{"title":"回顾:有精神障碍的移植候选人的结局。","authors":"Kathy L Coffman","doi":"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Transplantation in candidates with psychotic disorders has been a controversial topic for over 40 years. Reviewing the outcomes of these candidates may inform decisions going forward, though it is unclear whether outcomes with kidney recipients is generalizable to other organs, which are life-sparing not mainly life-enhancing.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Outcomes in recipients with psychotic disorders after kidney transplants were described in three studies. Outcomes with heart, lung, pancreas, and small bowel or multivisceral transplants is sparse to nonexistent. There were 26 cases and 8 case series published, mostly highly selected patients, with small sample size, and the majority had less than 3-year follow-up. Guidelines were proposed for this population based on a survey of 12 centers.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>More systematic study is needed on the risks and barriers to transplantation in these candidates. More data is needed regarding outcomes in those recipients with life-sparing transplants for whom there is not a rescue plan in case the graft is lost. Candidates should be evaluated on an individual basis based on known risk factors in accordance with the ethical principles of beneficence, justice, and utility in the face of scarce resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":10900,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review: outcomes of transplant candidates with psychotic disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Kathy L Coffman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Transplantation in candidates with psychotic disorders has been a controversial topic for over 40 years. Reviewing the outcomes of these candidates may inform decisions going forward, though it is unclear whether outcomes with kidney recipients is generalizable to other organs, which are life-sparing not mainly life-enhancing.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Outcomes in recipients with psychotic disorders after kidney transplants were described in three studies. Outcomes with heart, lung, pancreas, and small bowel or multivisceral transplants is sparse to nonexistent. There were 26 cases and 8 case series published, mostly highly selected patients, with small sample size, and the majority had less than 3-year follow-up. Guidelines were proposed for this population based on a survey of 12 centers.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>More systematic study is needed on the risks and barriers to transplantation in these candidates. More data is needed regarding outcomes in those recipients with life-sparing transplants for whom there is not a rescue plan in case the graft is lost. Candidates should be evaluated on an individual basis based on known risk factors in accordance with the ethical principles of beneficence, justice, and utility in the face of scarce resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001251\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review: outcomes of transplant candidates with psychotic disorders.
Purpose of review: Transplantation in candidates with psychotic disorders has been a controversial topic for over 40 years. Reviewing the outcomes of these candidates may inform decisions going forward, though it is unclear whether outcomes with kidney recipients is generalizable to other organs, which are life-sparing not mainly life-enhancing.
Recent findings: Outcomes in recipients with psychotic disorders after kidney transplants were described in three studies. Outcomes with heart, lung, pancreas, and small bowel or multivisceral transplants is sparse to nonexistent. There were 26 cases and 8 case series published, mostly highly selected patients, with small sample size, and the majority had less than 3-year follow-up. Guidelines were proposed for this population based on a survey of 12 centers.
Summary: More systematic study is needed on the risks and barriers to transplantation in these candidates. More data is needed regarding outcomes in those recipients with life-sparing transplants for whom there is not a rescue plan in case the graft is lost. Candidates should be evaluated on an individual basis based on known risk factors in accordance with the ethical principles of beneficence, justice, and utility in the face of scarce resources.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation is an indispensable resource featuring key, up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. Led by renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation delivers a fresh insight into topics such as stem cell transplantation, immunosuppression, tolerance induction and organ preservation and procurement. With 18 sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, surgeons and other healthcare professionals alike.