十年过去了:我们在患者参与诊断方面取得了多大进展?

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI:10.1515/dx-2025-0125
Helen Haskell, Traber Giardina, Io Dolka, Kathryn M McDonald
{"title":"十年过去了:我们在患者参与诊断方面取得了多大进展?","authors":"Helen Haskell, Traber Giardina, Io Dolka, Kathryn M McDonald","doi":"10.1515/dx-2025-0125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2015 National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine report, Improving Diagnosis in Medicine, is known for its inclusive approach to patients. This paper explores the evolution of research in patient engagement in diagnosis over the past decade, drawing from peer-reviewed literature, policy initiatives, and institutional programs. Major themes include expansion from practical patient aids to co-designed patient reporting systems and patient-reported measures; a focus on diagnostic equity across all populations and conditions; and the emergence of comprehensive multidisciplinary theories framing a \"diagnostic ecosystem.\" Drivers of change include long-standing frameworks for patient engagement, advances in health information technology, open access to medical records, and regulatory initiatives designed to enhance patient autonomy and enable systematic capture of patient perspectives. Future research in this area should improve patient-reported measures and reporting systems, identify and address diagnostic disparities, and co-create pathways to fully embrace and value the emerging patient voice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten years on: how far have we come in patient engagement in diagnosis?\",\"authors\":\"Helen Haskell, Traber Giardina, Io Dolka, Kathryn M McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/dx-2025-0125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The 2015 National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine report, Improving Diagnosis in Medicine, is known for its inclusive approach to patients. This paper explores the evolution of research in patient engagement in diagnosis over the past decade, drawing from peer-reviewed literature, policy initiatives, and institutional programs. Major themes include expansion from practical patient aids to co-designed patient reporting systems and patient-reported measures; a focus on diagnostic equity across all populations and conditions; and the emergence of comprehensive multidisciplinary theories framing a \\\"diagnostic ecosystem.\\\" Drivers of change include long-standing frameworks for patient engagement, advances in health information technology, open access to medical records, and regulatory initiatives designed to enhance patient autonomy and enable systematic capture of patient perspectives. Future research in this area should improve patient-reported measures and reporting systems, identify and address diagnostic disparities, and co-create pathways to fully embrace and value the emerging patient voice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2015年美国国家科学、工程和医学院的报告《改善医学诊断》以其对患者的包容性方法而闻名。本文从同行评议文献、政策倡议和机构计划中探讨了过去十年中患者参与诊断研究的演变。主要主题包括从实用的患者辅助设备扩展到共同设计的患者报告系统和患者报告措施;注重所有人群和病症的诊断公平性;以及构建“诊断生态系统”的综合多学科理论的出现。推动变革的因素包括患者参与的长期框架、卫生信息技术的进步、医疗记录的开放获取,以及旨在增强患者自主权和系统地捕捉患者观点的监管举措。未来该领域的研究应改进患者报告措施和报告系统,识别和解决诊断差异,并共同创造途径,以充分接受和重视新出现的患者声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ten years on: how far have we come in patient engagement in diagnosis?

The 2015 National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine report, Improving Diagnosis in Medicine, is known for its inclusive approach to patients. This paper explores the evolution of research in patient engagement in diagnosis over the past decade, drawing from peer-reviewed literature, policy initiatives, and institutional programs. Major themes include expansion from practical patient aids to co-designed patient reporting systems and patient-reported measures; a focus on diagnostic equity across all populations and conditions; and the emergence of comprehensive multidisciplinary theories framing a "diagnostic ecosystem." Drivers of change include long-standing frameworks for patient engagement, advances in health information technology, open access to medical records, and regulatory initiatives designed to enhance patient autonomy and enable systematic capture of patient perspectives. Future research in this area should improve patient-reported measures and reporting systems, identify and address diagnostic disparities, and co-create pathways to fully embrace and value the emerging patient voice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信