解析输运方程参数估计的研究2

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 WATER RESOURCES
Andrew Mills
{"title":"解析输运方程参数估计的研究2","authors":"Andrew Mills","doi":"10.1111/gwmr.12723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Three new applications are presented to perform parameter estimation to assist in the calibration of a model based on Wexler's equation for his PATCHI three-dimensional analytical transport program. These join the analogous programs presented recently in this journal based on the Domenico equation. Because the Wexler equation involves the numerical evaluation of the integral of the solution to the partial differential equation for advective–dispersive solute transport, it is much more accurate than the Domenico equation, which omits the necessary numerical evaluation and is a closed-form expression. As in the “sister” paper, one of the applications studied is a quasi-exhaustive search method and the second is a successive parameter variation method. The third program is based on Box's Complex nonlinear, direct-search optimization method. The three programs and an already available calibration tool (PEST) were compared in tests using data from two different sites in southeastern Pennsylvania. These tests demonstrated the validity of the three programs for assisting the calibration of a groundwater analytical transport model based on the Wexler equation. The final estimates for the parameter values for the three methods and PEST applied to the data from each of the two sites compared reasonably closely. The three newly available programs individually should serve as calibrating tools of value for field hydrogeologists, environmental project managers, and others who have been asked to run the Wexler transport model (PATCHI). The results from the runs performed on the two sites indicate the Complex method to be the best option as a calibration tool, with the quasi-exhaustive search and the successive parameter estimation method being acceptable alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":55081,"journal":{"name":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","volume":"45 3","pages":"50-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studies in Parameter Estimation for Analytical Transport Equations II\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Mills\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwmr.12723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Three new applications are presented to perform parameter estimation to assist in the calibration of a model based on Wexler's equation for his PATCHI three-dimensional analytical transport program. These join the analogous programs presented recently in this journal based on the Domenico equation. Because the Wexler equation involves the numerical evaluation of the integral of the solution to the partial differential equation for advective–dispersive solute transport, it is much more accurate than the Domenico equation, which omits the necessary numerical evaluation and is a closed-form expression. As in the “sister” paper, one of the applications studied is a quasi-exhaustive search method and the second is a successive parameter variation method. The third program is based on Box's Complex nonlinear, direct-search optimization method. The three programs and an already available calibration tool (PEST) were compared in tests using data from two different sites in southeastern Pennsylvania. These tests demonstrated the validity of the three programs for assisting the calibration of a groundwater analytical transport model based on the Wexler equation. The final estimates for the parameter values for the three methods and PEST applied to the data from each of the two sites compared reasonably closely. The three newly available programs individually should serve as calibrating tools of value for field hydrogeologists, environmental project managers, and others who have been asked to run the Wexler transport model (PATCHI). The results from the runs performed on the two sites indicate the Complex method to be the best option as a calibration tool, with the quasi-exhaustive search and the successive parameter estimation method being acceptable alternatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"50-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwmr.12723\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwmr.12723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了三个新的应用程序来执行参数估计,以协助校正基于韦克斯勒方程的模型,为他的PATCHI三维解析输运程序。这些加入了最近在本杂志上基于多梅尼科方程提出的类似程序。由于Wexler方程涉及到对递进色散溶质输运偏微分方程解的积分进行数值计算,因此它比省略了必要数值计算的Domenico方程要精确得多,后者是一种封闭形式的表达式。与姊妹论文一样,本文研究的一种应用是准穷举搜索法,另一种应用是参数逐次变分法。第三个方案是基于Box的复杂非线性直接搜索优化方法。三个程序和一个已经可用的校准工具(PEST)在测试中使用来自宾夕法尼亚州东南部两个不同地点的数据进行比较。这些试验证明了这三个程序对基于韦克斯勒方程的地下水分析输运模型的辅助定标的有效性。三种方法的参数值的最终估计值和应用于两个站点的每一个数据的PEST比较相当接近。这三个新推出的程序应该分别作为现场水文地质学家、环境项目经理和其他被要求运行韦克斯勒输送模型(PATCHI)的人的有价值的校准工具。在两个地点进行的运行结果表明,复合方法是作为校准工具的最佳选择,准穷举搜索和连续参数估计方法是可接受的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Studies in Parameter Estimation for Analytical Transport Equations II

Studies in Parameter Estimation for Analytical Transport Equations II

Studies in Parameter Estimation for Analytical Transport Equations II

Studies in Parameter Estimation for Analytical Transport Equations II

Studies in Parameter Estimation for Analytical Transport Equations II

Three new applications are presented to perform parameter estimation to assist in the calibration of a model based on Wexler's equation for his PATCHI three-dimensional analytical transport program. These join the analogous programs presented recently in this journal based on the Domenico equation. Because the Wexler equation involves the numerical evaluation of the integral of the solution to the partial differential equation for advective–dispersive solute transport, it is much more accurate than the Domenico equation, which omits the necessary numerical evaluation and is a closed-form expression. As in the “sister” paper, one of the applications studied is a quasi-exhaustive search method and the second is a successive parameter variation method. The third program is based on Box's Complex nonlinear, direct-search optimization method. The three programs and an already available calibration tool (PEST) were compared in tests using data from two different sites in southeastern Pennsylvania. These tests demonstrated the validity of the three programs for assisting the calibration of a groundwater analytical transport model based on the Wexler equation. The final estimates for the parameter values for the three methods and PEST applied to the data from each of the two sites compared reasonably closely. The three newly available programs individually should serve as calibrating tools of value for field hydrogeologists, environmental project managers, and others who have been asked to run the Wexler transport model (PATCHI). The results from the runs performed on the two sites indicate the Complex method to be the best option as a calibration tool, with the quasi-exhaustive search and the successive parameter estimation method being acceptable alternatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1981, Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation® has been a resource for researchers and practitioners in the field. It is a quarterly journal that offers the best in application oriented, peer-reviewed papers together with insightful articles from the practitioner''s perspective. Each issue features papers containing cutting-edge information on treatment technology, columns by industry experts, news briefs, and equipment news. GWMR plays a unique role in advancing the practice of the groundwater monitoring and remediation field by providing forward-thinking research with practical solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信