib or dupilumab demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe AD and allergic comorbidities. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 JADE COMPARE and DARE trials compared efficacy, safety, and quality of life following abrocitinib and dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, with or without comorbid asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were pooled from patients who received abrocitinib (200 mg/day) or dupilumab (300 mg/every 2 weeks) for 16 weeks with concomitant topical therapy. Assessments by self-reported asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy included the proportion of patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment of clear or almost clear (IGA 0/1), ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), ≥ 4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4), least squares mean change from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1195 patients (abrocitinib, n = 588; dupilumab, n = 607), 377 (32%), 225 (19%), and 211 (18%) patients self-reported comorbid asthma, food allergy, or allergic rhinitis, respectively. Week 16 IGA 0/1 responses were comparable between patients with/without comorbidity with abrocitinib (52%/54% [with/without asthma], 50%/54% [with/without allergic rhinitis], and 53%/53% [with/without food allergy]) or dupilumab (42%/42%, 37%/43%, and 47%/41%). EASI-75 and PP-NRS4 responses and DLQI and SCORAD improvements were also comparable between patients with/without comorbidity in each treatment arm. Treatment-emergent adverse events were more common in patients with comorbidities in the abrocitinib (76%/67% [with/without asthma], 80%/67% [with/without allergic rhinitis], and 78%/67% [with/without food allergy]) and dupilumab (71%/53%, 71%/57%, and 62%/59%) arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abrocitinib and dupilumab improved AD signs and symptoms with a manageable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, regardless of asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy. Graphical Abstract available for this article.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03720470 (JADE COMPARE) and NCT04345367 (DARE).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-025-01516-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-025-01516-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do Allergic Comorbidities Alter the Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib or Dupilumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis?
Introduction: Allergic comorbidities are common in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Individual trials with abrocitinib or dupilumab demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe AD and allergic comorbidities. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 JADE COMPARE and DARE trials compared efficacy, safety, and quality of life following abrocitinib and dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, with or without comorbid asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy.
Methods: Data were pooled from patients who received abrocitinib (200 mg/day) or dupilumab (300 mg/every 2 weeks) for 16 weeks with concomitant topical therapy. Assessments by self-reported asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy included the proportion of patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment of clear or almost clear (IGA 0/1), ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), ≥ 4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4), least squares mean change from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), and safety.
Results: Of 1195 patients (abrocitinib, n = 588; dupilumab, n = 607), 377 (32%), 225 (19%), and 211 (18%) patients self-reported comorbid asthma, food allergy, or allergic rhinitis, respectively. Week 16 IGA 0/1 responses were comparable between patients with/without comorbidity with abrocitinib (52%/54% [with/without asthma], 50%/54% [with/without allergic rhinitis], and 53%/53% [with/without food allergy]) or dupilumab (42%/42%, 37%/43%, and 47%/41%). EASI-75 and PP-NRS4 responses and DLQI and SCORAD improvements were also comparable between patients with/without comorbidity in each treatment arm. Treatment-emergent adverse events were more common in patients with comorbidities in the abrocitinib (76%/67% [with/without asthma], 80%/67% [with/without allergic rhinitis], and 78%/67% [with/without food allergy]) and dupilumab (71%/53%, 71%/57%, and 62%/59%) arms.
Conclusion: Abrocitinib and dupilumab improved AD signs and symptoms with a manageable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, regardless of asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy. Graphical Abstract available for this article.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03720470 (JADE COMPARE) and NCT04345367 (DARE).
期刊介绍：
Dermatology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance). The journal is dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of dermatological therapies. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health and epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
Areas of focus include, but are not limited to all clinical aspects of dermatology, such as skin pharmacology; skin development and aging; prevention, diagnosis, and management of skin disorders and melanomas; research into dermal structures and pathology; and all areas of aesthetic dermatology, including skin maintenance, dermatological surgery, and lasers.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/case series, trial protocols, and short communications. Dermatology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an International and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. The journal appeals to a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
