以引导自助CBT作为治疗选择的初级保健行为健康(pchh)评估——一项单盲随机多中心试验(KAIROS)的协议

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anneli Farnsworth von Cederwald, Sigrid Salomonsson, Nils Hentati Isacsson, Viktor Kaldo
{"title":"以引导自助CBT作为治疗选择的初级保健行为健康(pchh)评估——一项单盲随机多中心试验(KAIROS)的协议","authors":"Anneli Farnsworth von Cederwald, Sigrid Salomonsson, Nils Hentati Isacsson, Viktor Kaldo","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13232-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While protocol-based psychological treatments have significantly advanced mental health care, real-world accessibility remains a challenge. Primary care, the main provider of mental health services, faces barriers such as limited resources and a diverse patient population with varying needs, making it difficult to rely solely on time-intensive, protocolized treatments. The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model promotes brief, flexible interventions that may better accommodate these needs. However, limited research on these interventions raises concerns about potential undertreatment. To align with Universal Health Coverage principles, it is essential to identify which patient groups benefit most from resource-efficient protocol-based versus brief, flexible, and individualized treatments. Our main aim is to evaluate whether a integrating guided self-help into PCBH improves outcomes compared to the core PCBH model, as well as to assess whether patients identified as suitable for protocol-based interventions benefit more from the combined model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients seeking help for mental or behavioral health problems at PCBH primary care centers will be randomized to one of two arms: core PCBH, where patients receive a contextual assessment and brief interventions tailored to their needs, or an extended PCBH model, where a diagnostic assessment determines whether patients receive brief interventions or guided self-help. The primary outcome is functional impairment, assessed at baseline and followed up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (primary endpoint), as well as at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include symptom change, cost-effectiveness, and care process factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study design allows for comparisons of patient outcomes between the two care models, with a primary focus on evaluating superiority and a secondary focus on non-inferiority, cost-effectiveness, and care process factors. Overall, the project seeks to advance understanding of effective mental health interventions in primary care settings and inform decision-making regarding treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04900064. Registered on May 25th, 2021. Registered with the Swedish Ethical Review Board (2020-04198) on October 12th, 2020. This protocol was submitted for publication on March 18th, 2025, prior to the inclusion of the final participant, and will shortly thereafter, without any changes, be made publicly available as a preprint in an open-access repository.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"1208"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) with guided self-help CBT as a treatment option - a protocol of a single-blind randomized multicenter trial (KAIROS).\",\"authors\":\"Anneli Farnsworth von Cederwald, Sigrid Salomonsson, Nils Hentati Isacsson, Viktor Kaldo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-13232-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While protocol-based psychological treatments have significantly advanced mental health care, real-world accessibility remains a challenge. Primary care, the main provider of mental health services, faces barriers such as limited resources and a diverse patient population with varying needs, making it difficult to rely solely on time-intensive, protocolized treatments. The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model promotes brief, flexible interventions that may better accommodate these needs. However, limited research on these interventions raises concerns about potential undertreatment. To align with Universal Health Coverage principles, it is essential to identify which patient groups benefit most from resource-efficient protocol-based versus brief, flexible, and individualized treatments. Our main aim is to evaluate whether a integrating guided self-help into PCBH improves outcomes compared to the core PCBH model, as well as to assess whether patients identified as suitable for protocol-based interventions benefit more from the combined model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients seeking help for mental or behavioral health problems at PCBH primary care centers will be randomized to one of two arms: core PCBH, where patients receive a contextual assessment and brief interventions tailored to their needs, or an extended PCBH model, where a diagnostic assessment determines whether patients receive brief interventions or guided self-help. The primary outcome is functional impairment, assessed at baseline and followed up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (primary endpoint), as well as at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include symptom change, cost-effectiveness, and care process factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study design allows for comparisons of patient outcomes between the two care models, with a primary focus on evaluating superiority and a secondary focus on non-inferiority, cost-effectiveness, and care process factors. Overall, the project seeks to advance understanding of effective mental health interventions in primary care settings and inform decision-making regarding treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04900064. Registered on May 25th, 2021. Registered with the Swedish Ethical Review Board (2020-04198) on October 12th, 2020. This protocol was submitted for publication on March 18th, 2025, prior to the inclusion of the final participant, and will shortly thereafter, without any changes, be made publicly available as a preprint in an open-access repository.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455819/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13232-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13232-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然基于协议的心理治疗显著地促进了精神卫生保健,但现实世界的可及性仍然是一个挑战。初级保健作为精神卫生服务的主要提供者,面临着资源有限和不同需求的不同患者群体等障碍,因此很难完全依赖耗时的、有方案的治疗。初级保健行为健康(pchh)模式提倡简短、灵活的干预措施,以更好地适应这些需求。然而,对这些干预措施的有限研究引起了人们对潜在治疗不足的担忧。为了与全民健康覆盖原则保持一致,必须确定哪些患者群体从资源高效的基于方案的治疗与简短、灵活和个性化的治疗中受益最大。我们的主要目的是评估与核心pchh模型相比,将引导自助纳入pchh是否能改善结果,以及评估被确定适合基于协议的干预措施的患者是否从组合模型中获益更多。方法:在pchh初级保健中心寻求精神或行为健康问题帮助的患者将被随机分为两组:核心pchh组,患者接受情境评估和针对其需求的简短干预;或扩展pchh组,诊断评估决定患者是否接受简短干预或指导自助。主要终点是功能损害,在基线时进行评估,并在4周、8周和12周(主要终点)以及1年时进行随访。次要结局包括症状改变、成本效益和护理过程因素。讨论:研究设计允许比较两种护理模式之间的患者结果,主要侧重于评估优势,次要侧重于非劣效性、成本效益和护理过程因素。总体而言,该项目旨在增进对初级保健机构中有效的精神卫生干预措施的了解,并为有关治疗方法的决策提供信息。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04900064。于2021年5月25日注册。于2020年10月12日在瑞典伦理审查委员会(2020-04198)注册。该协议于2025年3月18日提交,在最终参与者加入之前发布,此后不久,不作任何更改,将在开放存取存储库中作为预印本公开提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) with guided self-help CBT as a treatment option - a protocol of a single-blind randomized multicenter trial (KAIROS).

Background: While protocol-based psychological treatments have significantly advanced mental health care, real-world accessibility remains a challenge. Primary care, the main provider of mental health services, faces barriers such as limited resources and a diverse patient population with varying needs, making it difficult to rely solely on time-intensive, protocolized treatments. The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model promotes brief, flexible interventions that may better accommodate these needs. However, limited research on these interventions raises concerns about potential undertreatment. To align with Universal Health Coverage principles, it is essential to identify which patient groups benefit most from resource-efficient protocol-based versus brief, flexible, and individualized treatments. Our main aim is to evaluate whether a integrating guided self-help into PCBH improves outcomes compared to the core PCBH model, as well as to assess whether patients identified as suitable for protocol-based interventions benefit more from the combined model.

Methods: Patients seeking help for mental or behavioral health problems at PCBH primary care centers will be randomized to one of two arms: core PCBH, where patients receive a contextual assessment and brief interventions tailored to their needs, or an extended PCBH model, where a diagnostic assessment determines whether patients receive brief interventions or guided self-help. The primary outcome is functional impairment, assessed at baseline and followed up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (primary endpoint), as well as at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include symptom change, cost-effectiveness, and care process factors.

Discussion: The study design allows for comparisons of patient outcomes between the two care models, with a primary focus on evaluating superiority and a secondary focus on non-inferiority, cost-effectiveness, and care process factors. Overall, the project seeks to advance understanding of effective mental health interventions in primary care settings and inform decision-making regarding treatment approaches.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04900064. Registered on May 25th, 2021. Registered with the Swedish Ethical Review Board (2020-04198) on October 12th, 2020. This protocol was submitted for publication on March 18th, 2025, prior to the inclusion of the final participant, and will shortly thereafter, without any changes, be made publicly available as a preprint in an open-access repository.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信