心脏手术中胸肋间筋膜平面阻滞伴或不伴直肌鞘阻滞:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲安慰剂对照研究。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anne L Castro, Hemanckur Makker, Laura S Gonzalez, Audrey Jensen, Sergey S Tarima, Adam Pagryzinski, Rozalin Thapa, Ali Qureshi, Christopher Fadumiye, Krystal Weierstahl, Paul Pearson, Julie K Freed
{"title":"心脏手术中胸肋间筋膜平面阻滞伴或不伴直肌鞘阻滞:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲安慰剂对照研究。","authors":"Anne L Castro, Hemanckur Makker, Laura S Gonzalez, Audrey Jensen, Sergey S Tarima, Adam Pagryzinski, Rozalin Thapa, Ali Qureshi, Christopher Fadumiye, Krystal Weierstahl, Paul Pearson, Julie K Freed","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Median sternotomy and chest tube sites drive pain following cardiac surgery. Prior research has demonstrated that pecto-intercostal fascial plane blocks (PIFBs) reduce median sternotomy pain after cardiac surgery. Prior studies examining the addition of a rectus sheath block (RSB) to localize the insertion site of subxiphoid chest tubes have had mixed results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 62 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy and subxiphoid chest tubes were randomized to receive PIFB and RSB with local anesthetic versus PIFB with local anesthetic and RSB with saline placebo. The primary outcome was pain at rest and with deep breathing in the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours, performance on incentive spirometry in the first 24 hours, time to extubation, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and Quality of Recovery-15 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between groups for the primary outcome, with mean area under the curve (AUC) for pain at rest in the first 24 hours 93.37±41.38 (sample mean±sample SD) in the placebo group versus 86.11±42.78 in the bupivacaine group (p=0.51), and mean AUC for pain with deep breathing 135.55±43.74 in the placebo group versus 128.78±47.08 in the bupivacaine group (p=0.57). There were no differences in secondary outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding bilateral RSB to bilateral PIFB did not improve pain control or other outcomes for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pecto-intercostal fascial plane block with or without rectus sheath block in cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Anne L Castro, Hemanckur Makker, Laura S Gonzalez, Audrey Jensen, Sergey S Tarima, Adam Pagryzinski, Rozalin Thapa, Ali Qureshi, Christopher Fadumiye, Krystal Weierstahl, Paul Pearson, Julie K Freed\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2025-106954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Median sternotomy and chest tube sites drive pain following cardiac surgery. Prior research has demonstrated that pecto-intercostal fascial plane blocks (PIFBs) reduce median sternotomy pain after cardiac surgery. Prior studies examining the addition of a rectus sheath block (RSB) to localize the insertion site of subxiphoid chest tubes have had mixed results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 62 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy and subxiphoid chest tubes were randomized to receive PIFB and RSB with local anesthetic versus PIFB with local anesthetic and RSB with saline placebo. The primary outcome was pain at rest and with deep breathing in the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours, performance on incentive spirometry in the first 24 hours, time to extubation, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and Quality of Recovery-15 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between groups for the primary outcome, with mean area under the curve (AUC) for pain at rest in the first 24 hours 93.37±41.38 (sample mean±sample SD) in the placebo group versus 86.11±42.78 in the bupivacaine group (p=0.51), and mean AUC for pain with deep breathing 135.55±43.74 in the placebo group versus 128.78±47.08 in the bupivacaine group (p=0.57). There were no differences in secondary outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding bilateral RSB to bilateral PIFB did not improve pain control or other outcomes for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106954\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106954","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸骨正中切开术和胸管部位引起心脏手术后疼痛。先前的研究表明,胸肋间筋膜平面阻滞(PIFBs)可减轻心脏手术后胸骨切开术中位疼痛。先前的研究检查了添加直肌鞘块(RSB)来定位剑突下胸管的插入位置,结果好坏参半。方法:在这项单中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,62例接受胸骨正中切口和剑突下胸管心脏手术的患者被随机分为PIFB和RSB加局麻组与PIFB加局麻和RSB加生理盐水安慰剂组。主要结果是术后24小时内休息时疼痛和深呼吸。次要结局包括24小时和48小时阿片类药物总消耗量、前24小时激励肺活量测定的表现、拔管时间、住院和重症监护病房住院时间以及康复质量-15评分。结果:两组间主要结局无统计学差异,安慰剂组前24小时静息疼痛的平均曲线下面积(AUC)为93.37±41.38(样本均值±样本SD),布比卡因组为86.11±42.78 (p=0.51);深呼吸疼痛的平均AUC为135.55±43.74,布比卡因组为128.78±47.08 (p=0.57)。两组间的次要结局无差异。结论:在双侧PIFB中加入双侧RSB并不能改善心脏手术患者的疼痛控制或其他结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pecto-intercostal fascial plane block with or without rectus sheath block in cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Background: Median sternotomy and chest tube sites drive pain following cardiac surgery. Prior research has demonstrated that pecto-intercostal fascial plane blocks (PIFBs) reduce median sternotomy pain after cardiac surgery. Prior studies examining the addition of a rectus sheath block (RSB) to localize the insertion site of subxiphoid chest tubes have had mixed results.

Methods: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 62 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy and subxiphoid chest tubes were randomized to receive PIFB and RSB with local anesthetic versus PIFB with local anesthetic and RSB with saline placebo. The primary outcome was pain at rest and with deep breathing in the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours, performance on incentive spirometry in the first 24 hours, time to extubation, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and Quality of Recovery-15 score.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between groups for the primary outcome, with mean area under the curve (AUC) for pain at rest in the first 24 hours 93.37±41.38 (sample mean±sample SD) in the placebo group versus 86.11±42.78 in the bupivacaine group (p=0.51), and mean AUC for pain with deep breathing 135.55±43.74 in the placebo group versus 128.78±47.08 in the bupivacaine group (p=0.57). There were no differences in secondary outcomes between groups.

Conclusions: Adding bilateral RSB to bilateral PIFB did not improve pain control or other outcomes for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信