分散参与者的临床试验药品供应和研究材料管理——来自Trials@Home径向概念验证试验的见解。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Megan Heath, Amos J de Jong, Shaun Magorrian-Spence, Chao Jin, Danny R van Weelij, Lucas Pagnier, Yvonne van Rijswick, Volker Haufe, Bart Lagerwaard, Mira G P Zuidgeest
{"title":"分散参与者的临床试验药品供应和研究材料管理——来自Trials@Home径向概念验证试验的见解。","authors":"Megan Heath, Amos J de Jong, Shaun Magorrian-Spence, Chao Jin, Danny R van Weelij, Lucas Pagnier, Yvonne van Rijswick, Volker Haufe, Bart Lagerwaard, Mira G P Zuidgeest","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs), which move trial activities to participants' homes or direct surroundings, offer potential advantages over conventional site-based trials through reduced participant burden and improved accessibility. The direct-to-participant (DtP) delivery of investigational medicinal products (IMPs) and other study materials and collection of biological samples requires careful planning and execution to ensure participant safety and data integrity. Here, we report operational experiences from the RADIAL proof-of-concept trial, a three-arm parallel-group study conducted across six European countries comparing conventional, hybrid, and fully decentralized approaches in type 2 diabetes patients. The study implemented two DtP IMP models: clinical trial site-to-participant and central pharmacy-to-participant delivery, with comprehensive logistics tracking and temperature monitoring. In RADIAL, 68 DtP IMP shipments were executed with a 94% successful delivery rate. Four shipments (6%) failed due to participant unavailability, temperature excursions, defective monitoring equipment, or courier loss. The central pharmacy model demonstrated inventory savings compared with conventional site-based distribution. Biological sample collection for HbA1c assessment was done through drop-off, which proved more challenging in the remote arm. Key challenges related to DCT logistics as experienced in RADIAL included unclear importer/exporter responsibilities, regulatory divergence across countries, participant material management, and sample drop-off reliability. DtP IMP delivery and biological sample collection are feasible in European DCTs but require enhanced planning, clear vendor responsibilities, and robust contingency procedures. Success depends on appropriate participant training, reliable courier services, temperature control systems, and accessible biological sample collection methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Supply of Investigational Medicinal Product and Management of Study Materials for Decentralized Participants-Insights from the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof-of-Concept Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Megan Heath, Amos J de Jong, Shaun Magorrian-Spence, Chao Jin, Danny R van Weelij, Lucas Pagnier, Yvonne van Rijswick, Volker Haufe, Bart Lagerwaard, Mira G P Zuidgeest\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.70072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs), which move trial activities to participants' homes or direct surroundings, offer potential advantages over conventional site-based trials through reduced participant burden and improved accessibility. The direct-to-participant (DtP) delivery of investigational medicinal products (IMPs) and other study materials and collection of biological samples requires careful planning and execution to ensure participant safety and data integrity. Here, we report operational experiences from the RADIAL proof-of-concept trial, a three-arm parallel-group study conducted across six European countries comparing conventional, hybrid, and fully decentralized approaches in type 2 diabetes patients. The study implemented two DtP IMP models: clinical trial site-to-participant and central pharmacy-to-participant delivery, with comprehensive logistics tracking and temperature monitoring. In RADIAL, 68 DtP IMP shipments were executed with a 94% successful delivery rate. Four shipments (6%) failed due to participant unavailability, temperature excursions, defective monitoring equipment, or courier loss. The central pharmacy model demonstrated inventory savings compared with conventional site-based distribution. Biological sample collection for HbA1c assessment was done through drop-off, which proved more challenging in the remote arm. Key challenges related to DCT logistics as experienced in RADIAL included unclear importer/exporter responsibilities, regulatory divergence across countries, participant material management, and sample drop-off reliability. DtP IMP delivery and biological sample collection are feasible in European DCTs but require enhanced planning, clear vendor responsibilities, and robust contingency procedures. Success depends on appropriate participant training, reliable courier services, temperature control systems, and accessible biological sample collection methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70072\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分散临床试验(dct)将试验活动转移到参与者家中或直接的环境中,通过减轻参与者负担和提高可及性,与传统的现场试验相比,具有潜在的优势。临床试验药品(imp)和其他研究材料的直接面向参与者(DtP)交付以及生物样本的收集需要仔细的规划和执行,以确保参与者的安全和数据的完整性。在这里,我们报告了RADIAL概念验证试验的操作经验,这是一项在六个欧洲国家进行的三组平行研究,比较了传统、混合和完全分散的方法在2型糖尿病患者中的应用。该研究实施了两种DtP IMP模型:临床试验地点到参与者和中央药物到参与者的交付,具有全面的物流跟踪和温度监测。在RADIAL,执行了68次DtP IMP发货,成功率为94%。4次发货(6%)由于参与者不可用、温度偏差、监控设备缺陷或快递丢失而失败。与传统的基于站点的分销相比,中心药房模式显示了库存节省。HbA1c评估的生物样本采集是通过送药的方式完成的,这在远程臂中更具挑战性。根据radia的经验,与DCT物流相关的主要挑战包括不明确的进口商/出口商责任、各国监管差异、参与者材料管理和样品交付可靠性。DtP IMP交付和生物样本收集在欧洲dct中是可行的,但需要加强计划、明确供应商责任和健全的应急程序。成功取决于适当的参与者培训、可靠的快递服务、温度控制系统和可获得的生物样本收集方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Supply of Investigational Medicinal Product and Management of Study Materials for Decentralized Participants-Insights from the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof-of-Concept Trial.

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs), which move trial activities to participants' homes or direct surroundings, offer potential advantages over conventional site-based trials through reduced participant burden and improved accessibility. The direct-to-participant (DtP) delivery of investigational medicinal products (IMPs) and other study materials and collection of biological samples requires careful planning and execution to ensure participant safety and data integrity. Here, we report operational experiences from the RADIAL proof-of-concept trial, a three-arm parallel-group study conducted across six European countries comparing conventional, hybrid, and fully decentralized approaches in type 2 diabetes patients. The study implemented two DtP IMP models: clinical trial site-to-participant and central pharmacy-to-participant delivery, with comprehensive logistics tracking and temperature monitoring. In RADIAL, 68 DtP IMP shipments were executed with a 94% successful delivery rate. Four shipments (6%) failed due to participant unavailability, temperature excursions, defective monitoring equipment, or courier loss. The central pharmacy model demonstrated inventory savings compared with conventional site-based distribution. Biological sample collection for HbA1c assessment was done through drop-off, which proved more challenging in the remote arm. Key challenges related to DCT logistics as experienced in RADIAL included unclear importer/exporter responsibilities, regulatory divergence across countries, participant material management, and sample drop-off reliability. DtP IMP delivery and biological sample collection are feasible in European DCTs but require enhanced planning, clear vendor responsibilities, and robust contingency procedures. Success depends on appropriate participant training, reliable courier services, temperature control systems, and accessible biological sample collection methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信