Juan Carlos Archila-Godínez, Claudia Kotanko, Renee Wiatt, Maria I. Marshall, Yaohua Feng
{"title":"消费者对中小农场农产品的食品安全期望与风险认知","authors":"Juan Carlos Archila-Godínez, Claudia Kotanko, Renee Wiatt, Maria I. Marshall, Yaohua Feng","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Food safety concerns associated with fresh produce have gained prominence due to recurring foodborne outbreaks and recalls. However, consumer awareness and perceptions regarding food safety in small and medium-sized farm (SMF) operations remain underexplored. This study assessed consumer expectations and risk perceptions of produce from SMFs through a survey of 916 U.S. consumers. While 85% of respondents considered food safety a minimum quality standard, it was often viewed as secondary to attributes such as freshness, quality, and local production. Most higher-income consumers (63%) opposed the exemption of SMFs from the Food Safety Modernization Act's Produce Safety Rule. Consumers identified farmers as key actors in ensuring produce safety, with 75% rating them as extremely influential in maintaining food safety. Additionally, 47% of respondents attributed responsibility to farmers when presented with a hypothetical foodborne outbreak scenario, while a majority believed all commercially sold food should be safe regardless of farm size. Structured equation modeling revealed the interrelationships among constructs, including demographic characteristics, produce handling practices, food safety knowledge, expectation of food safety as a minimum quality standard, perceptions of produce from SMFs, and perceptions of food safety standards for SMFs. These findings provide insight into consumer attitudes toward produce safety and regulatory expectations for SMFs. The results suggest that consumers expect food safety to be an inherent characteristic of fresh produce, yet their perceptions of risk and responsibility are shaped by broader considerations of food quality, sourcing, and trust in agricultural producers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70527","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumers’ Food Safety Expectations and Risk Perceptions of Produce From Small and Medium-Sized Farms\",\"authors\":\"Juan Carlos Archila-Godínez, Claudia Kotanko, Renee Wiatt, Maria I. Marshall, Yaohua Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Food safety concerns associated with fresh produce have gained prominence due to recurring foodborne outbreaks and recalls. However, consumer awareness and perceptions regarding food safety in small and medium-sized farm (SMF) operations remain underexplored. This study assessed consumer expectations and risk perceptions of produce from SMFs through a survey of 916 U.S. consumers. While 85% of respondents considered food safety a minimum quality standard, it was often viewed as secondary to attributes such as freshness, quality, and local production. Most higher-income consumers (63%) opposed the exemption of SMFs from the Food Safety Modernization Act's Produce Safety Rule. Consumers identified farmers as key actors in ensuring produce safety, with 75% rating them as extremely influential in maintaining food safety. Additionally, 47% of respondents attributed responsibility to farmers when presented with a hypothetical foodborne outbreak scenario, while a majority believed all commercially sold food should be safe regardless of farm size. Structured equation modeling revealed the interrelationships among constructs, including demographic characteristics, produce handling practices, food safety knowledge, expectation of food safety as a minimum quality standard, perceptions of produce from SMFs, and perceptions of food safety standards for SMFs. These findings provide insight into consumer attitudes toward produce safety and regulatory expectations for SMFs. The results suggest that consumers expect food safety to be an inherent characteristic of fresh produce, yet their perceptions of risk and responsibility are shaped by broader considerations of food quality, sourcing, and trust in agricultural producers.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70527\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70527\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70527","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consumers’ Food Safety Expectations and Risk Perceptions of Produce From Small and Medium-Sized Farms
Food safety concerns associated with fresh produce have gained prominence due to recurring foodborne outbreaks and recalls. However, consumer awareness and perceptions regarding food safety in small and medium-sized farm (SMF) operations remain underexplored. This study assessed consumer expectations and risk perceptions of produce from SMFs through a survey of 916 U.S. consumers. While 85% of respondents considered food safety a minimum quality standard, it was often viewed as secondary to attributes such as freshness, quality, and local production. Most higher-income consumers (63%) opposed the exemption of SMFs from the Food Safety Modernization Act's Produce Safety Rule. Consumers identified farmers as key actors in ensuring produce safety, with 75% rating them as extremely influential in maintaining food safety. Additionally, 47% of respondents attributed responsibility to farmers when presented with a hypothetical foodborne outbreak scenario, while a majority believed all commercially sold food should be safe regardless of farm size. Structured equation modeling revealed the interrelationships among constructs, including demographic characteristics, produce handling practices, food safety knowledge, expectation of food safety as a minimum quality standard, perceptions of produce from SMFs, and perceptions of food safety standards for SMFs. These findings provide insight into consumer attitudes toward produce safety and regulatory expectations for SMFs. The results suggest that consumers expect food safety to be an inherent characteristic of fresh produce, yet their perceptions of risk and responsibility are shaped by broader considerations of food quality, sourcing, and trust in agricultural producers.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science.
The range of topics covered in the journal include:
-Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science
-New Horizons in Food Research
-Integrated Food Science
-Food Chemistry
-Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology
-Food Microbiology and Safety
-Sensory and Consumer Sciences
-Health, Nutrition, and Food
-Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety
The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.