{"title":"olaparib, durvalumab和fulvestrant联合治疗晚期ER+/HER2-乳腺癌患者和选择的基因组改变:DOLAF试验的结果","authors":"Séverine Guiu,Judith Balmaña,Pablo Lemercier,Philippe Follana,Anthony Gonçalves,Frédéric Bigot,Jean-Sebastien Frenel,Etienne Brain,Audrey Mailliez,Camille Chakiba Brugere,Elsa Curtit,Olfa Derbel,Florence Dalenc,Fanny Derquin,Francois Duhoux,Jean-Luc Canon,Isabel Pimentel,Louise Marie Chevalier,Adrien Buisson,Clara Guyonneau,Jérôme Lemonnier,Suzette Delaloge,Thomas Bachelot","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-4221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nPrevious data suggest synergy between PARP inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade in different genetic settings. The estrogen receptor (ER) pathway remains a key target in metastatic breast cancer whatever the genomic context. This study assess the activity of the combination of PARP, ER, and PDL1 inhibition among patients with metastatic breast cancer and relevant genomic alterations.\r\n\r\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\r\nIn this multicenter single arm phase II clinical trial, we used a Simon's two-stage design to evaluate the activity and safety of a combination of durvalumab, olaparib and fulvestrant as second- or third-line in patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Patients with either somatic or germline mutations of an HRR-gene, an MSI status or an endocrine resistance-related mutation were eligible. Primary endpoint was 24-week progression-free survival rate (PFSR).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe 172 (100%) patients included received prior endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer, 86% a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and 67 (39%) had a previously documented gBRCA1/2m. The 24-week PFSR was 66.7% (95% CI: 58.6-74.1) in the evaluable population and 76.3% (95% CI: 63.4-86.4) in gBRCA1/2m patients. Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 7.5-12.7) and 12.6 months (95% CI: 8.2-16.7) in the ITT and gBRCA1/2m populations, respectively. Median OS was 30 months (95% CI: 26.6-NR). Most common adverse events of any grade were nausea (59%) and asthenia (43%). No new toxicity warning was detected.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIn patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer and selected genomic alterations, this triplet combination was active and had an acceptable toxicity profile (NCT04053322).","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of olaparib, durvalumab and fulvestrant in patients with advanced ER+/HER2- breast cancer and selected genomic alterations: results of the DOLAF trial.\",\"authors\":\"Séverine Guiu,Judith Balmaña,Pablo Lemercier,Philippe Follana,Anthony Gonçalves,Frédéric Bigot,Jean-Sebastien Frenel,Etienne Brain,Audrey Mailliez,Camille Chakiba Brugere,Elsa Curtit,Olfa Derbel,Florence Dalenc,Fanny Derquin,Francois Duhoux,Jean-Luc Canon,Isabel Pimentel,Louise Marie Chevalier,Adrien Buisson,Clara Guyonneau,Jérôme Lemonnier,Suzette Delaloge,Thomas Bachelot\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-4221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nPrevious data suggest synergy between PARP inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade in different genetic settings. The estrogen receptor (ER) pathway remains a key target in metastatic breast cancer whatever the genomic context. This study assess the activity of the combination of PARP, ER, and PDL1 inhibition among patients with metastatic breast cancer and relevant genomic alterations.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\\r\\nIn this multicenter single arm phase II clinical trial, we used a Simon's two-stage design to evaluate the activity and safety of a combination of durvalumab, olaparib and fulvestrant as second- or third-line in patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Patients with either somatic or germline mutations of an HRR-gene, an MSI status or an endocrine resistance-related mutation were eligible. Primary endpoint was 24-week progression-free survival rate (PFSR).\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe 172 (100%) patients included received prior endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer, 86% a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and 67 (39%) had a previously documented gBRCA1/2m. The 24-week PFSR was 66.7% (95% CI: 58.6-74.1) in the evaluable population and 76.3% (95% CI: 63.4-86.4) in gBRCA1/2m patients. Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 7.5-12.7) and 12.6 months (95% CI: 8.2-16.7) in the ITT and gBRCA1/2m populations, respectively. Median OS was 30 months (95% CI: 26.6-NR). Most common adverse events of any grade were nausea (59%) and asthenia (43%). No new toxicity warning was detected.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nIn patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer and selected genomic alterations, this triplet combination was active and had an acceptable toxicity profile (NCT04053322).\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-4221\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-4221","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combination of olaparib, durvalumab and fulvestrant in patients with advanced ER+/HER2- breast cancer and selected genomic alterations: results of the DOLAF trial.
PURPOSE
Previous data suggest synergy between PARP inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade in different genetic settings. The estrogen receptor (ER) pathway remains a key target in metastatic breast cancer whatever the genomic context. This study assess the activity of the combination of PARP, ER, and PDL1 inhibition among patients with metastatic breast cancer and relevant genomic alterations.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
In this multicenter single arm phase II clinical trial, we used a Simon's two-stage design to evaluate the activity and safety of a combination of durvalumab, olaparib and fulvestrant as second- or third-line in patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Patients with either somatic or germline mutations of an HRR-gene, an MSI status or an endocrine resistance-related mutation were eligible. Primary endpoint was 24-week progression-free survival rate (PFSR).
RESULTS
The 172 (100%) patients included received prior endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer, 86% a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and 67 (39%) had a previously documented gBRCA1/2m. The 24-week PFSR was 66.7% (95% CI: 58.6-74.1) in the evaluable population and 76.3% (95% CI: 63.4-86.4) in gBRCA1/2m patients. Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 7.5-12.7) and 12.6 months (95% CI: 8.2-16.7) in the ITT and gBRCA1/2m populations, respectively. Median OS was 30 months (95% CI: 26.6-NR). Most common adverse events of any grade were nausea (59%) and asthenia (43%). No new toxicity warning was detected.
CONCLUSION
In patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer and selected genomic alterations, this triplet combination was active and had an acceptable toxicity profile (NCT04053322).
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.