身体姿势对未训练的声音健康个体的音域轮廓表现的影响。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Ben Barsties v. Latoszek, Pia Droßard, Ferdinand Binkofski, Ewa v. Latoszek
{"title":"身体姿势对未训练的声音健康个体的音域轮廓表现的影响。","authors":"Ben Barsties v. Latoszek,&nbsp;Pia Droßard,&nbsp;Ferdinand Binkofski,&nbsp;Ewa v. Latoszek","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The voice range profile (VRP) is an acoustic measurement in vocal function voice assessment. While several factors influencing VRP outcomes are known, the impact of body posture during VRP recordings remains unexplored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the effects of standing and sitting posture on VRP performance in vocally healthy individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Procedures</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty vocally healthy and untrained participants were randomised into two groups. Group 1 performed VRP measurements first in a sitting position, followed by standing. Group 2 completed the tasks in reverse order. VRP parameters were compared between sitting and standing positions, and training effects between the first and second measurements were analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Outcomes and Results</h3>\n \n <p>No significant differences were found in any VRP parameter between sitting and standing positions (all <i>p</i> values &gt; 0.05), with nearly all effect sizes being very small or small. Furthermore, no training effect was observed among the two trials in each group (all <i>p</i> values &gt; 0.05, ICC &gt; 0.75, very small or small effect sizes).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Posture (sitting vs. standing) did not significantly influence VRP performance in the first instance when considering people without voice disorders. This might suggest flexibility in patient positioning during VRP assessments, potentially simplifying clinical protocols without compromising data integrity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <div><i>What is already known on this subject</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>Voice Range Profile (VRP) is a standard acoustic tool for assessing vocal function influenced by several factors such as recording methods, software, and patient characteristics. Though practical guidelines often recommend performing VRP assessments in a standing position, no empirical evidence has previously evaluated the effect of body posture on VRP outcomes. Thus, the clinical necessity of specific postural instructions during VRP remains unclear.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What this paper adds to the existing knowledge</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>This study is the first to investigate how body posture (sitting vs. standing) affects VRP performance in vocally healthy and untrained individuals. Using a randomised crossover design, it found no significant differences in any VRP parameter between sitting and standing conditions. Additionally, there was no observed training effect between repeated measurements, suggesting high test-retest reliability. These findings challenge the assumption that standing is superior for VRP assessments.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What are the potential or actual clinical implications for this work?</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>The results suggest that body posture may not substantially influence VRP outcomes in vocally healthy and untrained individuals. Therefore, conducting VRP assessments in either sitting or standing positions could be considered in certain clinical contexts, especially when accommodating patient needs. However, given the study's focus on healthy participants, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further research involving diverse populations, including individuals with voice disorders or specific postural conditions, is needed before recommending broader changes to clinical protocols.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Body Posture on Voice Range Profile Performance in Untrained Vocally Healthy Individuals\",\"authors\":\"Ben Barsties v. Latoszek,&nbsp;Pia Droßard,&nbsp;Ferdinand Binkofski,&nbsp;Ewa v. Latoszek\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1460-6984.70130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The voice range profile (VRP) is an acoustic measurement in vocal function voice assessment. While several factors influencing VRP outcomes are known, the impact of body posture during VRP recordings remains unexplored.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the effects of standing and sitting posture on VRP performance in vocally healthy individuals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and Procedures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty vocally healthy and untrained participants were randomised into two groups. Group 1 performed VRP measurements first in a sitting position, followed by standing. Group 2 completed the tasks in reverse order. VRP parameters were compared between sitting and standing positions, and training effects between the first and second measurements were analysed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Outcomes and Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>No significant differences were found in any VRP parameter between sitting and standing positions (all <i>p</i> values &gt; 0.05), with nearly all effect sizes being very small or small. Furthermore, no training effect was observed among the two trials in each group (all <i>p</i> values &gt; 0.05, ICC &gt; 0.75, very small or small effect sizes).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions and Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Posture (sitting vs. standing) did not significantly influence VRP performance in the first instance when considering people without voice disorders. This might suggest flexibility in patient positioning during VRP assessments, potentially simplifying clinical protocols without compromising data integrity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\\n \\n <div><i>What is already known on this subject</i>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Voice Range Profile (VRP) is a standard acoustic tool for assessing vocal function influenced by several factors such as recording methods, software, and patient characteristics. Though practical guidelines often recommend performing VRP assessments in a standing position, no empirical evidence has previously evaluated the effect of body posture on VRP outcomes. Thus, the clinical necessity of specific postural instructions during VRP remains unclear.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n \\n <div><i>What this paper adds to the existing knowledge</i>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>This study is the first to investigate how body posture (sitting vs. standing) affects VRP performance in vocally healthy and untrained individuals. Using a randomised crossover design, it found no significant differences in any VRP parameter between sitting and standing conditions. Additionally, there was no observed training effect between repeated measurements, suggesting high test-retest reliability. These findings challenge the assumption that standing is superior for VRP assessments.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n \\n <div><i>What are the potential or actual clinical implications for this work?</i>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>The results suggest that body posture may not substantially influence VRP outcomes in vocally healthy and untrained individuals. Therefore, conducting VRP assessments in either sitting or standing positions could be considered in certain clinical contexts, especially when accommodating patient needs. However, given the study's focus on healthy participants, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further research involving diverse populations, including individuals with voice disorders or specific postural conditions, is needed before recommending broader changes to clinical protocols.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"60 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456106/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70130\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:声音范围轮廓(VRP)是评价声音功能的一种声学测量方法。虽然有几个影响VRP结果的因素是已知的,但在VRP记录期间身体姿势的影响仍未被探索。目的:探讨站立和坐姿对发声健康个体VRP表现的影响。方法和程序:30名声音健康且未经训练的参与者随机分为两组。第一组首先在坐着的位置进行VRP测量,然后站着。第二组以相反的顺序完成任务。比较了坐姿和站立姿势的VRP参数,并分析了第一次和第二次测量的训练效果。结果与结果:坐位与站位之间的任何VRP参数均无显著差异(p值均为> 0.05),几乎所有效应量都非常小或很小。此外,在每组的两个试验中,没有观察到训练效应(p值均为> 0.05,ICC > 0.75,效应量很小或很小)。结论和意义:当考虑没有声音障碍的人时,姿势(坐着还是站着)首先对VRP的表现没有显著影响。这可能意味着在VRP评估期间患者位置的灵活性,可能简化临床方案而不影响数据完整性。本文补充的内容:在这个主题上已经知道的声音范围概况(VRP)是一个标准的声学工具,用于评估受录音方法,软件和患者特征等几个因素影响的声音功能。虽然实用指南经常建议在站立位置进行VRP评估,但之前没有经验证据评估身体姿势对VRP结果的影响。因此,在VRP过程中具体姿势指导的临床必要性尚不清楚。这项研究首次调查了身体姿势(坐与站)如何影响声音健康和未经训练的个体的VRP表现。使用随机交叉设计,研究发现坐着和站着的情况下,任何VRP参数都没有显著差异。此外,在重复测量之间没有观察到训练效应,表明高测试重测信度。这些发现挑战了站立对VRP评估更有利的假设。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?结果表明,身体姿势可能不会对声音健康和未经训练的个体的VRP结果产生实质性影响。因此,在某些临床情况下,特别是在满足患者需求的情况下,可以考虑以坐姿或站立姿势进行VRP评估。然而,考虑到这项研究的重点是健康的参与者,这些发现应该谨慎解释。在建议对临床方案进行更广泛的修改之前,需要对不同人群进行进一步的研究,包括患有声音障碍或特定姿势疾病的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of Body Posture on Voice Range Profile Performance in Untrained Vocally Healthy Individuals

Effects of Body Posture on Voice Range Profile Performance in Untrained Vocally Healthy Individuals

Background

The voice range profile (VRP) is an acoustic measurement in vocal function voice assessment. While several factors influencing VRP outcomes are known, the impact of body posture during VRP recordings remains unexplored.

Aims

To investigate the effects of standing and sitting posture on VRP performance in vocally healthy individuals.

Methods and Procedures

Thirty vocally healthy and untrained participants were randomised into two groups. Group 1 performed VRP measurements first in a sitting position, followed by standing. Group 2 completed the tasks in reverse order. VRP parameters were compared between sitting and standing positions, and training effects between the first and second measurements were analysed.

Outcomes and Results

No significant differences were found in any VRP parameter between sitting and standing positions (all p values > 0.05), with nearly all effect sizes being very small or small. Furthermore, no training effect was observed among the two trials in each group (all p values > 0.05, ICC > 0.75, very small or small effect sizes).

Conclusions and Implications

Posture (sitting vs. standing) did not significantly influence VRP performance in the first instance when considering people without voice disorders. This might suggest flexibility in patient positioning during VRP assessments, potentially simplifying clinical protocols without compromising data integrity.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject
  • Voice Range Profile (VRP) is a standard acoustic tool for assessing vocal function influenced by several factors such as recording methods, software, and patient characteristics. Though practical guidelines often recommend performing VRP assessments in a standing position, no empirical evidence has previously evaluated the effect of body posture on VRP outcomes. Thus, the clinical necessity of specific postural instructions during VRP remains unclear.
What this paper adds to the existing knowledge
  • This study is the first to investigate how body posture (sitting vs. standing) affects VRP performance in vocally healthy and untrained individuals. Using a randomised crossover design, it found no significant differences in any VRP parameter between sitting and standing conditions. Additionally, there was no observed training effect between repeated measurements, suggesting high test-retest reliability. These findings challenge the assumption that standing is superior for VRP assessments.
What are the potential or actual clinical implications for this work?
  • The results suggest that body posture may not substantially influence VRP outcomes in vocally healthy and untrained individuals. Therefore, conducting VRP assessments in either sitting or standing positions could be considered in certain clinical contexts, especially when accommodating patient needs. However, given the study's focus on healthy participants, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further research involving diverse populations, including individuals with voice disorders or specific postural conditions, is needed before recommending broader changes to clinical protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信