人工智能增强手持式乳腺超声筛查:诊断测试准确性的系统回顾。

IF 7.7
PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001019
Arianna Bunnell, Dustin Valdez, Fredrik Strand, Yannik Glaser, Peter Sadowski, John A Shepherd
{"title":"人工智能增强手持式乳腺超声筛查:诊断测试准确性的系统回顾。","authors":"Arianna Bunnell, Dustin Valdez, Fredrik Strand, Yannik Glaser, Peter Sadowski, John A Shepherd","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0001019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer screening programs using mammography have led to significant mortality reduction in high-income countries. However, many low- and middle-income countries lack resources for mammographic screening. Handheld breast ultrasound (BUS) is a low-cost alternative but requires substantial training. Artificial intelligence (AI) enabled BUS may aid in both the detection and classification of breast cancer, enabling screening use in low-resource contexts. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate whether AI-enhanced BUS is sufficiently accurate to serve as the primary modality in screening, particularly in resource-limited environments. This review (CRD42023493053) is reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Evidence synthesis is reported in accordance with the SWiM (Synthesis Without Meta-analysis) guidelines. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched from January 1, 2016 to December 12, 2023. Studies are grouped according to AI task and assessed for quality. Of 763 candidate studies, 314 full texts were reviewed and 34 studies are included. The AI tasks of included studies are as follows: 1 frame selection, 6 lesion detection, 11 segmentation, and 16 classification. 79% of studies were at high or unclear risk of bias. Exemplary classification and segmentation AI systems perform with 0.976 AUROC and 0.838 Dice similarity coefficient. There has been encouraging development of AI for BUS. However, despite studies demonstrating high performance, substantial further research is required to validate reported performance in real-world screening programs. High-quality model validation on geographically external, screening datasets will be key to realizing the potential for AI-enhanced BUS in increasing screening access in resource-limited environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 9","pages":"e0001019"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-enhanced handheld breast ultrasound for screening: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Arianna Bunnell, Dustin Valdez, Fredrik Strand, Yannik Glaser, Peter Sadowski, John A Shepherd\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0001019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Breast cancer screening programs using mammography have led to significant mortality reduction in high-income countries. However, many low- and middle-income countries lack resources for mammographic screening. Handheld breast ultrasound (BUS) is a low-cost alternative but requires substantial training. Artificial intelligence (AI) enabled BUS may aid in both the detection and classification of breast cancer, enabling screening use in low-resource contexts. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate whether AI-enhanced BUS is sufficiently accurate to serve as the primary modality in screening, particularly in resource-limited environments. This review (CRD42023493053) is reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Evidence synthesis is reported in accordance with the SWiM (Synthesis Without Meta-analysis) guidelines. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched from January 1, 2016 to December 12, 2023. Studies are grouped according to AI task and assessed for quality. Of 763 candidate studies, 314 full texts were reviewed and 34 studies are included. The AI tasks of included studies are as follows: 1 frame selection, 6 lesion detection, 11 segmentation, and 16 classification. 79% of studies were at high or unclear risk of bias. Exemplary classification and segmentation AI systems perform with 0.976 AUROC and 0.838 Dice similarity coefficient. There has been encouraging development of AI for BUS. However, despite studies demonstrating high performance, substantial further research is required to validate reported performance in real-world screening programs. High-quality model validation on geographically external, screening datasets will be key to realizing the potential for AI-enhanced BUS in increasing screening access in resource-limited environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 9\",\"pages\":\"e0001019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在高收入国家,使用乳房x光检查的乳腺癌筛查项目显著降低了死亡率。然而,许多低收入和中等收入国家缺乏进行乳房x光检查的资源。手持式乳房超声(BUS)是一种低成本的替代方法,但需要大量的培训。人工智能(AI)支持的BUS可能有助于乳腺癌的检测和分类,使筛查在资源匮乏的情况下使用。本系统综述的目的是调查人工智能增强的BUS是否足够准确,可以作为筛查的主要方式,特别是在资源有限的环境中。本综述(CRD42023493053)按照PRISMA指南报告。证据综合根据SWiM(综合无荟萃分析)指南进行报告。PubMed和谷歌Scholar的检索时间为2016年1月1日至2023年12月12日。根据人工智能任务对研究进行分组,并评估其质量。在763项候选研究中,314篇全文被审查,34项研究被纳入。纳入研究的AI任务如下:1个帧选择,6个病灶检测,11个分割,16个分类。79%的研究存在高偏倚风险或不明确偏倚风险。示例性分类和分割AI系统的AUROC系数为0.976,Dice相似系数为0.838。总线人工智能的发展令人鼓舞。然而,尽管研究显示了高性能,但需要大量进一步的研究来验证在现实世界筛选程序中报告的性能。在地理外部筛选数据集上进行高质量的模型验证将是实现人工智能增强的BUS在资源有限环境中增加筛选访问的潜力的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artificial intelligence-enhanced handheld breast ultrasound for screening: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy.

Artificial intelligence-enhanced handheld breast ultrasound for screening: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy.

Artificial intelligence-enhanced handheld breast ultrasound for screening: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy.

Artificial intelligence-enhanced handheld breast ultrasound for screening: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy.

Breast cancer screening programs using mammography have led to significant mortality reduction in high-income countries. However, many low- and middle-income countries lack resources for mammographic screening. Handheld breast ultrasound (BUS) is a low-cost alternative but requires substantial training. Artificial intelligence (AI) enabled BUS may aid in both the detection and classification of breast cancer, enabling screening use in low-resource contexts. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate whether AI-enhanced BUS is sufficiently accurate to serve as the primary modality in screening, particularly in resource-limited environments. This review (CRD42023493053) is reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Evidence synthesis is reported in accordance with the SWiM (Synthesis Without Meta-analysis) guidelines. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched from January 1, 2016 to December 12, 2023. Studies are grouped according to AI task and assessed for quality. Of 763 candidate studies, 314 full texts were reviewed and 34 studies are included. The AI tasks of included studies are as follows: 1 frame selection, 6 lesion detection, 11 segmentation, and 16 classification. 79% of studies were at high or unclear risk of bias. Exemplary classification and segmentation AI systems perform with 0.976 AUROC and 0.838 Dice similarity coefficient. There has been encouraging development of AI for BUS. However, despite studies demonstrating high performance, substantial further research is required to validate reported performance in real-world screening programs. High-quality model validation on geographically external, screening datasets will be key to realizing the potential for AI-enhanced BUS in increasing screening access in resource-limited environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信