Pierre Goffin, Jean-Pierre Lecoq, Alberto Prats-Galino, Xavier Sala-Blanch
{"title":"简化超声肩胛上切口探查在区域麻醉中的应用。","authors":"Pierre Goffin, Jean-Pierre Lecoq, Alberto Prats-Galino, Xavier Sala-Blanch","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-107054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The suprascapular nerve block at the notch level is commonly performed. However, ultrasound identification of the notch remains challenging due to significant anatomical variability. We conducted a combined ultrasound and dry bone anatomical study to better characterize the suprascapular notch and develop a simplified classification system tailored for anesthesiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an observational anatomical study on 71 dry scapulae. The shape of the suprascapular notch was assessed using the Rengachary classification. We also measured the maximum depth (the deepest point of the notch) and the superior transverse diameter (the maximum distance between the edges of the notch). Additionally, an ultrasound observational study was conducted on 108 healthy volunteers to evaluate notch shape and determine the same measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on ultrasound findings, the most common notch types were type III (34%, n=70), type II (31%, n=63), and type IV (20%, n=42). Non-parametric analysis revealed no significant association between notch type and participant age, sex, height, or weight. Furthermore, the distribution of notch types did not differ significantly between the left and right sides. For types II-IV, the median maximum depth was 5 mm [4-6], and the median superior transverse diameter was 18 mm [15-20]. Similar results were observed in the dry scapula analysis, though a high degree of variability in notch types was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings revealed that notch types II-IV, according to the Rengachary classification, are the most prevalent. Nonetheless, the suprascapular notch shows substantial anatomical diversity. To address this, we propose a simplified ultrasound-based classification, centered on the presence or absence of a clearly identifiable notch. This system aims to support clinical decision-making in regional anesthesia and enhance consistency in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplifying ultrasound suprascapular notch exploration for regional anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Pierre Goffin, Jean-Pierre Lecoq, Alberto Prats-Galino, Xavier Sala-Blanch\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2025-107054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The suprascapular nerve block at the notch level is commonly performed. However, ultrasound identification of the notch remains challenging due to significant anatomical variability. We conducted a combined ultrasound and dry bone anatomical study to better characterize the suprascapular notch and develop a simplified classification system tailored for anesthesiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an observational anatomical study on 71 dry scapulae. The shape of the suprascapular notch was assessed using the Rengachary classification. We also measured the maximum depth (the deepest point of the notch) and the superior transverse diameter (the maximum distance between the edges of the notch). Additionally, an ultrasound observational study was conducted on 108 healthy volunteers to evaluate notch shape and determine the same measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on ultrasound findings, the most common notch types were type III (34%, n=70), type II (31%, n=63), and type IV (20%, n=42). Non-parametric analysis revealed no significant association between notch type and participant age, sex, height, or weight. Furthermore, the distribution of notch types did not differ significantly between the left and right sides. For types II-IV, the median maximum depth was 5 mm [4-6], and the median superior transverse diameter was 18 mm [15-20]. Similar results were observed in the dry scapula analysis, though a high degree of variability in notch types was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings revealed that notch types II-IV, according to the Rengachary classification, are the most prevalent. Nonetheless, the suprascapular notch shows substantial anatomical diversity. To address this, we propose a simplified ultrasound-based classification, centered on the presence or absence of a clearly identifiable notch. This system aims to support clinical decision-making in regional anesthesia and enhance consistency in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-107054\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-107054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simplifying ultrasound suprascapular notch exploration for regional anesthesia.
Background: The suprascapular nerve block at the notch level is commonly performed. However, ultrasound identification of the notch remains challenging due to significant anatomical variability. We conducted a combined ultrasound and dry bone anatomical study to better characterize the suprascapular notch and develop a simplified classification system tailored for anesthesiologists.
Methods: We performed an observational anatomical study on 71 dry scapulae. The shape of the suprascapular notch was assessed using the Rengachary classification. We also measured the maximum depth (the deepest point of the notch) and the superior transverse diameter (the maximum distance between the edges of the notch). Additionally, an ultrasound observational study was conducted on 108 healthy volunteers to evaluate notch shape and determine the same measurements.
Results: Based on ultrasound findings, the most common notch types were type III (34%, n=70), type II (31%, n=63), and type IV (20%, n=42). Non-parametric analysis revealed no significant association between notch type and participant age, sex, height, or weight. Furthermore, the distribution of notch types did not differ significantly between the left and right sides. For types II-IV, the median maximum depth was 5 mm [4-6], and the median superior transverse diameter was 18 mm [15-20]. Similar results were observed in the dry scapula analysis, though a high degree of variability in notch types was noted.
Conclusions: Our findings revealed that notch types II-IV, according to the Rengachary classification, are the most prevalent. Nonetheless, the suprascapular notch shows substantial anatomical diversity. To address this, we propose a simplified ultrasound-based classification, centered on the presence or absence of a clearly identifiable notch. This system aims to support clinical decision-making in regional anesthesia and enhance consistency in practice.
期刊介绍:
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications.
Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).