加拿大艾伯塔省家庭医生随时间的变化:一项为期16年的人群队列研究。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Braden J Manns, Terrence McDonald, Kerry McBrien, Aaron Johnston, Lee Green, Flora Au, Marcello Tonelli
{"title":"加拿大艾伯塔省家庭医生随时间的变化:一项为期16年的人群队列研究。","authors":"Braden J Manns, Terrence McDonald, Kerry McBrien, Aaron Johnston, Lee Green, Flora Au, Marcello Tonelli","doi":"10.1370/afm.240514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Most studies evaluating access to primary care have focused on changes in family physicians (FPs), with less exploration of patient differences over time. We examined both physicians and patients, including changes over time in the age and medical complexity of people seeing FPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based cohort study using administrative health data, including physician claims and hospital data, examining patients cared for by FPs providing comprehensive primary care from 2004 to 2020 in Alberta, Canada. We assessed changes in FPs and used validated algorithms to examine changes in comorbidity among adults cared for by those physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were notable changes in FPs over time including more physicians who were women (46.7% in 2020 vs 39% in 2004; <i>P</i> < .001) and trained in low/middle-income countries (17.2% vs 6.3%; <i>P</i> < .001). Patient age and number of comorbidities increased over time. The proportion aged 61-80 years increased from 16.1% in 2004 to 22.1% in 2020 (<i>P</i> < .001). Those with ≥5 comorbid conditions increased from 2.8% to 5.2% (<i>P</i> < .001). There were changes in physician practice over time including decreases in average days worked each year (167 in 2004, 156 in 2020; <i>P</i> = .007) and number of adult patients seen each day (23 vs 20; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From 2004 to 2020, there were substantial changes in the characteristics and practices of FPs. In addition, there were notable trends in the characteristics of their patients, including an increasing proportion of older adults, often with more complex comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":"23 5","pages":"419-426"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Family Physicians Over Time in Alberta, Canada: A 16-Year Population-Based Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Braden J Manns, Terrence McDonald, Kerry McBrien, Aaron Johnston, Lee Green, Flora Au, Marcello Tonelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1370/afm.240514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Most studies evaluating access to primary care have focused on changes in family physicians (FPs), with less exploration of patient differences over time. We examined both physicians and patients, including changes over time in the age and medical complexity of people seeing FPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based cohort study using administrative health data, including physician claims and hospital data, examining patients cared for by FPs providing comprehensive primary care from 2004 to 2020 in Alberta, Canada. We assessed changes in FPs and used validated algorithms to examine changes in comorbidity among adults cared for by those physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were notable changes in FPs over time including more physicians who were women (46.7% in 2020 vs 39% in 2004; <i>P</i> < .001) and trained in low/middle-income countries (17.2% vs 6.3%; <i>P</i> < .001). Patient age and number of comorbidities increased over time. The proportion aged 61-80 years increased from 16.1% in 2004 to 22.1% in 2020 (<i>P</i> < .001). Those with ≥5 comorbid conditions increased from 2.8% to 5.2% (<i>P</i> < .001). There were changes in physician practice over time including decreases in average days worked each year (167 in 2004, 156 in 2020; <i>P</i> = .007) and number of adult patients seen each day (23 vs 20; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From 2004 to 2020, there were substantial changes in the characteristics and practices of FPs. In addition, there were notable trends in the characteristics of their patients, including an increasing proportion of older adults, often with more complex comorbidities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 5\",\"pages\":\"419-426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459692/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.240514\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.240514","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大多数评估初级保健可及性的研究都集中在家庭医生(FPs)的变化上,很少探索患者随时间的差异。我们检查了医生和患者,包括患者年龄和医疗复杂性随时间的变化。方法:我们进行了一项基于人群的队列研究,使用行政健康数据,包括医生索赔和医院数据,检查2004年至2020年在加拿大阿尔伯塔省由提供综合初级保健的FPs照顾的患者。我们评估了FPs的变化,并使用经过验证的算法来检查由这些医生护理的成人合并症的变化。结果:随着时间的推移,FPs发生了显著变化,包括更多的女性医生(2020年为46.7%,2004年为39%,P < 0.001)和中低收入国家的培训(17.2%,2004年为6.3%,P < 0.001)。患者的年龄和合并症的数量随着时间的推移而增加。61 ~ 80岁的比例从2004年的16.1%上升到2020年的22.1% (P < 0.001)。伴有≥5种合并症的患者从2.8%增加到5.2% (P < 0.001)。随着时间的推移,医生的实践发生了变化,包括每年平均工作天数的减少(2004年为167天,2020年为156天;P = 0.007)和每天看到的成年患者数量(23比20;P < 0.001)。结论:从2004年到2020年,FPs的特点和做法发生了实质性变化。此外,患者的特征也有显著的趋势,包括老年人比例的增加,通常伴有更复杂的合并症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in Family Physicians Over Time in Alberta, Canada: A 16-Year Population-Based Cohort Study.

Purpose: Most studies evaluating access to primary care have focused on changes in family physicians (FPs), with less exploration of patient differences over time. We examined both physicians and patients, including changes over time in the age and medical complexity of people seeing FPs.

Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using administrative health data, including physician claims and hospital data, examining patients cared for by FPs providing comprehensive primary care from 2004 to 2020 in Alberta, Canada. We assessed changes in FPs and used validated algorithms to examine changes in comorbidity among adults cared for by those physicians.

Results: There were notable changes in FPs over time including more physicians who were women (46.7% in 2020 vs 39% in 2004; P < .001) and trained in low/middle-income countries (17.2% vs 6.3%; P < .001). Patient age and number of comorbidities increased over time. The proportion aged 61-80 years increased from 16.1% in 2004 to 22.1% in 2020 (P < .001). Those with ≥5 comorbid conditions increased from 2.8% to 5.2% (P < .001). There were changes in physician practice over time including decreases in average days worked each year (167 in 2004, 156 in 2020; P = .007) and number of adult patients seen each day (23 vs 20; P < .001).

Conclusions: From 2004 to 2020, there were substantial changes in the characteristics and practices of FPs. In addition, there were notable trends in the characteristics of their patients, including an increasing proportion of older adults, often with more complex comorbidities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信