让我们谈谈艾滋病吧,宝贝!通过生殖司法框架批评印度2017年的《艾滋病毒和艾滋病法案》。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q1 LAW
Apoorva Nangia, Jwalika Balaji
{"title":"让我们谈谈艾滋病吧,宝贝!通过生殖司法框架批评印度2017年的《艾滋病毒和艾滋病法案》。","authors":"Apoorva Nangia, Jwalika Balaji","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The HIV and AIDS Act was enacted in India in 2017 to protect the right to privacy, bodily autonomy, and non-discrimination of Persons Living with HIV (PLHIV). Prior to the Act, HIV/AIDS-related jurisprudence in India developed largely through judicial decisions on privacy, health care, queer rights, and marriage. This jurisprudence stigmatised PLHIV and constructed them as threats to society. The Act sought to respond to such characterisations and affirmed several rights of PLHIV that were previously denied. This article uses the reproductive justice framework to analyse the scope and potential of the Act in furthering sexual and reproductive freedoms of PLHIV and their partners. The article argues that despite the various rights and anti-discrimination protections under the Act, the law is insufficient to address the systemic and structural issues affecting PLHIV. The Act is premised on the problematic assumption that PLHIV are 'risky' sexual subjects, which affects the construction of rights and benefits. Furthermore, the Act does not, and arguably cannot, holistically address the problems faced by PLHIV in sexual, marital, and familial relationships. These constraints are a crucial reminder of the larger limitation of law as a blunt policy tool that is unable to comprehensively address complex socio-legal issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let's talk about AIDS, baby! Critiquing the HIV and AIDS Act, 2017 in India through a reproductive justice framework.\",\"authors\":\"Apoorva Nangia, Jwalika Balaji\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The HIV and AIDS Act was enacted in India in 2017 to protect the right to privacy, bodily autonomy, and non-discrimination of Persons Living with HIV (PLHIV). Prior to the Act, HIV/AIDS-related jurisprudence in India developed largely through judicial decisions on privacy, health care, queer rights, and marriage. This jurisprudence stigmatised PLHIV and constructed them as threats to society. The Act sought to respond to such characterisations and affirmed several rights of PLHIV that were previously denied. This article uses the reproductive justice framework to analyse the scope and potential of the Act in furthering sexual and reproductive freedoms of PLHIV and their partners. The article argues that despite the various rights and anti-discrimination protections under the Act, the law is insufficient to address the systemic and structural issues affecting PLHIV. The Act is premised on the problematic assumption that PLHIV are 'risky' sexual subjects, which affects the construction of rights and benefits. Furthermore, the Act does not, and arguably cannot, holistically address the problems faced by PLHIV in sexual, marital, and familial relationships. These constraints are a crucial reminder of the larger limitation of law as a blunt policy tool that is unable to comprehensively address complex socio-legal issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Law Review\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453666/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwaf034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwaf034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度于2017年颁布了《艾滋病毒和艾滋病法》,以保护艾滋病毒感染者的隐私权、身体自主权和不受歧视的权利。在该法案出台之前,印度与艾滋病毒/艾滋病有关的法律主要是通过对隐私、保健、同性恋权利和婚姻的司法裁决而发展起来的。这一判例将hiv污名化,并将其构建为对社会的威胁。该法案试图回应这些特征,并确认了以前被剥夺的艾滋病毒感染者的几项权利。本文使用生殖司法框架来分析该法案在促进艾滋病毒感染者及其伴侣的性和生殖自由方面的范围和潜力。文章认为,尽管该法规定了各种权利和反歧视保护,但该法不足以解决影响艾滋病毒携带者的系统性和结构性问题。该法案的前提是一个有问题的假设,即艾滋病毒携带者是“危险的”性主体,这影响了权利和利益的构建。此外,该法案没有,也可以说不能全面解决艾滋病毒携带者在性、婚姻和家庭关系中面临的问题。这些限制至关重要地提醒我们,法律作为一种生硬的政策工具存在更大的局限性,无法全面解决复杂的社会法律问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Let's talk about AIDS, baby! Critiquing the HIV and AIDS Act, 2017 in India through a reproductive justice framework.

The HIV and AIDS Act was enacted in India in 2017 to protect the right to privacy, bodily autonomy, and non-discrimination of Persons Living with HIV (PLHIV). Prior to the Act, HIV/AIDS-related jurisprudence in India developed largely through judicial decisions on privacy, health care, queer rights, and marriage. This jurisprudence stigmatised PLHIV and constructed them as threats to society. The Act sought to respond to such characterisations and affirmed several rights of PLHIV that were previously denied. This article uses the reproductive justice framework to analyse the scope and potential of the Act in furthering sexual and reproductive freedoms of PLHIV and their partners. The article argues that despite the various rights and anti-discrimination protections under the Act, the law is insufficient to address the systemic and structural issues affecting PLHIV. The Act is premised on the problematic assumption that PLHIV are 'risky' sexual subjects, which affects the construction of rights and benefits. Furthermore, the Act does not, and arguably cannot, holistically address the problems faced by PLHIV in sexual, marital, and familial relationships. These constraints are a crucial reminder of the larger limitation of law as a blunt policy tool that is unable to comprehensively address complex socio-legal issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Law Review
Medical Law Review MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Law Review is established as an authoritative source of reference for academics, lawyers, legal and medical practitioners, law students, and anyone interested in healthcare and the law. The journal presents articles of international interest which provide thorough analyses and comment on the wide range of topical issues that are fundamental to this expanding area of law. In addition, commentary sections provide in depth explorations of topical aspects of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信