Ze Huang, Xiaoyan Fu, Ziteng Liu, Zongyan Li, Yonghai Guo, Zuxiao Chen, Haiyan Li
{"title":"团队合作能实现梦想吗?双外科医生内镜下双侧保留乳头乳房切除术及即刻乳房重建技术。","authors":"Ze Huang, Xiaoyan Fu, Ziteng Liu, Zongyan Li, Yonghai Guo, Zuxiao Chen, Haiyan Li","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (E-NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) represents a key surgical technique in the evolution of minimally invasive breast surgery. For endoscopic bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy (E-BNSM) with IBR, all surgical steps are typically performed by a single surgeon. Given the complexity of E-BNSM with IBR, we proposed the dual-surgeon (DS) technique as an alternative approach. In this study, the authors compared the surgical outcomes between the single-surgeon and dual-surgeon approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who underwent E-BNSM with IBR at a single institution between March 2021 and March 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the number of surgeons involved during the procedure: a single-surgeon (SS) cohort and a DS cohort. Baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients were included in this study, with 26 undergoing the SS approach and 21 undergoing the DS approach. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Compared to the SS approach, the DS approach decreased the mean operative time by 36.8 min (p = 0.036). Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, and operation costs were comparable between the two cohorts (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, final pathology results, and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DS technique positively influenced outcomes in E-BNSM with IBR, significantly reducing operative time. This innovative technique holds potential clinical utility, warranting further validation through larger-scale studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2644-2650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Teamwork Make the Dream Work? A Dual-Surgeon Technique for Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Ze Huang, Xiaoyan Fu, Ziteng Liu, Zongyan Li, Yonghai Guo, Zuxiao Chen, Haiyan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjs.70110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (E-NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) represents a key surgical technique in the evolution of minimally invasive breast surgery. For endoscopic bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy (E-BNSM) with IBR, all surgical steps are typically performed by a single surgeon. Given the complexity of E-BNSM with IBR, we proposed the dual-surgeon (DS) technique as an alternative approach. In this study, the authors compared the surgical outcomes between the single-surgeon and dual-surgeon approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who underwent E-BNSM with IBR at a single institution between March 2021 and March 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the number of surgeons involved during the procedure: a single-surgeon (SS) cohort and a DS cohort. Baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients were included in this study, with 26 undergoing the SS approach and 21 undergoing the DS approach. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Compared to the SS approach, the DS approach decreased the mean operative time by 36.8 min (p = 0.036). Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, and operation costs were comparable between the two cohorts (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, final pathology results, and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DS technique positively influenced outcomes in E-BNSM with IBR, significantly reducing operative time. This innovative technique holds potential clinical utility, warranting further validation through larger-scale studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2644-2650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70110\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:内窥镜保留乳头乳房切除术(E-NSM)联合即刻乳房重建术(IBR)是微创乳房外科发展的一项关键手术技术。对于内窥镜双侧保留乳头乳房切除术(E-BNSM)合并IBR,所有手术步骤通常由一名外科医生完成。考虑到合并IBR的E-BNSM的复杂性,我们建议采用双外科医生(DS)技术作为替代方法。在这项研究中,作者比较了单外科医生和双外科医生入路的手术结果。方法:对2021年3月至2024年3月在同一机构接受IBR E-BNSM的所有患者进行回顾性研究。根据手术过程中参与的外科医生数量,将患者分为两组:单外科医生(SS)组和DS组。分析和比较两组患者的基线特征和手术结果。结果:本研究共纳入47例患者,其中SS入路26例,DS入路21例。两组患者的基线特征相似。与SS入路相比,DS入路平均手术时间缩短36.8 min (p = 0.036)。两组患者术中出血量、术后住院时间和手术费用比较(p < 0.05)。术后并发症、最终病理结果和肿瘤预后无统计学差异。结论:DS技术对伴有IBR的E-BNSM的预后有积极影响,显著缩短了手术时间。这项创新技术具有潜在的临床应用价值,需要通过更大规模的研究进一步验证。
Does Teamwork Make the Dream Work? A Dual-Surgeon Technique for Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Background: Endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (E-NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) represents a key surgical technique in the evolution of minimally invasive breast surgery. For endoscopic bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy (E-BNSM) with IBR, all surgical steps are typically performed by a single surgeon. Given the complexity of E-BNSM with IBR, we proposed the dual-surgeon (DS) technique as an alternative approach. In this study, the authors compared the surgical outcomes between the single-surgeon and dual-surgeon approaches.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who underwent E-BNSM with IBR at a single institution between March 2021 and March 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the number of surgeons involved during the procedure: a single-surgeon (SS) cohort and a DS cohort. Baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two cohorts.
Results: A total of 47 patients were included in this study, with 26 undergoing the SS approach and 21 undergoing the DS approach. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Compared to the SS approach, the DS approach decreased the mean operative time by 36.8 min (p = 0.036). Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, and operation costs were comparable between the two cohorts (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, final pathology results, and oncological outcomes.
Conclusions: The DS technique positively influenced outcomes in E-BNSM with IBR, significantly reducing operative time. This innovative technique holds potential clinical utility, warranting further validation through larger-scale studies.
期刊介绍:
World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.